TRENDING NEWS

POPULAR NEWS

What do you think about Islamization of Europe by the EU

What do you think about Islamization of Europe by the EU?

I'm from Poland,
Chancellor 4th Reich, O Beg me pardon Chancellor of Federal Republic of Germany Angela Merkel tried to boss EU to relocate so called Refuges, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Austria strongly oppose it.

Many Poles think that our country did very bad geopolitical decision by helping Holly Roman Empire of German Nation to repeal Ottoman Empire from gates of Vienna instead allying with Sultan Mehmed IV of Ottomans against Germany.
Poland and Turkey could **** German Reich together and let Muslim to culturally enrich Europe, Germany, and their gene pools earlier :-)

Is the Islamization of Europe the true reason behind the EU countries' staunch anti-Israeli, pro-Arab policies?

There are no pro Arab policies in European mainstream polity that I have noticed, and as a Jew I feel sure I'd have noticed.

There are however many European Jews who feel disgusted, embarrased and ashamed at the activities if Zionists. If this has given the impression that there is some mainsteam anti semetic feeling, that is regrettable but mistaken.

What do you think of the immigration problem in Europe?

How Europe is handling the immigration problem definitely needs addressing and I have no plan to discuss this here or in the future. Really because it been left to reach such a point now that it will take literally years to first come up with a suitable solution and years more to implement it. What is clear is that unhindered access to European countries is starting to have a negative effect both on the citizens of those countries and the people heading there looking for a better life.

What I find ironic is that you have groups like ISIS, Al qaeda and other radical Muslim groups fighting the West and espousing the virues of Islam, yet their countrymen are fleeing their propaganda and heading to the very countries ISIS and their ilk are warning about. Talk about a failure in policy application. If creating cohesion and support against Western Deocracy is the goal of groups like ISIS they couldn't have hit further off the mark. I'd be asking 'if the west is so evil why are the majority of your countrymen heading to the very places you are trying to gain support against'. Sure, they will pick up a few radical supporters here and there but if they wanted popular support they missed the mark completely, pardon the pun.

If I was the leader of ISIS or Al qaeda I'd be calling all my generals in and saying: 'look boys we really fucked this up and need to take a different direction'. Honestly. if blowing shit up worked people would love the US not think they are a bunch of loud-mouth bullies. If you want support you will never ever, ever win by fear. If you truly want poplular support you need to make yourself more appealling and more properous for people not the other way around.

Ask any of the famous dictators of the past few hundred years and they will tell you that fear only works for so long. Eventually even the most timid sheep will turn around and butt back.

Will the rise of nationalism in Europe mean the end of the EU?

Nothing good ever came out of nationalism in Europe… except the EU!

The rise of nationalism is definitely a threat to the EU. We have seen it with Brexit. Thankfully the Netherlands didnt follow the same path. France is coming next (in two weeks). Then Italy and Germany.

Europe has known an incredible number of wars… until we started the economic cooperation and the EU.

I believe in the power of exchange and integration. When people exchange, they are more likely to know, understand and rely on each other. Economic cooperation raises the stakes and make the price to pay for an armed conflict too high that nobody has any interest in it. Sure, Europe has other problems, but it is still one of the biggest economy in the world. What Europe needs is more Europe, not less. We have a rich history and we need to stand for our values in order to keep them. Divided, we are weak (divide to better reign applies here).

Europe Migrant Crisis: Do you think the migrants should've stayed in the first safe country they got to, or should they be allowed to "shop around" for countries that are more prosperous and generous?

Migrants should be lucky they are in Europe to begin with. Asylum does not mean you shop around looking for the best deal you can get.

Beggars can't be choosers!!! Any of these safe Euro countries IS economically and physically better than the shit holes they came from to start a new life (Syria, Sudan, etc.).They are just being greedy at this point. If you are a refugee, you should take refuge in the first safe country you arrive and make the best of it... Then when you get legal status-- go country shop like the rest of the EU does. 

Poland and anyone else on a legal EU work visa has a right to migrate to a richer place. Migrants on the other hand should just be grateful they landed on European shores with no bombs over them. They are just trying to score the biggest handout aka Germany and refuse to make the most of being in a non-western War torn country.

At least the Central American migrants who land in the border states of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, etc don't "State" shop. They typically take whatever work is immediately given to them in the state they land and/or do something entrepreneurial (aka not a handout). I think they know that even though they landed in an economically depressed state-- its better than Juarez (or whatever destitute place they came from) and work their butt off for a better life.

It seems the new wave of European migrants are just being crazy greedy and ungrateful that they are in Europe to begin with. They should take a lesson from the American migrants or legal migration from Ellis Island. You have to register when you first land on shore... Seems like these European migrants want to cheat the system and shop around.

Are these migrants really fleeing from persecution if you traveled through 6 safe countries that are economically and politically more stable than yours to get to the richest one? Sorry-- you're just shopping at that point.

Should the EU and the US pay Greece to accept migrants, helping to alleviate their debt crisis and the migrant issue?

The US has no obligation to aid Greece in this matter.

Claims that the US should pay Greece because Greece has a problem are absurd, and have zero chance of winning support inside the US.

Further, such claims cause Greece to be seen in a highly negative light, and make it less likely that Americans would support voluntary assistance. Culturally, Americans place a high value on personal responsibility. Any attempts by the Greek government to pressure the US into paying Greece will lead to a large scale public backlash in the US against Greece.

Pairing this with an implicit thread to send illegal immigrants to the US would most likely result in American military and diplomatic action to insure that these threats are not acted on. Likely actions would include a ban on entry to the country by holders of Greek passports, and significant barriers to Greek ships docking in US ports, possibly including blockades of Greek ports, depending on how such an invasion was threatened by Greece.

Questions like this one support the negative narrative that Greece is unwilling to solve its own problems, which is highly counter productive for those within Greece who seek to address the problems.

TRENDING NEWS