Democrats, do you agree with Obama?
That is absolutely, categorically false. There are some Democrats who do this, probably just as many who do this in the Republican party. We tend to judge the other side more than ourselves. So, as a measure of solidarity, I am going to be one-hundred percent honest with you and say that absolutely freaking not do I agree with everything he has done. I will give you one example. I think it's safe to say Bill Maher is a Democrat with liberal politics. He used to say he's a Libertarian but it's obvious that that's only on social issues, not fiscal ones. I was watching his show and he and Rachel Madow for that matter! started defending Fast and Furious which I found absolutely atrocious. They seemed to write it off as a Republican attack without acknowledging the massive moral shortcomings of the project. They betrayed their liberal ideals for the "good of the party" I suppose which is a massive pile of horseshit in my opinion. So this would be an example of Democrats who towed the party line, while I on the other hand found this program massively disgusting. Oddly however, Republicans were not in the clear on this issue. They seemed to be less concerned with the border agent who died and more concerned with the conspiracy theory that Obama was using this event to come for their guns...absolutely sick on both sides. I don't know if this really counts as me "agreeing" with Obama since it is unclear if the White House had any knowledge of this particular program, but I think you get the drift. Many Democrats who have been polled, I am sure, have said they disapproved of the President (I'm one of them), but this is due to a betrayal, in my mind, of humanistic principles, not because I'm all of a sudden now going to vote Republican. Partisanship is stupid-ship. I would encourage you not to vote party either, but when the guy aligns with you more than the other guy who has a shot to win...what else you gonna do? I'll vote for him. Pretty sure. But noooooooooooo, to say I agree with them because he's got a donkey on the ticket is ludicrous.
I think in the first year they were had those dreams, but they are fading now. Obama is being shown for what he really was, and his legacy is rapidly dissolving. Only the most diehard fans still cling to his little Kenyan coattails. His trademark legislation: Obamacare, is going up another 40% this year for many citizens, and the Democrats just cant tell enough lies to make it Trump's fault. Kim Jong Un laughed at the weakness of Obama, but responded to Trump. The world that got used to pushing America around for 8 years, sit up and listen now. They know that Obama was weak, passive, and easy. Those in the FBI, NSA, CIA, and other high places that believed in Obama are now beginning to realize...he's gone, and their actions are being uncovered. Nobody will stand by them.
Is there at least one honorable Democrat here who will denounce Obama's tax cheat friends?
"it rather is like whilst Rosie O'Donnell and Oprah Winfrey lecturing us on the thank you to stay slender." human beings in all ranges of government ought to steer by utilising occasion. None of those tax cheats ought to additionally be serving; i do no longer care how vast their brains are (or are gave the impression to be.) If this grew to become right into a republican administration there could be demonstrators interior the streets. If Geithner & Rangel anticipate us to have self assurance they are in a position to't save song of their very very own taxes, (it rather is, for sure finished B.S.) how can all of us heavily anticipate them to maintain watch over a three trillion greenback budget? i would not have faith the two of those crooks with my pocket-replace. "there's a huge distinction between people who cheat on their taxes and individuals how make an errors and then maximum appropriate by utilising paying what's owed and regardless of outcomes are due." I understand if it rather is one individual on Barry's administration yet once you have many, how are you able to have faith them.
I’m going with the Republicans on Lesser of Two Evils grounds.Libertarians want everyone to have the freedom to do what they want without government interference, provided that they don’t abridge the rights of others. Sounds great, right? And Libertarianism is great if you are a prosperous property owner with responsible neighbors.But what if you aren’t? The Libertarian Party platform:Can’t prevent your airliner from hurtling to the ground because nobody did any maintenance on the plane for the past 17 years. Too bad! We don’t recommend that you fly THAT airline again!Calls for NO restrictions on the private ownership of weapons. Hand grenades? Sure! Pipe bombs? No problem! Chemical weapons? Check!Suggests the end of public education. This is fine if you don’t have children, if you home school them or can afford to send them to a private school. But what if you can’t? Does our society benefit from having an entire class of people who have no education? Stupid.Removes the social safety net for poor people. Is grandma dying of a curable disease? Jeez, sorry. Is little Izabella hungry because you weren’t able to feed her dinner last night? Sucks to be her!Provides for no government oversight of civil rights. Discriminated against in housing, lending or a job? TOO BAD! Suck it up!Advocates against consumer protections. Are the Chinese putting melamine in the dog food again? So sad! Fluffy was a good dog. Be happy that you had the liberty to watch her die!Libertarianism is not any kind of panacea in the richest country in the world. If it is such as good idea, why have none of the 200 or so nations in the world tried it?Here is the official Libertarian Party Platform.
Is there at least one honorable Democrat here who will denounce Obama's tax cheat friends?
"it rather is like whilst Rosie O'Donnell and Oprah Winfrey lecturing us on the thank you to stay slender." human beings in all ranges of government ought to steer by utilising occasion. None of those tax cheats ought to additionally be serving; i do no longer care how vast their brains are (or are gave the impression to be.) If this grew to become right into a republican administration there could be demonstrators interior the streets. If Geithner & Rangel anticipate us to have self assurance they are in a position to't save song of their very very own taxes, (it rather is, for sure finished B.S.) how can all of us heavily anticipate them to maintain watch over a three trillion greenback budget? i would not have faith the two of those crooks with my pocket-replace. "there's a huge distinction between people who cheat on their taxes and individuals how make an errors and then maximum appropriate by utilising paying what's owed and regardless of outcomes are due." I understand if it rather is one individual on Barry's administration yet once you have many, how are you able to have faith them.
