Is climate change an imagined problem promoted by censorship and the media without scientific evidence?
You are better off listening to actual climatologists on this one, as opposed to politicians. lawyers, and conspiracy alarmists.Ask yourself 1) What the science community would have to gain by perpetrating a global wide conspiracy to defraud the public? 2) How could the secrecy be maintained by the thousands of researchers who persist in it?Any scientist who had actual, scientific data that “disproves” AGW would be instantly famous, successful, and showered with vast amounts of funding by people who have money on the table, such as the petroleum and coal industries. Dr. Richard Muller was originally such a skeptical scientist, and was rewarded with generous funding to pursue his skepticism further. Much to the dismay of the funders, he eventually convinced himself that AGW was real. The Conversion of a Climate-Change Skeptic His ongoing findings are available here. Home - Berkeley EartDo your own research, the data is open-source. Here is a one good site. Climate Central: A Science and News OrganizationAnd another. Global Climate ChangeIf you would like to learn some of the actual science that underpins climate studies, this is a free, online course. Understanding the Forecast" by David ArcherAnd I can’t leave without recommending this book by Dr. James Hansen, who led the climate research efforts at NASA for many years, and acted as a presidential advisor.Storms of My Grandchildren: The Truth about the Coming Climate Catastrophe and Our Last Chance to Save Humanity 1, James Hansen - Amazon.com