ONLINE DATING what have your experiences been?
i attempted all of it of two situations. It replaced into an incredibly low element for me haha. the two adult men looked incredibly beneficial on the outdoors, super to talk to etc... yet there is something approximately on line relationship that, once you eventually meet them, incredibly initiate relationship, first of all: a million. it style of looks such as you have not got something to talk approximately given which you have already revealed plenty approximately your self from months or regardless of of on line/telephone conversations. 2. it incredibly is plenty greater handy to conceal who you incredibly are on line... no longer so good. 3. it incredibly is greater handy to get cheated on, given which you do no longer comprehend who else stated individual is chatting with - and does not inevitably stop chatting with once you're "relationship". i do no longer comprehend - it incredibly is in simple terms no longer honest adequate for me... And it incredibly is style of ordinary whilst human beings ask the type you met. i will under no circumstances do it back, yet those are in simple terms my own dangle ups... i think of on line relationship can entice individuals that have not got many social skills in actual existence, and that's a actual downer once you hit actual existence. So subsequent time a gaggle of giggly girlfriends come to a determination they opt for to place a profile of me, or another unsuspecting soul on line, i will gladly decline and warn others.
What have been your experiences with Scientology?
http://www.xenu.net/ contains all the information you need. It's an evil cult designed to make money and nothing else . Its effects on believers are destructive. Read "the road to xenu" - http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Library/Shelf... - an account of a girl who escaped scientology after 12 years! The cult's core belief - no, I am not kidding here! - in the words of the founder: "The head of the Galactic Federation (76 planets around larger stars visible from here) (founded 5,000,000 years ago, very space opera) solved overpopulation (250 billion or so per planet, 178 billion on average) by mass implanting. He caused people to be brought to Teegeeack (Earth) and put an H-Bomb on the principal volcanos (Incident II) and then the Pacific area ones were taken in boxes to Hawaii and the Atlantic area ones to Las Palmas and there "packaged". His name was Xenu. He used renegades. Various misleading data by means of circuits etc. was placed in the implants. When through with his crime loyal officers (to the people) captured him after six years of battle and put him in an electronic mountain trap where he still is. "They" are gone. The place (Confederation) has since been a desert. The length and brutality of it all was such that this Confederation never recovered. The implant is calculated to kill (by pneumonia etc) anyone who attempts to solve it. This liability has been dispensed with by my tech development. One can freewheel through the implant and die unless it is approached as precisely outlined. The "freewheel" (auto-running on and on) lasts too long, denies sleep etc and one dies. So be careful to do only Incidents I and II as given and not plow around and fail to complete one thetan at a time. In December 1967 I knew someone had to take the plunge. I did and emerged very knocked out, but alive. Probably the only one ever to do so in 75,000,000 years. I have all the data now, but only that given here is needful. One's body is a mass of individual thetans stuck to oneself or to the body. One has to clean them off by running incident II and Incident I. It is a long job, requiring care, patience and good auditing. You are running beings. They respond like any preclear. Some large, some small. Thetans believed they were one. This is the primary error. Good luck."
What have been your experiences with meditation?
Clearly, there is no such thing as a common definition of ‘meditation’ when you read the myriad answers that will come, and are already existing for other similar questions on Quora. However, we can say that there are generally three types of meditation practices. You can see my extensive discussions about these three types in my other answers, just click on my name at the top of this answer.Answering from a purely experiential point of view would be a disservice to those who are looking to learn meditation, or even to compare. These various techniques will produce various experiences. And even various experiences that happen using one technique may not tell you what is really happening in terms of benefits being developed. The experiences of a novice may not have any seeming relationship to those of someone who has achieved a great deal of development by using the same technique, yet both can be correct.This is why it’s far better to talk about what kind of benefits are developed, and to what strength these benefits can be shown by scientific research. Again, take a look at a number of my answers on this point of benefits, and remember that scientific results on one technique have no relevance to the benefits derived from another technique. Be sure to compare research on both techniques, don’t assume that results found using technique “A” means you’ll get the same or even similar results from technique “B.” That is a fundamentally flawed assumption that is commonly implied by promoters, particularly those who haven’t had any significant research done on their particular technique.By far the biggest benefit one can get from a technique is growth of the fundamental capacity of consciousness in one’s awareness. In other words, one develops steadiness of awareness and depth of awareness as a result of regular practice, ultimately establishing the awareness from within the SELF. This is SELF-realization. This is just becoming fully aware of one’s essential being. And there is only one way to do that — bring the attention to the SELF directly and become familiar with it. The sooner the better. Anything less than that is dabbling, dawdling on small things.And anyone who tells you it’s hard to do simply is going about it the hard way. Your own essential SELF is not so far away.
What have been your experiences with horse boots such as "Easyboot"?
I kept my Paint mare shod last summer when we were showing, but it's going to be difficult to properly shoe her this year. I live in a very rural area, and there's only one good farrier here. He's so busy he won't travel anymore. Therefore I'm going to have to either haul an hour each way to have my mare's hooves shod at his place, or else go 8 weeks between shoeing (he'll come to a big Morgan barn nearby for a full day's work, but they are able to leave their horse's hooves much longer between resetting than I can) I am considering trying "Easyboots" or another similiar brand of hoof protectors for my horse instead of shoes. I won't show in them - the arenas are normally okay, anyhow. I just want protection for all our other riding. I would still get this farrier to trim my horse every 8 weeks, and in between I could touch up her hooves myself (I've done simple hoof trims for years) Any advice on good brands?Problems? Disadvantages of boots? Comparisions from one to another?
Great Dane owners: what have your good and bad experiences been?
