What Grades do you give The Matches at Wrestlemania 29?
1 - I'd give it a solid C, not a whole lot except for the fact that I'm sure that Ambrose is going to be the break out from The Shield, he just seems to have that mysterious "It" factor and I think he's going to hoisting one of the big titles in the next 2 years and leaving the rest of The Shield in the dust. 2 - D. And that's grading on an overly generous curve. This match had about as much excitement as the Taker-Giant Gonzalez match at WM9 or 10. 3 - B. I like the call back they did to last year's WM with Bryan trying to go for the insanely fast pin after AJ kissed Dolph. 4 - D. You know Fandango, Flamingo, Faginasso, whatever he is called is definitely a not ready for primetime player especially with the knee-injury ending. 5 - B. This could have moved to A+ territory with Ziggler swooping in after the match to take the title, a chance missed by the WWE bookers. 6 - A-. It was great psychology, good thing that Taker only wrestles once a year now because he does put everything into his matches, making every match of his for the last 7 years or so must see television. 7 - A. Too bad it didn't go old school violent with Triple H and Lesnar getting cut more wide open than a surgical patient. Another one with great psychology and great spots given the ground and pound styles that they both employ. 8. C+. I really, really, really wanted this to be one of those great matches, but it was meh for so long that by the time action was picking up I realized I wouldn't need ambien to get some sleep. Overall, I'd give WM29 a B-, I mean it isn't the dregs, it isn't as lousy as WM II, WM V, or IX. But a world away from III, XIV, XV, and XVI it wasn't even funny.
What is your WWE WrestleMania 32, in 2016 Predictions? Thanks.?
The Andre The Giant 20 Men Memorial Battle Royal. Winner: Braun Strowman or Bray Wyatt. The Uso's vs The Dudley Boyz. Winner: The Usos. Team Lana vs Team Brie Bella. Winner: Team Brie Bella. Ryback vs Kalisto. Winner: Kalisto. Kevin Owens vs Sami Zayn vs Dolph Ziggler vs Zack Ryder vs Sin Cara vs Stardust vs The Miz. Winner: Sami Zayn. League Of Nation vs The New Day. Winners: League of Nations. AJ Styles vs Chris Jericho. Winner: AJ Styles. Brock Lesnar vs Dean Ambrose. Winner: Dean Ambrose. The Undertaker vs Shane McMahon. Winner: Ends in a draw(No contest). Charlotte vs Becky Lynch vs Sasha Banks. Winner: Sasha Banks. Triple H vs Roman Reigns. Winner: Roman Reigns.
Professional Wrestling: How was Kofi Kingston over, yet Daniel Bryan isn't?
Whoa, I never said that Daniel Bryan wasn't over and that Kofi Kingston was. Apparently, he is over because he has many fans chanting "yes" whenever he cuts his promos and performs his moves in the ring. Kofi Kingston used to be over, but not anymore. My point is that Daniel Bryan is just a trendy wrestler. He's only over because the people that support him followed him since his Ring of Honor days and are huge fans of the indies, which is beyond the mainstream. My point was that Daniel Bryan doesn't have any characteristics that would make him attractive to fans beyond his cult following. The man doesn't look tough, he's small compared to the average wrestler, most of his moves consist of kicks to chests and a few submission holds, he can't cut good promos, he can't stay healthy, and "yes" is the only thing that he has going for him. What's so special about him? He's overrated. By the way, I know what a paragraph is. If you can't read a measly 186 words without it being broken into tiny paragraphs, then paragraph it yourself in Word. EDIT: BTW, how exactly is an athletic acrobat that can do cool moves less skilled than a man that only does kicks, says "yes," locks in a few submissions, and has poor mic skills? Is there any underlying reason why you're so biased against Kofi Kingston?
Is Roman Reigns really the next big star?
I think this is the first time in a long time that the WWE's had a cache of talent worthy of pushing guys like Cena and Orton out of the limelight. The guys you've listed are people who all lacked a certain something to take over as face of the company, whereas now Vince has at least 6 choices in his current roster to push to the moon as the next big thing. Guys like Wyatt (hell, even Harper), Reigns, Ambrose, Rollins, Bryan, and Cesaro are all catching steam. Barrett would if he could keep off of the injured reserves! We're in a pretty exciting time in wrestling where the WWE's set to redefine their brand once again with a new era of new talent with personalities that people can connect with and enjoy to watch, along with in-ring styles that Vince has either never pushed, or hasn't pushed in years. And I hope they avoid the old 'depush' formula when it comes to guys with so much steam in their sails like Reigns and Rollins (Cesaro's taken two losses to Kofi, so take that however you'd like) because I feel like watching Raw now in a way that I haven't felt like watching it since maybe 2004.