Obama/Hillary dividing Democratic America?
No !!! He can not do any worse than the Democrats !!! Democrats ought to renowned that because of the fact the 73rd Congress in 1933, for a majority of THE final sixty 5 YEARS, Democratic residences of Representatives and Democratic Senates have controlled the country and the President. a entire of 38 training with Democrats on top of issues for 28 of those! we ought to tell/tell our political representatives that we ought to bypass a Constitutional replace for the line merchandise VETO. this could save the particular interest rubbish from being linked to useful law. If Congress needs to grant the president that potential, they are going to ought to bypass a constitutional replace, perfect Justice John Paul Stevens suggested. "If there is to be a clean technique wherein the president will play a various function in determining the textual content fabric of what could grow to be a regulation, such replace ought to come not by using law yet with the aid of the replace concepts set forth in Article V of the form," Stevens suggested, on June twenty 5th, 1998. in the experience that your particular interest is SO useful, why do you should hide it in useful law? So, with them REFUSING to bypass the line merchandise Veto, truthfully, the domicile and Senate have truly been controlling the country!! AND, with the present Senate and Congress having the WORST approval score in history, with a bit of luck we can see a lot of ameliorations after the final elections. a modern-day Reuters ballot is out and Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have pulled an upset: they have controlled to make George Walker Bush two times as called CONGRESS. those days - - only 13% of possibly electorate now say the DEMOCRATICALLY controlled Congress is doing a competent or impressive job. the maximum modern Rasmussen comments national telephone survey got here across that 40 3% supply Congress a bad score. those effects characterize a mild decrease from final month, while 15% gave Congress a competent or impressive score. Democrats usually have self assurance in heavy fines for trustworthy paintings, at the same time as helpful sloth and indulgence. Do you think of that individuals ought to be waiting to do honestly not something effective and get government hand-outs for sloth and indulgence - healthcare, tobacco, alcohol, drugs, STDs, and so on. ?? do you opt for to have YOUR funds TAKEN from YOU and your loved ones to FINANCE those people ??? .
Yes.Lt General Michael T Flynn has been variously described as a genius and the “best intelligence officer of his era”. His peers identified him early on as “the guy” that would advance. When he moved from a theatre based position to head of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) things went sideways.The best descriptor I’ve heard is that Flynn suffered from “Target Lock”, he saw organized Islamic Terror Cells everywhere he looked, even when the raw data indicated otherwise. He was particularly combative and frequently fought with the heads of the other agencies and this created some morale issues at DIA.When Flynn was asked to step down at DIA it is generally assumed that the head of NSA was in agreement as was the Sec Def, the NDI and the NSAdvisor. Flynn had run out of friends.There are stories that Obama and Flynn were at odds personally but this seems unlikely since their positions would have little interaction. Flynn would have fallen under the Sec Def and the Director of NSA (the Intel aggregator) and would have been insulated from the President by the National Director of Intelligence and the National Security Advisor. Those two positions actually brief the President not the individual Directors of the 20-odd intel agencies.So Gen Flynn was considered temperamental and also bad at managing large numbers of civilians. This was the gist of what President Obama imparted to President Trump. By this point Flynn had made some decisions as a civilian that had put him in a compromising position. This only added to the underlying chaos involved with hiring General Flynn.Trump didn’t listen and that caused him problems he didn’t need. This set up a pattern that has repeated over and over.
It is quite entertaining reading all the responses to this question (let alone the question with the false premise). Is the question assuming that the GOP has been losing the last 8 years and is now finally getting the nail in the coffin, or is the question assuming that the GOP has been on a tear the last 8 years pretty much sweeping seats across the country except for the ONE that has the biggest visibility?The GOP has swept seats across the country in local, state, and federal elections, and hold majorities in both houses. The GOP base punished the national GOP establishment in 2012 and let Obama win because they forced a RINO (again) on them and didn’t offer a conservative. Look at the stats - the GOP has replaced over 1,000 democrat seats across the country since 2009.Everyone on Quora seems to think that the GOP has been on the fritz and Trump is the final act of destruction. But if you were to redo the premise as: is Trump reversing the gains made by the GOP in the last 8 years? then my answer is I’m not sure. It can either be:A final push to “peak GOP” where Trump is the amalgamation of power to the GOP by having a populist who will take votes from blue collar white Democrats who have been abandoned by the current Democrat party, which will result in a massive landslide victory, orIs it the beginning of a reversal in trend with the deep fracture of the GOP, between the ideological/intellectual federalist conservative/libertarian wing of the party with the lowest common denominator rhetoric republican (equivalent of the Democrat base who are not the elitists - the uneducated Democrats who vote for free stuff) which the media has painted the who the GOP is made up of.As someone who is on the ideological wing of the conservative base, I can tell you that most started off as #nevertrump, and some are slowly consolidating to supporting Trump. There is one thing that can get the rest of #nevertrump conservatives to full support - the picking of Cruz as his VP. But as of now the probability seems low and Trump perceives as not needing the conservative base to win.