Would rescinding DACA be the most unfair and gratuitously cruel act since the internment of Japanese Americans during WWII, and the product of a sick mind?
In 2012 Trump stated that he was against deporting “Dreamers”. Most Americans are accustomed to Trump’s chaos, and contradictory statements. Another example manifests as he Now feels the need to boost his standing with his supporters, as well as go against ANYTHING that Obama had initiated, by going against DACA.The answer posted on Quora by Michael F. is great, and there are so many other examples of heroes within the numbers of those approved to be here in the U.S. via DACA. I have personally met many of them.“Morally and practically, it's difficult to justify deporting the nearly-1 million people who had their DACA applications approved by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.”Perhaps some of the “Dreamers” (now part of a Nightmare)will leave the country when their other family members are deported, yet most are well established here, as home. How much would it cost to round these people up and deport them against the legality that had been bestowed upon them. Would it become a police state, a push toward underground movement, higher risk to look hispanic? Heck we have already deported (in error) over 20k U.S. citizens because they were hispanic.Who will immediately replace their jobs? (No there is not a list of qualified people ready to slip in their positions.) What will happen to real estate?? Hope you don’t own rentals, or investment in properties that will go under. Is the average Trump supporter aware of how much,many cities and states, and particularly businesses, depend on the consumer base that will be deported? Businesses will be shut down (I know that happened in Arizona after a wide spread deportation).It is beyond unfair or cruel. The solution is worse than any problem identified by immigration issues. When will we walk in wisdom?
Should I vote libertarian, or republican?
Original Question: Should I vote libertarian, or republican?No Original Question DetailsThank you for the A2A, Charles GeorgeThat is truly a tough question.And I have to be blunt. The Libertarians continue to pursue a failing strategy. You would think that people who are smart enough to figure out that the system is corrupt would be smart enough to figure out that the path to success is to hijack a party, not to try to succeed as a third party.But the dilemma is real.I do not know how any libertarian votes for the Military-Industrial-Prison Complex, but one gets that from both parties.My strategy used to be to vote for Republicans for the House of Representatives, Democrats for the Senate, and the lesser of two evils for President.But that strategy has its flaws as well.While gridlock may be my friend, gridlock is not always gridlock.Back to my original point. It absolutely boggles my mind that Libertarians cannot grasp that if they can get numbers to vote in the primary—does not matter which party, then in the general election, those votes are leveraged by a lot of people who vote based solely based upon (D) or (R) whether for or against.The Libertarians should be a PAC, not a party. And frankly they should run as Democrats where the Democrats are strong, and as Republicans whee the Republicans are strong. Once you get to Washington, what does it matter what letter is next to your name? You can vote with your party on the things that don’t offend your principles. If you are a Republican, you can vote to defend gun rights. If you are a Democrat, you can vote to defend abortion rights and against the religion-state.