Will Brock Lesnar and Bobby Lashley feud after WrestleMania 34?
Will Brock Lesnar and Bobby Lashley feud after Wrestlemania 34?There have been rumours of Lashley returning to the WWE after 10 years. Many people hope to see a dream match between Lashley and Lesnar as they both have a background in MMA. The question then lies whether WWE would engage them in a feud after Wrestlemania where Brock will most likely drop the title to Roman.We need to consider the different factors in this. Lesnar is rumoured to be leaving WWE after Wrestlemania to pursue a UFC career again. As of now, he is also a part timer. He may very well not want to have a feud with Lashley, especially not a long term thing. Lashley also may not benefit by feuding with Lesnar. Lesnar’s prime was in 2002, when he first debuted, and although he has been pushed as a beast, he has fell from what he used to be in the Ruthless Aggression Era. If they had a feud back then, if might have been good. However, now that they have been in the business for a while, they may not be able to scale greater heights and give each other a push to get over with the fans.
Why was Roman Reigns booed in Royal Rumble?
Roman Reigns is fairly new and hasn't been built up properly yet. The WWE clearly wanted to push him as a major singles guy, but after the Shield's split up, he's had one major singles match against Orton and that's it. His injury did him no favours. Him winning the Superstar of the Year Slammy when he was injured for half the year also made it seem like WWE was shoving him down our throats.Clearly, the crowd favourites going into the Rumble were Bryan, Ziggler, Ambrose and Reigns in that order. Nobody booed Reigns when he entered. The crowd cheered for him quite a bit.But during the match, he did absolutely nothing noteworthy. Last year, he eliminated 12 people, and the crowd was hot for him.WWE thought that by having Kane and Big Show (two superstars who are beyond their prime and the crowd is just tired of seeing again and again) eliminate all their favourites in the most dominating way possible, they could direct all the boos to them, and in turn, Reigns would get cheered for eliminating them.The pseudo final four - Kane and Big Show vs. Reigns and Ambrose. That stare down was supposed to be a moment. Sadly, no one cared. Not even Ambrose being a part of it could get the crowd to care about Big Show or Kane. WWE never learns from its mistakes. They tried it once with Orton and Cena in 2011.It is clear that the WWE hoped that by eliminating Bryan early on, the crowd would forget about him. It might have even worked. The problem this year was not that Bryan didn't win. It was that the match in itself was horribly anticlimactic, and Reigns did nothing noteworthy to earn the victory.When the crowd starts cheering Rusev on, that was classic irony. This was the exact same situation Reigns was in the previous year, when Batista was in Reigns' position.And the last ditch effort WWE could think of was for The Rock to come show his support. This makes no sense because, the last time the Rock and Reigns were on screen together, Rocky got powerbombed onto the announce table. It is not common knowledge that Rock and Reigns are related, and the only people who know that information are exactly the ones who will boo the hell out of Reigns.To summarize, Reigns got booed because his rise to the top is being forced, and comes off as artificial. Had the WWE had any brains, they'd have tried to make it more organic by building him up slowly.
How does John Cena being injured 'Hurt' World Wrestling Entertainment's Wrestlemania 32 plans?
WWE? Plans? You know they never have long-term plans. WWE is able to put on a great show with the talent they currently have, they just need to come up with the right story. Sheamus could enter a feud with Ambrose and Owens. A four-way for the IC-Title with Bray Wyatt would be a great match. Del Rio could put his US Title on the line in a Championship Scramble match with Ziggler, Neville, Ryback and Sami Zayn (who could win a Preshow Battle Royal to earn his spot). The New Day could put their Titles on the line in a Tag Team Royal Rumble where both members of a team must be eliminated. The Divas could have their match. Maybe Charlotte vs Paige vs Beckie vs Sasha. They could give Goldust and Stardust the story we've been wanting. Big Show could take on Braun Strowman, who says HE'LL make him retire. Lesnar could face The Rock (who would have eliminated Lesnar from the Rumble). Roman Reigns would face Triple H (who would've won the Rumble, after eliminating Reigns) That's 8 (9 if you include the preshow) matches that could all deliver...if they have a proper story. Undertaker isn't used, but there's not really a person for him to work with...unless they somehow give Jericho a match with him, but I don't think either want that.