If someone breaks into your house in ohio is it possible to shoot them and not go to jail?
There is no simple answer to your question, that is why you find 15 pages of detail when you try to look it up. You can use deadly force in the defense of yourself or another. If someone breaks into your house and you are in it and you shoot them in fear for your life, it may be considered self defense. But you need to understand. EVERY shooting death will be presented to a grand jury and 12 ordinary citizens will decide if what you did is right. Even if a police officer shoots someone in the line of duty it is presented to a grand jury. That being said, there is no cookie cutter situation where anytime someone breaks into your house and you shoot them you will be ok. All of the circumstances will be taken into account when the decision is made, like: where both of you were, was it a kid or adult, did they have any weapon or do something to act in a threatening manner, what was your mental state-were you in fear, etc etc etc. Bottom line, you can't sit in an easy chair with a shotgun and wait for someone to cross the threshold of your front door and drop them. Taking someones life should be your last resort. Also, it may not sound like it would bother you to shoot a burglar; but I know police officers who have had to take a life of someone who was trying to kill them. Situations where it was kill or be killed, and some of those cops are troubled years later dealing with taking a life. It is not something to do lightly.
Would you concider this a breach on a DVO?
Keep records of any correspondence and write notes of things you can't electronically record. Build a small record first, then contact the police about it saying it seems like its getting out of hand. He will eventually threaten you, and thats when you want to strike back. Cops take that very seriously. Well, they are supposed to anyway. The judge will consider this as a reconciling period until he becomes verbally violent. You put forth some type of effort to fix the situation, but it has come to him getting like he was before. Don't encourage him though. Provocation can backfire. Just listen to what he says and go on about your business. If however he becomes emboldened to physically come up and talk to you, then call the police. Men like him don't belong free. But the system is hard to get action from.
Im going to court for VC 14601.1(a) and VC 14601.5(a). Driving on suspend lic and Driving on supendedlic W/dui
Without the driver stepping forward and taking the heat for the p;roblem they caused, you very well could get jail time. It's against the law to be in the vehicle, with the keys in the ignition. Having priors is a diffenately, going to raise the stakes. You gotta get an attorney to represent you, you can be assigned a public defender. This isn't something you can defend on your own. They are no less informed than an attorney you may hire, most counties require attorneys that represent cases in the county, take turns on a rotating schedule, for public defender duty. If you really were the driver, try to plea bargin down to reckless or neg. The priors may stop you from that option, though. See, exactly why you need one, we don't know the laws completely, and each DUI situation is different. If you were not the driver, and the driver won't come forward, I think I'd have to tell my attorney that info. Nice friend, leaving you to take the problem. I don't know if they could be supeoned to court or not, it seems possible. If you have children to support, jail time may be worked out, however, your employer must agree to arrangements like that also. Again, the priors are going to be a problem. Good luck, hopefully a time will come that you will see that alcohol is causing you to suffer, and you will take the steps needed to improve yourself and your life.
What is the purpose of a complaint by the time a case reaches the summary judgement stage?
The complaint in a civil case doesn’t prove anything. After serving its initial purpose of giving notice to the defendant of the claims, it is used as a reference point to keep the case organized.As a former appeals lawyer I’m first going to take exception with your use of the phrase “record developed through discovery”. Depositions and other documents exchanged in discovery don’t ordinarily get filed in court. As I often had to explain to trial lawyers, just because a document is in your files (or attached as an exhibit to a deposition) doesn’t mean it’s part of “the record” . You have to make it part of the record, that is, the “record proper”, the one that counts on appeal: the court’s file. Before trial, the best way to make a document part of the “record proper” is to use it as an exhibit to a motion for summary judgment.In American civil procedure, the primary purpose of a motion for summary judgment is to show there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact, and therefore no need for a trial. Mere allegations of the complaint are not sufficient for this (except in the rare event the allegations were admitted in the Defendant’s answer). Just because you stated something in the complaint doesn’t make it a proven fact. However, the complaint still does have its uses.The complaint frames the argument. It determines what is relevant and material. Of all the possible claims in the world, these are the ones plaintiff chose to make, and these are the claims which the defendant chose to answer. These are the points which a moving party must show are undisputed to be entitled to summary judgment.Defensive motions for summary judgment are often motions for partial summary judgment aimed at one or more counts of the complaint. Such a motion might be titled “Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Count VII of Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint.”And finally, if you obtain summary judgment as to all the counts of the complaint, you’re done, you don’t have to worry about any other arguments or claims which were either possible or raised by lawyers in the course of argument.
