Bobby Lashley, Brock Lesnar, or Bruce Lee?
Anyone who said Lesnar or lashley are fools especially RTBlaze. Lee was amazing, if you can find his sparring or training videos, then you'll see. He got rid of all the crap that he didnt need and created Jeet Kune Do. But this style was only really suited to him. I think he could of beaten anyone on this planet 1 on 1. Gertin, Lesnar is 32 thats not young for a MMA fighter.
Who would win bobby lashley vs. brock lesnar?
Lesnar by annihilation. Lashley has fought no serious competition. Lesnar has more experience, has fought better competition, and has been training longer. Lesnar is a much better wrestler and has better striking. Although both are relatively new to the sport Lesnar is way ahead of where Lashley is.
Which beating is worse to take from, Brock Lesnar or Bobby Lashley?
Brock once broke hardcore holly neck with a really really bad power bomb. You know what he did even he seen he made the mistake he kicked the guys head and neck.Brock used his elbows to break open Randy Ortons face! I still don’t get the reason and if it was really planned this way.He is bloody fast still st his age. He was faster in his 20s. I think I could outrun bobby but not Brock.
Why is WWE not pushing Bobby Lashley like they do Brock Lesnar, despite their similar wrestling histories?
Here let's here let's not sugarcoat shit here the WWE will not push Bobby Lashley to be WWE champion because he is black. It's that simple. The last main WWE Champion that was black I guess you could say it is the rock but even then he is a Samoan mostly.Lashley was great on the mic in TNA, okay before I go any further I'm just going to let you know this is kind of a rant because it's been getting to me and I'm just going to go ahead and say what I have to say here. Whether people on here like it or not.Lashley was great in TNA, he was that cocky arrogant heel he was amazing at cutting promos and he just flowed on the mic naturally, and it was pretty funny how arrogant he was. Of course TNA has different management though, they have more freedom the wrestlers, to say what they want to say and they didn't mind giving the main Championship to a black man. Especially one that was deserving of it. Not to discredit Brock Lesnar, he is my favorite wrestler right now no matter even if he does not show up too often or not, he is still the most exciting passionate wrestler when he's in that ring.But as far as pushing someone to the top, it's not going to happen with Lashley and everybody knows why. It's the elephant in the room that nobody wants to talk about. Nobody on this comment section has mentioned this or has acknowledged the lashley was great with the mic and wrestling skills in TNA. I wonder why?But let's but let's also look at the new day group, they are basically just a comedy act correct? They will never be any more than that. Yes they were Tag Team Champions but they will never neither one of them will ever be the main Champion. Like the WWE champion.History has told us that. Now does not cover that up in that like it's not true. Man I could go on and on about this but I'm going to go ahead and just end it right there
Who would Win a fight between Brock Lesnar and Bobby Lashley?
Bobby lashley will have an upper hand over lesnar. Both are equal in size, strength and power. But mma record of lashley is far better than lesnar. Moreover, lesnar is a hype, to attract viewers. Obviously, shahrukh khan will attract more audience than hrithick roshan, but that doesn't mean that hrithick is a bad actor. It's the fate of two wrestlers, that Brock got the fame and recognition more than lashley, despite lashley being better athleteWwe is a different avenue, there are gimmicks and fights are planned to happen in a certain direction. Lashley proved his mettle, but never got an opportunity to become a show stopper like lesnar. People admire lesnar because, they have heard his name more. That's marketing. Lesnar sells easily, that's why wwe and mma have made him the hype, but on ground, there are many athletes who outmanoeuvre lesnar, like bobby lashley, Alastair overeem, Carl valasquez etc etc. Even Goldberg is having more strength than lesnar, consider the age he is in.Moreover, lesnar is always surrounded by accusations of steroid abuse. He was found positive on steroids many times in earlier instances. That's one of the reason that lesnar nowadays is keeping away from mma, as it has earlier tweaked rules to accommodate lesnar, as accused by mark hunt and valasquez.
Do you believe what Bobby Lashley said about he can beat Brock Lesnar in a wrestling match and in the octagon?
Lashley never impressed me in his MMA career, his opponents were not quality opponents. Lesnar faced top competition in the UFC and his first loss to Frank Mir was due to an early stoppage by the referee.That being said, right now, Lashley would have the advantage over Lesnar only because Lesnar has had major surgery on his stomach making it a vulnerable area and easy to exploit.Pre-surgery Lesnar would most likely be beaten by The Beast.
Is Brock Lesnar beatable?
** Gabriel Gonzaga...unless Gonzaga can come out with a devastating kick and catch Lesnar off guard, no. Lesnar's wrestling is too good. ** Josh Barnett...possibly. ** Brett Rogers...Rogers is a big guy with heavy hands. Lesnar knows how to deal with that...agility and quickness. ** Shane Carwin...probably just as good of a shot as Fedor. ** Alistair Overeem...possibly. ** Bobby Lashley...give Lashley 3 or 4 more fights before he could step in with the best in the UFC...then Lesnar will be right around the corner. ** Kimbo Slice (Assuming he does win the Ultimate Fighter)...no. and last but certainly not least...Fedor Emelianenko!...still the best bet in this whole list.