It's been established that Americans want Trump to end the widespread corruption caused by the Obama Administration, so why are liberals protesting?
Your first error is claiming that there was “widespread corruption” in the first place….especially given that I can't think of a Republican administration after Eisenhower that wasn't riddled with corruption and/or scandal.Nixon - Watergate (and Spiro Agnew before that)Reagan - Iran-Contra, easily the worst scandal to date since Vietnam. And let's not forget his several instances of attempting regime change and supporting dictators like Pinochet and Marcos.Bush 41 - he was also involved hip-deep in Iran-Contra. But to give him his due, he was (as Obama directly pointed out) a much-underrated president, and was better and more courageous than most Americans realize.Bush 43 - Do you really have to ask?In contrast, look at Benghazi - NINE different federal investigations, most of which were run by the GOP-led House Benghazi Committee….and what did ALL of those investigations find? Zero wrongdoing by either Obama or Hillary. No wrongdoing at all. But what do most conservatives think? That the NINE federal investigations were all flawed, or that the government agencies are corrupt….or anything else, as long as they get to prosecute Hillary or Obama.So….how about taking a step back and having a truly objective discussion over who’s really corrupt? But one word of warning - requiring myself to be objective, to look at facts without regard for who I might like better, is what made me change from being a strong conservative in the early 1990’s to the strong liberal I am today.