Is it possible for there to be no sac at 8 weeks????
I had the same thing happen at 8 weeks. They thought that I might not be as far along as I thought I was. It is entirely possible you ovulated later than you though. My sister, unlike most women, ovulates the first week after her pregnancy. However, mine ended in miscarriage and molar pregnancy, which is very rare. However, if it is a miscarriage, you don't have to have any symptoms. They might give you a week to pass it naturally, but my doctor performed a d&c the next day to remove the tissue. I know it's impossible to say not to worry because it's all you can do. If it does end in miscarriage, it's important to know that there is nothing you could have done to prevent it. I wish you the best of luck.
Is it possible that there was incest in the Bush family?
I don't know if you actually wanted an honest answer to that question, but you're going to get one. In fact, there might be more truth to your question than you know. "Blue-Blooded" families like the British Royal Family and the Rothschilds have historically resorted to inbreeding in order to maintain their bloodline. Here are some quick excerpts I came across: "Bill Clinton's family goes back to William Henry Harrison and Benjamin Harrison, making him related to Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter. His kinship to Ford makes him 'near kin' to Richard Nixon and George Bush. Small world, isn't it?" "According to some, Bill Clinton is a descendant of the Rothschild family." Burke's publishing director, Harold Brooks-Baker says Bush's royal connections are startling. "[Bush] is closely related to every European Monarch both on and off the throne," says Brooks-Baker. Some of the governor's royal kin include Britain's Queen Elizabeth II, the Queen Mother, Duchess Sarah "Fergy" Ferguson and even the late Princess Diana. His most prominent ancestor may be England's King Charles II, who shared the governor's vision of a strong military. Going back nearly 1000 years, Brooks-Baker points out both the Bush and Pierce families [Barbara Bush's maiden name is Pierce] were high society. "Not one member of his family was working class, middle class, or even middle, middle class," he notes. Well, there you have it.
Is it possible that there are more elements in universe than what we have discovered till now in our periodic table?
Only just over 90 elements were naturally occuring on planet Earth. In the Big Bang, all the hydrogen in existence, some of the helium and some tiny amounts of lithium were created. All other elements that occur naturally were created in stars. Elements up to element 26, iron, were created in the normal nuclear fusion processes at the core of stars. Smaller stars do not produce all of the elements. The largest stars are capable of fusion resulting in elements up to 26, though, as energy is released by their formation from smaller nuclei.Beyond element 26, energy must be provided to cause nuclei to fuse together to make these elements.A supernova can provide the necessary energy to smash elements 1 to 26 together and create the heavier ones. All the heavier elements on Earth have been created that way. Most are stable isotopes, but some of the heavier elements have a mix of stable and unstable, but long lived isotopes.Once we get past the naturally occuring elements, scientists have synthesised these using high energy to smash atoms together. So far, the atoms created are all radioactive and do not have stable isotopes.It is predicted that there are even heavier elements that could have stable isotopes, if we had enough energy to make them. At the moment, our atom smashers probably do not have enough energy, but this is not likely to remain the case, and so heavier elements can be made.Perhaps stable isotopes of elements heavier than on Earth exist somewhere in the Universe, but if they do, it would be in vanishingly small amounts and so we would not be likely to detect them using our current technology for spectral analysis of starlight. Because of the extremely tiny amounts that might exist, the spectrum would not be detectable in amongst the other light.
Is it possible for there to be absolutely nothing?
Is it possible for there to be absolutely nothing?It appears to me that this question is being interpreted as "Is is possible that there is now nothing?"I interpret this question as inquiring whether it might have been that absolutely nothing existed. To which I say, yes, it could have been that way. It's lucky for us that it is not.When I was thirteen years old I attended a boy scout camp. It lasted about three days, as I remember. Late one night when only I and one other scout were seated around the campfire, I confided in him that I felt so lucky just to exist, considering that there might never have been anything: no life, no planets, no stars, no universe, no space, no time, and no energy anywhere, just nothing.He stared at me as if I was I was stark raving mad. After that, I kind of kept it to myself. But I have never stopped feeling lucky just for existing.As a side note: I was an atheist by the age of twelve. I mention it only because this concept of nothingness never seems to be accepted by theists, and the other scout was definitely a theist. In fact, I might have been the only atheist there. I was not so foolish to reveal my disbelief in all gods. I was just there for the fun.For those who believe in a god, they simply include their god in the list of things that might not have ever existed. Either way, we're very fortunate.
Is it possible that there are other planets in our solar system that we don't know about?
No. It’s very unlikely.That’s because the definition of what constitutes a planet has been so tightly defined that it now excludes Pluto and many recently discovered objects beyond.So, at the moment, there are 8 planets, the outermost being Neptune.One of the key elements of the definition of what constitutes a planet is the requirement that the object clears its orbit of debris.Whilst there are certain to be many yet-to-be-discovered objects beyond Neptune that might at first seem to meet the definition of a planet, their extreme orbits & positioning within the Kuiper belt and Oort cloud make it extremely unlikely that they’d be able to clear their orbits.But…There are thousands of known TNO’s (Trans-Neptunian objects). Some of which (such as Pluto, Sedna & Eris etc..), meet the previous, vague definition of what constitutes a ‘Planet’.Part of the reason for devising the rigorous definition of what constitutes a planet was the sheer number of objects being found beyond the orbits of Neptune and Pluto.Sadly for Pluto, the scientific definition of the term ‘Planet’ automatically excluded it, hence its demotion to being a minor planet.There are thousands of TNO’s. Many are little more than lumps of snow, ice or rock, but some are hundreds of miles in diameter. (For example, Eris is bigger than Pluto).Trans-Neptunian objectsIf there was anything that could be defined as a ninth planet within the orbit of Neptune, it would have been found by now. (Its mass would have had a measurable effect on the orbits of the other eight planets, so we’d have had a good idea of where to look for centuries!).There is a theory that there is a massive object (10 Earth masses IIRC) orbiting the Sun so far away that its ‘year’ equals 20,000 Earth-years. (By way of comparison, Pluto’s ‘year’ equals a mere 248 Earth-years!).If this were able to clear its orbit, it’d qualify as being a planet.
How is it possible that only 92 elements are found in the natural world but there are millions of different
You are confusing elements - atoms - and molecules. There are indeed 92 natural elements, H to U. Each element appears as individual atoms, such as hydrogen atoms, carbon atoms, etc. These individual atoms can and do bond with each other to make molecules, such as methane CH4, water H2O, etc. I hope you are not confused anymore.
Is it possible to have 2 tampons in one applicator?
yes. i bought a box one time that was just a bad batch. like every one had two in it. just buy a new box(:
Is it possible for there to be a tumor anywhere in your body?
I just had one taken out from Inside my bladder. I will not do details as to how they got in there..
Is it possible that there still could be an undiscovered piece of land on earth?
Two possibilities exist and one leads to another but not always.New volcanic land masses appear above the waterline periodically and it’s possible that a new one has breached since the last time a given area was surveyed.The other possibility is a known area which hasn’t been explored in memorable times. An area in Africa was identified by satellite imagery and targeted some years back for exploration as such a location. The wilderness was pristine and wildlife was thriving. It’s possible that other such remote locations exist and have not been explored in recent times. Satellite archeology focuses on finding lost habitations and settlements in remote places. Obviously a new landmass would be unexplored or at least untouched by human feet.Past that, the globe has been thoroughly mapped and photographed from space. Unless it just broke the surface recently, there are no hidden lands with giant apes or dinosaur islands to find. However those stories are still great entertainment.