Using suitable examples , discuss the rationale for studying politics?
better to choose a course of study that will not be a total waste of your parents money!!!
What is the significance of studying politics?
The majority of answers here seem to explain why studying politics academically is significant, others provide personal anecdotes as to why they like politics, very few address, what I assume, is the question-Why Should One Study Politics?I assume the questioner is from a liberal democracy, yes?The majority of nations today are setup as such. Unlike other forms of government, in a democracy, the seat of power is not held up by such pillars as military, aristocracy or clergy. Instead, the throne is placed directly in the hands of the population, and the people may decide who sits upon the mighty throne. In a sense, there is no sovereign (leader) rather, the people act as the de facto sovereign of the nation. Making decisions on everything from who the leader will be for the next 4 years, to what colour the new hospital in X city is going to be.The determination of whether a democracy functions as intended or not, depends entirely on whether the populace is politically literate or not. That a voting citizen must know the inner working of policy and what must be done to secure the nation’s interests.This is perhaps it’s greatest weakness. Many of it’s greatest critics have cited this as a primary reason for opposing it. While democracy hopes that the collective opinions of the populace combine into some sort of wisdom. The cynics realise that not every man is fit to vote, and that not every person will take the time, or have the intelligence to positively contribute. If you were on a ship, would you want the navigator to be the Admiral of a Navy, or a collection people; some who vaguely know what they are doing, and some who are clueless?Perhaps it is impossible for it to be as intended. But the very least a citizen can do, is to accept the power their hands hold and properly understand the concepts with which they play. To have a vague understanding is better than being clueless. Perhaps if all citizens understood their responsibility, then we could avoid these frivolous games of popularity, and choose proper, and worthy leaders instead of liars whom ride the tides of popular opinion to win elections.The Study of politics is not a hobby, nor is it a profession.It is the duty of every citizen of a democracy to study politics.
Rationale behind using onion root tips and ascaris eggs in studying cell division?
Onion root tip is easily available and is easy to process Ascaris egg(fertilized) has only two large sized chromosome, and this makes it suitable for the study of chromosomes and cell division
Rationale vs. Abstract?
They are slightly different things. Pretty much all research papers have an abstract, but not all of them have a rationale. Here is the difference: * An abstract is a short section at the start of the paper (normally no more than 250 words or so), and is designed to be a summary of the whole thing- so in very brief terms, it explains what you were researching, what you did, what the results were, and what conclusions you drew from it. It should be short and concise, and explain basically the most important aspects of the paper. * The rational is a separate section that explains, basically, the rationale for the research you did. So it will cover why it is an important area of research, why your method was chosen, and what it was intended to tell you. It's worth mentioning that in most papers, the rationale is not a separate section, and is just part of the introduction. Here's an example: suppose I was writing a paper on a new cancer treatment that I had tested. Here's what each section would say: * The abstract would mention the very basics of the new treatment, how it was tested, what the results were, and what they said about the treatment. * The rationale would talk about why a new treatment was needed, and why my treatment was worth investigating. Maybe there are not good existing treatments for this cancer, or there is the potential to reduce side effects with my new treatment, etc- the rationale would explain all this.
Is political science a science like physics or chemistry are sciences?
It is a science because it tests hypotheses about political behavior and institutional performance with both quantitative (statistics) and qualitative methods. Many of it's theoretical models and methodologies are derived from economics, which is another behavioral science that tries to understand economic behavior and the performance of economic systems.Think of it like this, psychology is the science that tries to understand how the brain works, how people make decisions, etc. but people don't exist in a vacuum, but in groups. As such, sociology is the science of trying to understand behavior of groups and how individual behavior interacts with socially shared norms and group behavior. But these groups also do not exist in a vacuum, but are influenced by formal and informal constraints and incentives that are derived from political institutions. This level of analysis is called political behavior. The kinds of questions that political scientist ask are things like "why do countries go to war," "does deterrence theory work," "do term limits undermine the quality of legislation," "why do states fail," "why do some democracies have 80 percent turnout but others only have about 50"? These are questions aimed at trying to understanding, describing, and possibly predicting patterns of political behavior.The biggest limitation to political science is its limited ability to do experimental designs with control and experimental groups (you can't really crash a nation's economy just because you are curious to see if the state fails or if it goes to war, for example). But the hard sciences don't always use experimental designs either. Astronomers, for example, can't set up a control and experimental group in which they collapse stars of different sizes to see which ones yield a black hole. Instead, their data comes from observing events that happened outside the lab in the "real" world and testing hypotheses with statistical tools. Another example would be that a biologist can't just decide to alter an ecosystem to see if a particular species would go extinct. In all of these cases there are practical and ethical limitations to such an approch. And even when the natural sciences do conduct experimental studies, they will still use pretty much the same statistical tools that social scientists use when looking at the world outside the lab to check their laboratory findings.