I currently have 2 Great Danes and have had 2 others, I actually normally have 3 at a time so I'm sure by now you've realized I'm going to be saying mostly good things about them! The bad---Some drool. My female was 3 when I adopted her and had her spayed and she is VERY hard headed. Some people have said blacks and mantels are stubborn, some people say it's because she was spayed so late. I ended up sending her to a professional trainer for 2 1/2 weeks to learn her advanced manners. I could have done it myself but it would probably have taken me longer and I was just being lazy. They fart a lot. It's not their diet, I have a friend that only feeds RMB and her Danes are fart machines too. Mine really don't seem to have bad behaviors. All 4 of my Danes were rescued adults and it's my philosophy that if a dog is not meant for breeding or showing, or something else that requires specific training from puppy-hood, it is always best to rescue. Yes there are reasons to get puppies but pet Danes are always needing rescue from people who "didn't realize how big they would get" or suddenly have to move or something. If anything you know MORE about a rescue Dane as temperament is known and by 2 most major health problems would have been evident. And now, the good. OMG I've never known such loving dogs in my life!! I used to breed Great Pyrenees and I've had many other breeds through the years but I will never be Dane-less ever again. They are smart, eager to please, friendly, social, mostly kid safe (my female is cranky sometimes if she's trying to take a nap) and they are great protectors of the home. They don't shed as heavily as other average breeds, and due to their Greyhound lineage their hair is mostly short and fine so what does get shed won't kill your vacuum cleaner. I really can't sing the praises enough of this breed of dogs. For most Dane lovers, the bigger the better. These guys are 100% cuddle bugs and you'll be amazed to find out that yes you really can have a 130+ lbs dog sitting in your lap and breathe at the same time. And I've rambled on long enough, but I wanted to give you a thorough answer. You can also get more from dogbreedinfo.com and various other Great Dane clubs and rescues you'll find in a Google search. Check petfinder.com for rescues near you! Good luck!
What have people's experiences been with TagMan?
Disclosure: I was early in, at TagMan and now work for Ensighten.TagMan was acquired by Ensighten in March, giving marketers the added power of the Ensighten Agile Marketing Platform. Customers can now collect, own and act on data from everywhere providing personalised web experiences in real-time to consumers on any device or marketing channel. To hear what our "customers" say rather than my own sales-pitch, you can visit: Videos | Ensighten .
What is the best fox hunting rifle and why? How is the rifle made?
Typically, you would want to trap a fox. Trapping can be a good way of earning income on pelts and such if you live in the right area, it provides an excellent challenge, and it is pretty exhilarating to walk through the woods checking your traps. They tend to be humane traps that don’t harm the animal…you know, until you shoot it. It obviously requires some bait and a chunk of land owned or permitted to use for trapping purposes.Becoming A TrapperIf you want to go out and find a fox, I guess use a .22lr, as most have said here. A Marlin model 60 is great, so is literally any Henry rifle in .22 caliber. I’m personally biased towards Savage arms though; I’ve had a .22 Savage my dad got me since I was 6 and it’s only ever misfired notoriously shitty ammunition that I no longer use in it, and has been consistently accurate and sturdy.Savage ArmsThis is the rifle I would recommend; it’s the most similar Savage still in production to mine, that I could find. You can’t go wrong. Plus, that wooden stock is plain sexy.As for how the rifle is made, others have answered that better than I could explain it.
First hunting rifle!!?
.270 Winchester and .30-06 Springfield are perfectly adequate for elk. There's no need for you to get a magnum cartridge and wind up hating it. .308 Winchester or 7mm-08 are a little light in my opinion, but they'll suffice. The key with hunting, especially with larger game like elk, is proper bullet selection and proper shot placement. Obviously you can't expect kill an elk with a .22LR, but .30-06 was used for years quite effectively before magnum cartridges became all the rage. Get a .30-06 or .270 Win, choose a good bullet for large game, and practice until you're accurate. As for the bullet, I'd suggest something that uses Nosler Partition, Swift A-Frame, or any other good-quality bonded bullet. Yes, they're more expensive than pointed soft point, but they work better in larger game such as elk. Bullet weight is important, too- the heavier the better for elk. The 7mm Remington Magnum produces about 20 pounds of felt recoil, which is comparable to a .30-06, whereas a .270 Winchester produces about 17 pounds of felt recoil. As a comparison, a .300 Winchester Magnum produces over 24 pounds of felt recoil. A 7mm-08 or 7.62x54R produces about 14 pounds of felt recoil. I would strongly recommend that you choose .270 Winchester, .30-06 Springfield, or at the very upper limit, a 7mm Remington Magnum. You need to shoot some of these rifles to determine if you can handle them, and if you can, go for it. One other suggestion from my personal experience: Savage makes a shoulder pad that they call the Personal Anti-recoil Device, or P.A.D. (what a creative name, right?), which is available on some of their rifles. My Savage in .270 Winchester is extremely easy on my shoulder- I barely felt any discomfort whatsoever after firing 10 rounds in about 20 minutes while sighting it in. If you can find a Savage 111 in .270 Winchester like mine, you'll do fine with it. Alternately, you can throw a Limb Saver recoil pad onto the rifle, but that doesn't look as nice as a built-in recoil reduction device like the P.A.D.
What has been your experience with Amazon's AWS vs. IBM's Bluemix in terms of web hosting with Node.js?
The company I worked for previously hosted a node app on Bluemix because our client was trying to get in good with IBM people. We insisted on AWS since that’s what we used for all our other projects, but since the customer is always right, we went ahead and configured Bluemix for the project. Long story short, the client had us move the project over to AWS.