Are these sentences grammatically correct?
Neither and nor are called correlative conjunctions. The function of correlative conjunctions is to connect grammatical structures of equal importance. Simply speaking, the part of speech after both the conjunctions should remain the same. If a noun follows neither, only a noun would follow nor. If a verb follows a neither, only a verb would follow nor. This technique will prove to be very handy while tackling correlative conjunctions and in extension, questions based on parallelism, which require the application of the usage of correlative conjunctions.The sentence provided says I like neither boys (noun) nor girls (noun), which is the correct formation. Had the sentence been I neither like (verb) boys, the nor clause would have been like this nor do(verb) I like girls.Hope that helped!
Is these sentences grammatically correct?
"I am contacting you regarding following up on an inquiry about a possible PhD research opportunity within your research group for ............. . I enclosed a copy of my previous email plus my CV for your consideration". How I can make these sentences more remarkable?
Are these sentences grammatically correct?
kinou wa tegami o kakimashita ano neko wa tori o tabemashita. boku wa nihongo ga sukoshi hanasu. kono hon o yomimasu. watashi no nezumi wa sugasu. kinou wa gakkou ni ikimasen deshita.
Are these sentences grammatically correct?
1. Correct: IS my brother in England now? (The verb "has" doesn't make sense in this sentence. Someone IS in a place NOW.) 2. Is Tom in the garden? - Correct 3. Is Lisa a good friend of mine? - Correct (Only change the small "l" into a capital "L". Proper names are always written with an initial capital letter.) 4. Correct: Tom HAS not workED in the garden since 3 p.m. / Tom HAS not BEEN working in the garden since 3 p.m. (Before the adverb "since" you need to use a perfect tense. Since the verb "work" expresses a long, durative action, you can use the present perfect or the present perfect continuous.) 5. Correct: HAS Tom BEEN working in the garden since 3 p.m.? (Before the adverb "since" you need to use a perfect tense.)
Is this sentence grammatically correct?
The first thing to note is the sentence is missing a few words to round out the overall direction of the sense. See the suggested amendment below.The second is the sentence is crying out for splitting into two separate sentences. There are multiple blocks of 'meaningfulness' and they put the original sentence structure in danger of being misinterpreted. If a high-level native English speaker like me could misinterpret, then you do the math it’s going to be hard for the less proficient.Other than that, you should put the thing in more regular English phraseology first — it’s ultimately pointless to fix grammar when the phraseology is ‘problematic.’The original:—“Voters voted in high stake elections that could shift the power within the hardline-controlled Islamic elites by ushering in a reformist comeback or help conservatives tighten their grip on power.”Suggested amendment:—“The balance of power for the Islamic elites and hardliners rides on the high-stakes elections. Voting could usher in a reformist comeback, or potentially help drive the conservatives to tighten their grip on power even further.”There! Recast the thing from another angle, and you could avoid futzing around over ‘help’ vs. ‘helping.’Thanks for the A2A.
Are these sentence grammatically correct?
What's name and what in name are not grammatically correct. What's name could be what's a name, and what in name could be what is in a name, but if you're trying to say what is your name, that's the only way to say it.
Which one of these sentences is grammatically correct?
Yes. Keep the “a”. It’s not the “products” that the “a” is referring to. It’s the “affordable price”; and that’s singular.“The products” and “a much more affordable price” are two separate objects. Notice the “the” in front of “products”. That’s a clue that you don’t need any additional directives, modifiers or articles to address the object “products”. “affordable price” however, is singular and has no article; therefore it should be given the “a”.If you were to pluralize “price” and make it “prices”, you wouldn’t need any article at all.“Buy the products at much more affordable prices.”When an object is singular it typically requires an article. When the object is plural it typically doesn’t.“When I was in college I sold a computer.”“When I was in college I sold computers.”“I enjoy a drink every now and then.”“I enjoy drinks every now and then.”“I went on Quora today and answered a question.”“I went on Quora today and answered questions.”
Which of these sentences are grammatically correct, and why?
#1 is correct, the way you've written it. You are describing a "kind of person", not just yourself, so you use the third person pronoun. If you are just talking about yourself, you could simply say "I need dead silence while I do my homework."