Why do we need to study international relations?
International relations, or relations among nations, describe how different countries interact with each other. The reasons for those interactions could be political, economic or strategic.We study anything, while we are at that, to develop an understanding about the subject. It could be out of pure desire to learn something one doesn’t know already, i.e. for the sake of knowing.The other, more relevant reason today, especially for professionals - public or private - is to be able to make better informed decisions.So, whether two nations interact with each other merely to outwit each other for maximising their own national intersts(the Realist theory of International Relations) or to establish a cooperative synergy so that all benefit after making suitable compromises(the Idealist/Liberal theory of International Relations), can only be talked, discussed, debated and utilised when we study about it. We would need scholars who develop their ideas about how the International System is working, what were the mistakes committed in the past and what could be done to make a better furure.This is a very simplistic idea behind studying international relations and the examples I provided are extremely elementary ones. Of course today, with the arrival of non-conventional actors like Multi-national companies, international NGOs, transnational and supranational entities and terrorist groups, the structure of the international politics has completely changed from when it started off as an autonomous discipline of study. That is probably one more crucial reason to study it - to make updates and alterations in line with the current times.
How do i write a rationale for a lab report in psychology?
The rationale is the section where you state why what you are studying is important (the reason or purpose of the study, essentially). Studies are conducted for a variety of reasons, e.g., to glean new information, to exactly replicate an existing study, or to replicate an existing study with additional variables examined. You say you are going to replicate the Bower study. Replication is the key to the support of any worthwhile theory. Replication involves the process of repeating a study using the same methods, different subjects, and different experimenters. It can also involve applying the theory to new situations in an attempt to determine the generalizability to different age groups, locations, races, cultures, etc. Replication, therefore, is important for a number of reasons, including (1) assurance that results are valid and reliable; (2) determination of generalizability or the role of extraneous variables; (3) application of results to real world situations; and (4) inspiration of new research combining previous findings from related studies. Your rationale should explain why you deem it important to replicate the original study, building upon the appropriate information I mentioned above.
QUESTON ABOUT WWII PLEASE HELP ME, IM STUDYING FOR A TEST.?
Title: A Half-Century of Crisis and Achievement: The World i... Why were the western democracies unable to stop aggressive dictators? ... Social Studies Standard # 3 World History – Commencement: Study of the major social, political, .... Develops thesis statement with accurate reasons, details, and examples. ... Knowledge of World War I and the world in the early 20th century. ... www.connected-learning.org/Products/jw... - 32k - Similar pages http://www.connected-learning.org/Produc... World War II: West's Encyclopedia of American Law (Full Arti... On one side stood the Western democracies, led by Britain, France, ...... of the Soviet Union began in 1940, following the French surrender, for three reasons. .... not a brutal dictator, was surprised by the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor . ..... but was unable to stop the Allied debacle in the “battle of France. ... www.answers.com/topic/world-war-ii - 805k - Similar pages http://www.answers.com/topic/world-war-i... History of Western civilization - Wikipedia, the free encycl... In 1961 the handful of Portuguese troops garrisoned in Goa were unable to prevent ..... Most Western European nations had some degree of democracy, and two new ..... There were several reasons for this. Firstly, World War II had ..... in Western Europe fell in 1975, when Francisco Franco, dictator