Battlefield bad company 2 VS black ops?
Black ops is the worst game ever. Don't believe all the hype. It's nothing but a run around with your head cut off shooter. Killstreak are stupid and wayyyyy overpowered. It's nothing but a waterdown console game, with flashy killstreaks, all guns act the same, and have next to no recoil. Did i mention the maps are about the size of your bathroom.... Example: Nuketown is probably the worst map ever created. You kill someone, and 4 seconds he will spawn directly behind you and kill you. 1. No tactics 2. No sense of teamwork 3. Very repetitive gameplay and basically a copy and paste port from MW and MW2. BC2. ONE WORD. Deestructable Enivornments. You want to have a thrill of being in a firefight with everything blowing up around you? How about knowing the wall your hiding behind doesnt mean you rbullet proof. 1 well placed 40mm or CG will kill you quickly. People complaining about BC2 have no idea on how to play the game. Most that just posted are Call of duty fanboys (was one back in the cod 1 and 2 days) and just run around maps way bigger than COD maps thinking they will get 40 kill streaks. 1.You need teamwork. 2. Cannot lone wolf to win maps 3. Vehicles are not overpowered. Ever heard of Engineer class? so in conclusion. You want a mindless shooter play blackops. You want a tactical shooter that requires teamwork to win and destructable enivorments play BC2.
Is there prestige in Battlefield Bad Company 2?
is there prestige in Battlefield Bad Company 2 or anything like it. i know the top level is 50, but one of my friends said u can go bronze, then go silver then gold and all of my other friends say this is a lie can u please tell which one is true
Battlefield: Bad Company 2 vs. Medal of Honor?
It's a tough choice, no doubt. Both come from the same multiplayer developer, DICE, so the games are similar. Based on what you are looking for, however, I would strongly recommend Battlefield: Bad Company 2 (BFBC2). Both are great games, without a doubt, but BFBC2 is a game where victory is simply not possible without coordinated teamwork, but still offers the baddie blasting fun of many other shooters, such as Medal of Honor. Whether you are looking to play with friends or the massive online community, you will have no trouble finding an excellen team/objective based shooter in Battlefield: Bad Company 2. Happy shooting!
Battlefield bad company 2 vs cod black ops?
Freedom of editing your character=Black ops Freedom in the battlefield= BC2 Freedom to piss about= BC2 Freedom to not get owned constantly= BC2 Freedom to have uncompetitive fun= BC2 Freedom to have personalised weapons= Black ops Freedom to have a killing spree= Black ops Freedom to get pissed off= Black ops Freedom to sit in a bush, calmly picking of long range shots with a rifle of your choice in the safe knowledge that all the enemy players are rubbish snipers= BC2 Freedom to get shouted at by angry prestige players= Black ops Freedom to get killed constantly by the level fifty guy on the other team, but not get pissed off because the lighthearted mood of the game means that if you actually met in person you wouldn't kill each other= BC2 Freedom to have a laugh while playing the **** campaign= BC2 Freedom to sit in awe of the beyond-perfect storytelling in the missions= Black ops Freedom to destroy the tank that just killed your friend and then machine gunning the people who bail out of it= BC2 Freedom to knife a door down= BC2 Freedom to have the knife instantly respond instead of having to wait for two seconds= Black ops Freedom to realise the greater realism in a delay in which your player draws his knife= BC2 Freedom to blow a wall down because you hate it= BC2 Freedom to sit back, and let everyone else do the dirty work= BC2 Freedom to not have to play a small choice of game types= Black ops Freedom to sit in a tank firing down on a cluster of buildings in a desert port town not giving a crap that a sniper just dropped some charges by your tank and is about to blow you up= BC2 Freedom to worry about your kill death ratio= Black ops Freedom to not worry about your kill death ratio, because in the end it's just a game= BC2 Overall, I'm a Bad Company man, although I can see the appeal in Black ops.
ArmA vs Battlefield vs COD. Which is more fun to play?
