What do you agree with Hillary Clinton on?
Her proposed policies on mental health care, the environment, and the college system were among some of the most progressive, and therefore most good, platforms ever proposed by a would be head of state. Just like how we missed out on the more progressive option of John Kerry in 2004 for the bumbling conservative baffoon due to low IQ voters, the same happened in 2016 with Trump over Hillary. We missed out on what would have been a good president.
How much do you agree with the statement "Hillary is lucky to run against Trump as he is the only candidate she can beat"?
I think that between the nine state Governors and four US Senators who tried to run against Donald Trump the only time one of them inflicted so much as a scratch on Donald Trump was Ted Cruz not endorsing him at the Republican convention. I therefore find it amusing this assumption that someone from a field of people who couldn’t even slow Donald Trump would automatically defeat the candidate demolishing him.Also via the New York Times we can see which candidate won the primary where.And one thing sticks out like a sore thumb. Donald Trump is the one with traction in almost all the swing states. Ted Cruz wins Iowa and Maine? Who cares if he loses Florida, North Carolina, and Ohio? Ted Cruz was on Clinton’s top three list of desired opponents - alongside Donald Trump and Ben Carson. He has no traction outside the Republican base. OK, so his defeat doesn’t risk losing the GOP Texas, unlike Trump (where Texas is currently a toss-up state). Clinton was also beating Cruz heavily in the head to heads when he dropped out.In short Clinton beats Cruz.This leaves Clinton vs Rubio, a sitting Senator who couldn’t win his home state, or Clinton vs Kasich who was lying in fourth in a three way race for parts of that primary (to steal a joke from Sam Bee). Rubio was a possibility - but I’m absolutely certain that Clinton had a ton of opposition research to drop on him. And Kasich was the token moderate in the race. Kasich v Clinton is probably a Kasich victory - but he needs to get there first.The next three were Ben Carson (Clinton wins - Carson is not a competent politician), Jeb! “please clap” Bush (Clinton again wins), and Rand Paul (I don’t know enough about him rather than his father).To put it simply I think a moderate Republican with more charisma than Jeb! Bush would have beaten Clinton. I also think that there was no chance of a moderate Republican winning the 2016 Republican primary, a race in which the winner was Donald Trump and the runner up was Ted Cruz. And in which the competent moderate-seeming Kasich only managed 5% of the vote.Or to put it bluntly, the closest to true the premise gets is that “Hillary Clinton is lucky to run against a party that is extremist enough to have nominated Donald Trump and in which Ted Cruz was the runner up”.
Do you agree with Hillary Clinton that the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. FEC (558 U.S. 310 (2010)) should be overturned? Why or why not?
Whether I agree with Hillary Clinton is irrelevant. The meat of the matter is that the Citizens United ruling was wrong. Succinctly: Legal entities not specifically addressed in the United States Constitution do not possess any constitutional rights. Therefore, the United States congress may regulate such entities subject to the elective control of the people with the exception that groups of people have the right to assemble and to petition government for redress of grievances. That is what the constitution says and you must have special glasses to make it read otherwise. Corporations do not have constitutional rights of any kind. They have legal rights set by the judiciary and the congress. And the congress is superior to the judiciary if constitutionality is not at issue.It proves to be a certainty that the judiciary will create precedent and case law that assures such things as protection from warrant-less search and seizure applicable to legal entities. It has also proved certain that the elective control will not allow the congress to legislate otherwise. That is how this system was designed to operate.
Do you agree with Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine that the government should not be used to force religious behaviors on others?
