Is it possible that the protagonist and antagonist could become friends torwards the end of a story?
Your characters may do whatever you like them to do. You get to be God in your own fictional universe. Readers will go along with you if you have written a story that makes sense for that to happen. Random, arbitrary plot twists that happen just to have plot twists are annoying no matter what their outcome but an unexpected turn that a reader can look back on everything that precedes it and say "Oh, I can see that", that's a job well-done on your part.
What is the word for a bad protagonist?
That would be called an Anti-Hero.
An anime that the protagonist is a bad guy?
Code Geass if you haven't watched it the main character isn't bad he's like a little bit of Light from Death Note but he cares even if he call his group pawns or go on a killing spree but he does have that habit trying to get his best friend on his side all I got to say his friend Suzaku was an annoying ***** other than that it's pretty good I wasn't really hooked into it early but the last few episodes you will be going wtf **** just got real. Higurashi there are episodes that focus on one character in the end someone will die and they will be brought back in season 2 you will get all your answers in season 1 you are suppose to be confused there isn't a bad protagonist in this series if you like to see a good bois turn into a crazy killer then you will probably like the series. Cowboy Bebop none of that friend BS S-CRY-ed main character is usually Kazuma who loves to fight he usually says MORE POWER!
Is the protagonist the good guy or bad guy?
Protagonist- Good Guy (He is a PRO at being good) Antagonist- Bad Guy (He is AN aggravating bad guy) That's how I always remember it.
Is it possible to shoot yourself like the protagonist of Fight Club and survive?
Technically yes but realistically not likely. In scanning medical literature there are cases that seem as though they shouldn't have happened. Like Phineas Gage who had an eight foot railroad spike pass completely through his skull and was up walking soon afterward and lived. He had some issues but the survival alone has kept this story in active circulation for over a hundred years. If you look at anatomy books of the neck you can see that there isn't good place to get shot anywhere. Not that other areas are superb places to absorb supersonic lead but the neck and head are pretty loaded with necessary features. Hit the carotid... Bad day. In the movie it looked like it went right through this artery. And standing up and trying to talk after would not be an option. Even if the brain was able to compensate for blood flow loss from a really important artery or arteries his response after the wound makes no sense. Tough guys can't just ignore blood loss to the brain. It also would have to pass through the oropharangeal cavity, maybe tongue, maybe mandible, .. Suffice it to say a bunch of important stuff that likes to stay put or it bleeds in protest. Hit the spine or brain stem... yikes. That being said I bet most ER workers could tell you stories that seem supernatural in outcome. Minute changes in location could perhaps alter the damage. But really the shock wave alone seems like a hell of a thing to recover from. A solid punch to the jaw is a good choice for a knockout and while I'm no ammunition specialist I'd bet my first born that a blank alone would be pretty severe. Then add the .45 cal bullet from a 1911 and it would be pretty unlikely. I'm not positive the gun is a 1911 but I'm pretty sure. Having shot this many times I can tell you this is a big round. So "don't try this at home" shall be the phrase of the day.
If the main character of a story is the bad guy, is he the protagonist or the antogonist?
The person above is wrong. The main character, whether good or bad, is the protagonist. The definition of protagonist is the main character in a work of literary, theatrical, cinematic, or musical narrative, around whom the events of the narrative's plot revolve and with whom the audience is intended to most identify. They can be good, bad or even a rock. The antagonist is the person who opposes the main character, so the good guys, in this case, would be the antagonist.
Is it bad to make the antagonist the protagonist's father?
The best character in Assassin’s Creed III is undoubtedly Haytham Kenway. He is the antagonist to his son Connor Kenway, the protagonist. If you’ve played the game before, you were probably completely underwhelmed by the story and the character of Connor himself, but the relationship between Haytham and his son was perhaps the most interesting part of the game.The times when they worked together, the times when they worked against each other, the times where they interacted and threatened one another. These scenes were all interesting. Had Connor been a more interesting character, like his father and grandfather before him (in fact, any AC protagonist before or after him - not sure about Arno though) then this would have worked to the game’s strength.I suppose what I’m trying to say is that it isn’t bad. It can be really good, if you write it well. Just ensure that both characters are interesting in their own right, beyond their feud, and then ensure that the reason of their antagonism towards one another is believable. Allow their relationship dynamic to be believable and intriguing, so that we can understand both sides of the story. Don’t have his father be some all-out villain for the sake of it.Also, for sake of leaving cliches behind, it’s best that the protagonist, or in the very least the reader, is aware from the very beginning that the antagonist is his father. “I am your father” reveals are just too cliche and a little bit of a rip-off.