It really depends on what you’re looking for in a shooter. Personally, I’d say my favourite is Arma III.Arma 3 is a great game if you’re looking for a game where you have to be strategic and tactical. Arma 3 is incredibly versatile when it comes to strategies. Playing with small team against a much larger force? You can fight as guerillas, going into an enemy zone that's heavily fortified? Get some tanks, or call in some artillery. You can also call in air support, artillery strikes and so on. Arma also has the benefit of an incredibly versatile editor, that can be used for creating virtually infinite scenarios. The game has a very large mod community, so there is no shortage of new content for you to try, some adding new maps, or armies and with the right mods, the game can actually become quite a realistic game. Arma III also has units that you can join. Units are groups of players who come together to do events. I’d recommend joining one, as they add a lot more options for things to do. Arma III has a lot more depth than the other games, teamwork, strategy and tactics are all important to your team being an effective fighting force. Arma also has a very unique feature, called Zeus, which is an in-game mission maker, that allows the person controlling it to make a mission on the spot.However, Arma 3 is not with cons; it doesn't come with many pre-made single player scenarios outside of its campaign. If you’re coming from more casual shooters like Call of Duty or Battlefield, you will find it has a very steep learning curve. Combat in the game, while fun, might not feel as action packed as Battlefield or Call of Duty. The game also has a lot of controls. Like an obscene amount of controls. I’ve been playing the game for a long time and I still don't know all of the controls to the game. The game also is very demanding in terms of processing power, so the game naturally requires a powerful PC for it to be playable. This alone is reason enough to not get Arma.Overall, I’d say that Arma III is an incredibly fun game if you’re looking for a fun, challenging experience.
What are the small maps in Battlefield Bad Company 2?
Arica Harbor, White Pass and Oasis are all small.
Battlefield bad company 2 vs call of duty world at war. which game should i get?
if you buy cod5 and youll just get bored of it in a month or 2. Definitely get bc2, once you play it you will not regret it. The online is 10x more epic and fun than mw2.
Which game should i get battlefield bad company 2 or call of duty black ops?
Battelfield is better. Better maps, better wepons , better everything, unfortunatly we were dissapointed in black ops the campain was fun but multiplayer is lacking in excitment(campers are rampant) often the system has a hard time finding a game which is ridiculous because everyone pretty much is playing that game, and the maps are really small.hope that helps!
Battlefield vs Call of Duty? Pros and Cons.?
There both great games. Cod is a arcade shooter and battlefield is a realistic war experience. Black ops and bf3 are different. Black ops has zombies. Which is fun. Bf3 only has co-op. For graphics, I Pefer battlefield 3 because it uses frostbite 2.0, while black ops uses a five year old engine. Treyarch rushed on making black ops while dice take time making bf3. For sever, they both have problems. There's no games with best sever. For campang, there both pretty good. Black ops is more interesting because it's base on the cold war back then while bf3 takes place on today times or I should say (2014). Bf3 graphics on campang are way better on multiplayer and black ops. The campang to me on bf3 is a little kinda boring. The best experience was the earthquake. For multiplayer, there both fun. Black ops onlin is rushing and face pace while bf3 online is about teamwork and thinking. Cod has killstreak and battlefield 3 has only points streak I should say. Battlefield 3 has vehicles and cod doesn't. Only for killstreaks. For maps, battlefield 3 is the awnser. Bf3 has HUGE maps and black ops has small maps. Cod maps are design for close combat while bf3 maps are design for vehicles combat like for room for jets. For dlcs, both games will have 4 dlcs. Black ops dlcs are worth it. It has zombie maps and online maps. But $15 is expensive. Bf3 dlcs are really nice and better. The dlcs includes new weapons, new maps, avchevements, and vehicles. There more worth the money than black ops dlc. Bf3 4th dlc might be battlefield 2143. Let's hope. There both great. But I rather close battlefield 3!
BF: Bad Company 2 vs. COD: Modern Warfare 2?
PLEASE READ FIRST: Today, I was going to pick up COD: Modern Warfare 2 today and while I was watching some videos of it I found out the BF: Bad Company came out in 2 days (March 2) and I started to watch some of the game play and stuff and it looks good. But, is BF BC2 more serious like COD MW2? Because in the first BF BC they tried to make the game funny. Which game is more serious, has better graphics, realism, story, multiplayer, vehicles, and length of campain? Please dont just yell stuff like "MODERN WARFARE!!!" or "BF sucks..." I really need a real and helpful answer. Thanks...