Rolling Stones or Nirvana?
Both bands have their share of good and bad music. The Rolling Stones have a lot of good songs, but Nirvana is a better band overall. Although, I'm sure that we might have gotten sick of Nirvana if they were around for a long time like The Rolling Stones.
The Beatles or Rolling Stones or Ramones?
First off I was 15 when the Beatles and Stones came out and being raised on the blues, I have to go with the Stones, as their style of music is based on the blues, and the Beatles never did the blues at all, and the Ramones who I like were inspired by The Stones. I'm into rock and not pop/rock that much and the Beatles are or I should say were pop/rock. Just as Paul still is today. I am a fan of Harrison and Lennon. take care dave
The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles vs. The Who?
Just pick your favorite out of each 3 The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles vs. The Who? Deep Purple vs. Led Zeppelin vs. Black Sabbath? Elton John vs. David Bowie vs. Queen? Genesis vs. Pink Floyd vs. Yes? Megadeth vs. Metallica vs. Slayer? Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam vs. Soundgarden? Ramones vs. The Clash vs. Sex Pistols? The Velvet Underground vs. The Stooges vs. New York Dolls? Van Halen vs. AC/DC vs. Guns N' Roses? Death vs. Morbid Angel vs. Deicide?
What did Kurt Cobain think of the Ramones?
He's like "man, I love how all their songs sound exactly the same, I wish I could write songs like that" and a few years later Nirvana was born.
The Ramones vs. the Beatles?
Hands down Ramones. 6k concerts can't be overlooked. Neither can the fact that there are thousands of beatles cover bands, and not one good Ramones one. No one can sing like Joey Ramone. NOBODY.