What are some examples of indirect characterization?
Indirect characterization is when an author writes about a character and his/her personality through that character's thoughts, words, and actions. An author would write about a character's personality. For example: instead of stating that a character is angry, the author would describe the character punching a wall.
INDIRECT CHARACTERIZATION?!?
I'm reading THE CAT IN THE HAT! Can an example of an indirect characterization be something like a character said and us assuming something from it. The little boy (narrator) says ““Now look what you did!” Said the fish to the cat. “Now look at this house...You sank our toy ship... you shook our house... You get out of this house!”" And I can infer from that the Fish doesn't like the Cat, and wants the house to be cleaner. Also do I have to say the little boy (narrator) says, or can I just say the fish said.
What are some examples of direct and indirect characterization in literature?
Characterization direct and indirectCharacterization Examples and Definition - Literary Devices
What characterizes a great ending in fiction?
Here are three qualities that many of the best endings share: Great endings elevate the work to new heights of brilliance - a great ending is not a mere summation of events or the inevitable conclusion of a story. A truly great ending lifts the work in question to previously uncharted heights within that particular work of fiction. Some of the best examples of this can be found in Shakespeare's tragedies. The devastating climaxes of King Lear, Hamlet, Othello and Romeo & Juliet give all four works depth, resonance and pathos. Most of all though, they provide the reader with striking images in their finales that stay with them for years to come. Great endings make you want to reread the rest of the work - the best endings allow the work to either come full circle or complete a circle. Either way, such endings ensure the book has a sense of closure (or in the case of serialised fiction, a perfect cliffhanger ending that still manages to be a satisfactory self-contained work) that breeds a deep curiosity to revisit earlier parts of the story to further our understanding of the overall story. When I finished the likes of Moby Dick and Lolita, their endings made me want to return to earlier parts of those respective books, for this very reason. Great endings are never quite what the reader expects them to be - even if you know the work you are reading is a comedy or tragedy and are therefore that genre conventions will lead to a certain type of ending, the finest conclusions to a work of fiction will still manage to end the story in a way which subtly defies the reader's expectations. So, for example, in Macbeth, Macbeth's haunting, final soliloquy makes the reader sympathise with this tyrant in his final few hours, turning his inevitable death not into a moment of triumph, but instead leaving us with a strange dual sensation of relief and sadness.
What tool can I use to rephrase my sentences and check my grammar or sentence structure?
When it comes to writing an academic paper, composing an article or creating web content, there is one thing you should keep in mind: don’t copy someone else’s information, but come up with your own or at least paraphrase borrowed ideas using rephrase sentence generator. Otherwise, you’ll be accused of plagiarism and fail as a writer. That’s why there are so many online rewording tools which help us to make our pieces of writing original.There is one great paraphrasing generator which is really handy and effective:it takes a few seconds to receive rephrased content: put your piece of writing on the page, press “Paraphrase” button and check results instantly;this tool is absolutely free to use whenever you need it;it’s comfortable in use and doesn’t require creating an account or installing suspicious software on your computer.Alternatively, if you need 100% high-quality results, consider hiring professional rewriters with solid rephrasing skills and experience in this area. Good paraphrasing at a small price sounds like a great option, isn’t it?
Can anyone give nice tips for a 3-3 Asian parliamentary debate?
Few tips I got from countless tournaments I judged across Asia:Stand. Prime Minister should clearly or explicitly explain the chair his/her stand. It helps the judge to eliminate inconsistencies later on in the debate.Clarity. All speakers should explain arguments as clear as possible. Avoid using “too much examples.” Doing so could confuse the judge or over-intellectualize your case.Characterization. For arguments to be strong, it has to be well-characterized. Debates especially the political ones should be well-described. The highly debated motion— Israel-Palestine conflict for example—burdens Government side to historically explain the nature of the conflict, the roles they play in the eyes of the international community, the involvement of the UN Security Council or the General Assembly for that matter, and the bargaining chips offered for both states in the negotiating table. If judges felt you’re so well informed on these things, chances are you gonna get more attention.Framing. Sharpest debaters are experts on this. They limit the space of debate while making it sound fair and square. If the motion is so general, Prime Minister speaker can limit the debate to a specific issue to make the debate more context-based and clear.Structure. The trend right now is to package your constructive arguments well. In practice, this is the proper sequence for opening speaker:Your Stand—includes but not limited on clarifications, points of concession, burdens, standards (for value-judgement debates) etc.Your Context—sometimes this is integrated in the launch of constructive arguments.Your Constructives—includes but not limited on positive contribution in the debate. Strong arguments shine brighter if backed by examples, facts of the average reasonable person.*It’s much more helpful if you consistently expose yourself to any tournament internationally.“Sustained exposure” is still the best way to break your perceived limits and conquer the debate world.