How is it Democrats can insist on investigations without there being any crime?
Original Question: How is it Democrats can insist on investigations without there being any crime?Before I answer this question I will ask how the democrat investigators and their minions have so much of the baggage their own?Here are a few examples, for those who aren't aware of my Quora blog. Please read these and then continue.https://www.quora.com/profile/Tom-Byron/Byrons-Blog/Hypocrisy-explained?share=032c62dc&srid=3JBwHow do progressive rules work? by Tom Byron on Byron's BlogBarack Obama changed how NSA intercepts of Americans like Donald Trump could be sharedEDITAP Politics @AP_PoliticsBREAKING: White House announces President Donald Trump has fired FBI Director James ComeyEND EDITIn Comey’s 2016 announcement that Hillary won't be indicted[1] for her secret email server, we found the discussion of her lack of trustworthiness and mishandling of government information scandalous. When Comey said this week that Huma Abedin[2] won't be prosecuted because she had no malicious intent when she allowed her disgraced former spouse to print emails on the same lap top he was sexting with, we were stupefied! When former National Security Advisor Susan Rice said a video was to blame for the Benghazi deaths and then she was proven to have lied. She also refused to testify before congress this week about the unmasking of Gen. Flynn, we were left amazed at her hubris—yet again!How can an Attorney General meet with the spouse of a subject under active FBI investigation and no one says, “What the
What counter charge should a person file against persons who filed criminal charge but dismissed by the court
The issue is going to be to PROVE the maliciousness of the person's actions. If you were incarcerated at any time, you could file a claim for false arrest / false imprisonment. You could also go for libel / slander, and defamation of character. In order to do that, though, you have to have met the duties for filing a tort suit: 1) A duty was owed to you 2) That duty was breached 3) As a result of that breach, you suffered actual damages You could also try something in the civil court called "Malicious Prosecution"
I need help with my paper! I need journal articles.?
Binary options let users trade in currency pairs and stocks for various predetermined time-periods, minimal of which is 30 seconds. Executing trades is straightforward. The system uses user-friendly interfaces, which even an 8 years old kid, can operate without having to read any instructions. But winning trades is Not easy. Binary trading is advertised as the only genuine system that lets users earn preposterous amounts of money in ridiculously short period of time. Advertisers try to implicate as if you can make $350 every 60 seconds; if it was true then binary trading would truly be an astonishing business. However, does it make any sense? Can every trader make tons of money in binary trading? Who is actually paying all the money or the profit to traders? The first challenge is finding a trustworthy binary broker; secondly, you need to find a binary trading strategy, which you can use to make profits consistently. Without an effective trading strategy, there is no way you can make money in this business. Learning a profitable trading strategy is possible, You should watch this presentation video https://tr.im/16635 It's probably the best way to learn how to win with binary option
If you break a restraining order can & how long are you in jail?
Depends on what the person did to break it...... was there violence involved when the order was broke? IF the restrain e as you put it was calling the restrained person, then they violated the order themselves... they too have to abide by the order as well as the person who has the order to stay away! Police will not do anything for phone calls unless threats were made... and if it goes back to court... same unless threats were made......... What good is a restraining order if your going to contact the person your trying to restain???? Sounds like you have very loveing Grandparents...... have you tried talking to them about your stress and how all this is making you feel? as a parent and grandparent myself I can tell you they will be very concerned and will want to support you and make any changes they can to protect and support you. Or maybe try talking to your dad if you can.. let him know how it is making you feel. Talking with someone, even if its a complete stranger about your stress and what bothers/hurts you will make you feel better. Be carefull about shareing things with your friends as they can later use to hurt you, if they should no longer be your friends... 13 is a very vunerable age. You must remember YOU ARE NOT AT FAULT for any of THIER PROBLEMS. And the problems your dad has with your mom is just that THIER PROBLEMS, due to THIER ACTIONS! I encourage you to talk to someone, hopefully your grandparents about it....or maybe start keeping a jornal, good way to let stress out.......... stay focused in school, i know it may be a chalenge but well worth it. Learn from your experience with your dad and mom. Try to stay positive. My heart goes out to you.. I wish you the best of luck.....
I didnt go to court what happends now?
Depends, if it is something simple like a traffic ticket, civil infraction and some misdemenors you'll be issued a bench warrent. A bench warrent is like the next time you run into the police and they run your license you'll be arrested on the spot. If it is more than a traffic ticket, civil infraction and some misdemenors you'll be hunted like a dog.