Is my work on this Law Problem correct?
Keep working on it. 1. There is no fact that shows Johnson actually knows the price he paid for it six years ago. However, it may be true that that information is "susceptible" to Johnson's knowledge (he could know). Unfortunately, the plaintiff has the burden of proving he DID know at that moment. 2. There is no evidence of "blatant deceit". It could be a simple ignorance of the price paid or a simple mis-remembering, which may be negligent but unintentional. Fraud is an intentional tort. 3. There is no evidence that the intent was to deceive, thus it would be difficult to prove that Johnson intended Davis to believe him, let alone act on the incorrect information to his detriment. 4. Davis did have various options for determination of the value of the property, including third-party appraisal, official records of the Johnson purchase, personal records of Johnson's seller, etc., but he may well have "relied" upon the incorrect information as being a valid point of valuation, but also "assumed the obvious risk" that the information was incorrect when he chose not to verify it. The original purchase price of a house IS relevant for a cost-based appraisal (the purchase price, plus any improvements or appreciation, minus any damage or deterioration, etc). It is VERY common to rely upon the answer to the question, "How much did you pay for it?" as a starting point in the negotations. 5. The issue is whether the reliance upon the misrepresenation CAUSED the damages. As mentioned, there is an assumption of risk in an as-is transaction where the buyer has waived the right to a third-party appraisal and failed to require documenting proof of the various representations. There were certainly "damages" here, but not caused by fraud -- rather the buyer's own negligence.
Which is correct? Work in progress, or working progress?
work in progress sounds better, working in progress doesn't sound right.So Work in progress in my prospective sounds grammatically correct.
"he working hardly" is it correct form ?
"Hardly" is not the adverb of "hard." "Hardly" means "almost not at all," and it must go before the verb, so "he is hardly working" would mean "he is barely working at all." The word "hard" can be used as an adverb itself, but it goes after the verb ("He is working hard") and means "he is working diligently."
Which is correct? I work at x or I work for x?
Most of the answers address the question as it was asked, and some are excellent. However, more options exist. In the examples below, notice that an article (a, an, the) is added in many cases.Which is correct? I work at x or I work for x?AT — I can work at a specific location.I work at the mill.I work at a Shell gas station.FOR — I can work for a specific employer.I work for the city of Los Angeles.I work for Home Depot. (Home Depot is a common hardware store in the US.)I work for the CEO. (This means that the CEO is my boss.)I work for myself. (I own the business. I am my own boss.)IN — I can work in an environment.I work in the museum.I work in a bank.ON — I can work on an area of land.I work on a farm.I work on the reservation.Others can probably think of more prepositions.Here are some variations that go off-topic:I work at / on being the best plumber in town.I work for $45 per hour.I work for peanuts. (Meaning, I don’t get paid enough.)I work for the joy of seeing my patients smile.I work on / in an Agile software design team.I work on my grammar skills.I’ve been workin’ on the railroad, all the live-long day….
Mass of calcium chloride? Is my working correct?
Calcium source is CaCO3, has molecular weight of 100.09 g/mol. 50 g CaCO3 = 0.50 mol. 0.50 mol CaCO3 is converted to 0.50 mol CaCl2. CaCl2 has a molecular weight of 110.99 g/mol. 0.50 mol x 110.99 g/mol = 55.50 g.
Normal Distribution - is my working correct?
Your answer in A is not correct. There is no need for the "1 - " see work below. Find P( X < 6350 ) P( ( X - μ ) / σ < ( 6350 - 7002 ) / 1002 ) = P( Z < -0.6506986 ) = 0.2576205 For Part B you should check your table readings. Find P( X > 8000 ) P( ( X - μ ) / σ > ( 8000 - 7002 ) / 1002 ) = P( Z > 0.996008 ) = P( Z < -0.996008 ) = 0.1596231 An applet for finding the values: http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~naras/jsm/...
Is, “I have a work to do”, a correct sentence?
No. This is one example of why English is such a difficult language. There are “count” nouns-nouns that can be counted like desk or plant or book, and there are “non-count” nouns-nouns that represent something that can’t be counted like the hair on your head or the sand at the beach. Work, in the case of your example, is a non-count noun. Job is a count noun, so you could say, “I have a job to do,” but work, being a non-count noun would be stated, “I have work to do.” I know it is confusing, especially for a non-native English speaker, but with time, the concept might become clear to you.Taking one of the examples above, you can have “a STRAND of hair”(the word “strand” is a count noun), but you would have “hair on your head” (non-count). If you say I have “a hair on my head,” then that means that you literally have one strand of hair on your head and are essentially bald. I hope that makes sense.
Which sentence is correct, “I also work” or “I work too”?
Bit of an odd question to be honest.im thinking of the rare situation in which you would use this phrase.if you were ask someone “do they work?”if they reply “yes” you would not then usually follow up with “I also work” or “I work too” that would make you sound Russian or something no offence to Russians.you either wait for a reciprocal question in which you would then state“yes, I work as …. Or “I work as….or “yes I work for …. or “I work for …
Which sentence is correct, “I do my work” or “I does my work”? And Why?
I do my work……
Which one is the correct sentence? "It seems to be working fine", "It seems working fine", or "It seems to work fine"?
Seems must be followed with an infinitive; working is wrong here.The difference between the other two is a difference of meaning.One of the applications of the present progressive is to speak of something ongoing in the presence of the speaker and listener. Take the context of a machine that has just been repaired. If the repair is successful, the best choice for the alternatives in the question would be “It seems to be working fine (now).” It would be odd to say “”It seems to work fine” in that context.The misnamed simple present tense is used to speak of generalities and universal truths. Take the context of a new machine that has just been installed. In that context, the “simple present” would be used to express satisfaction that the machine was a good purchase: “It seems to work fine.”Now take the context of a service call where the technician fails to see a problem. The technician might appropriately say either “It seems to work fine” or “It seems to be working fine,” because the technician might choose to express either as a general truth about the machine (“simple present”) or an observation about an ongoing present reality (present progressive).