Abortion isn't a religious issue. It's right or wrong. An abortion is killing a living human organism.the argument is when life begins. Some say at conception some say at birth. I will ask you this. If tomorrow scientist found a single cell organism on mars, what would the headlines read? LIFE ON MARS! Pro choices definitions of life is a matter of convenience. They argue that a woman has the right to choose. This is true. They have the right to choose to obstain, use protection, and take birth control. Pregnancy is very avoidable. There is the argument of incest, rape, or genetic abnormality. Which consists of less than 3 percent of pregnancies. I personally support the action in incest cases. One of my best friends was the product of a rape. And one of my realitives was told their child would be autistic. He was born perfectly healthy with no signs of autism. It is dumbfounding that the same people who support abortions also support socialized welfare. This says to me that they are willing to take care of someone, as long as your mother chooses to birth you.
Do you agree with Hillary Clinton that coal miners and coal business should be put out of business?
No. 70 percent of the electricity in the US is produced by coal. So unless you want to go without electric power, I wouldn't agree with her. Unless you can replace the thousands of power plants that take the weight of 70 percent of the electrical demand overnight, I wouldn't put out all of the coal companies just yet. Now, should alternatives be looked at and technologies investigated? Absolutely. Nuclear power is phenomenal. But no one wants to live near a nuke plant so the old coal plants will likely remain. I believe she opposes those as well. Thing about electricity is that the farther you move it in the wires, the more you lose. The more you lose, the more you have to generate. The more you have to generate, the bigger your equipment and infrastructure has to be. That equals more cost. How much more do you want to pay? Everyone wants cheap energy. You just can't get the Watts, on average, from other sources as cheaply (yet) as you can coal. And I say on average because the wind doesn't blow, nor does the sun shine, nor water flow equally everywhere. So in a round about way, electric cars run off of coal most of the time. Oops. So the next time any politician says something about energy, green or otherwise and regulations regarding the environment, remember those things. That goes for either side of the Isle too, cause there's a lot of bullshit and fear propagation that goes on from both. Energy is neither created or destroyed, only transfered or transformed. There's no such thing as a free lunch.
Do you agree with Hillary? Should President Trump keep the troops in Syria and continue killing Muslim families???
I agree with the military advisers and General Mattis. Mattis proffered his resignation on Dec. 20 after Trump abruptly decided to withdraw American troops from Syria, declaring the war against ISIS successful and complete. Though it didn’t offer any direct criticism of the president, Mattis’s resignation letter expressed a view of “alliances and partnerships” at odds with Trump’s erratic and shifting strategy. Also worth noting: The letter had no words of praise for the commander-in-chief, either. President Donald Trump once called the array of high-ranking military officers he appointed in his administration “my generals.” With Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis submitting his resignation letter on Dec. 20, by the time it takes effect at the end of February, all of Trump’s generals are gone. Trump is a complete idiot and a puppet for Putin. He should tried for treason and likely will be.
Do you agree with Hillary? Are the Anti-fa people great Americans ???
NO. Anykind of extremism that contains hatred for people as whole is EVIL. KKK, White Supremists are the very same thing. Just that ANTIFA members tend to come from WEALTH and have DADDY issues, Lost souls.
Do you agree with this comment about Hillary Clinton?
I heard a comment on the news this morning by an analyst, he said the difference between the two campaigns (Obama's and Clinton's) is that Hillary is unable to attract any new supporters "if you have already decided to vote for Hillary, you will vote for her" but she isnt getting traction with Independants or cross over republicans because she is deemed as stubborn and inflexible. Obama on the other hand is viewed as someone that is open to discussions and ideas, thus his campaign has been able to attract voters who may have not been supportive of him in the past. Now if you conisder that Obama has jumped in polls since Edwards dropped out, you can see where this analyst is coming from. Any thoughts on this analysis?
Do you agree with Hillary? Should Ivanka Trump be indicted for treason for deleting emails???
Did Ivanka "bleach" her computer records? Did she smash phones and computers with a hammer? Did she lie to congress about 30,000 e-mails that she said were all personal. Did she lie when she said there were only a few thousand? Did she lie when she said they did not contain sensitive information? Did she lie when she said no one could have gotten to them? And what were they doing on Anthony Weiner's laptop when he could have been extorted for sexual crimes? And finally, was Ivanka the Secretary of State?