TRENDING NEWS

POPULAR NEWS

Call Of Duty Ghost Or Battlefield 4

Battlefield 4 or call of duty ghost?

Personally, I love both(Do tend to play COD a little more, as it's better for quick casual 'fragging') and plan on getting both.

However, story wise it's too soon to say as more has been revealed about Ghosts than BF4. But you have to keep in mind the majority of COD and BF players do not buy for the campaign, and many do not even play it. Granted, COD has been known for having the better campaigns in most public opinion, but then again it's the multiplayer that most people buy for.

Multiplayer wise, both will be good. Of course, graphic wise Battlefield will win as they have been making major improvements all the time whereas COD is just now stepping it up. Then you have Battlefield actually having player destructible environments, while COD Ghosts will only have dynamic pre programmed destruction.


Hope that helps.

Call of Duty:Ghost or Battlefield 4?

For your Arcade Shooter, Fast Paced Games go with Call of Duty Ghosts.
If you like realism in games go with Battlefield 4.
It depends on what kind of games you like, if you like both get them both.
Let's say if you want Battlefield 4 when it comes out, then get it, then when you're bored of the game get Call of Duty Ghosts to try the game and try something new.

Battlefield 3 or Call of Duty Ghosts?

Why is this a question...Honestly if you want a new game shouldn't it be Battlefield 4 or Ghosts, and my answer is it depends on what you like because COD is focusing all there games on multiplayer now a days and Battlefield is all about the story so it all depends on what game you like and if your going to buy Battlefield 3 it is a waste of money because of the server thing they put in the game its pretty much a waste of money and if they do that again the whole game might as well be a waste of money and if you want to hear annoying 12 year olds on the multiplayer then get COD because COD is mostly fast run and gun gameplay with a lot of trash talking rather then Battlefield playing the objective and vehicles like jets and all that crap, but the next game isnt by treyarch so the multiplayer supposedly not going to make you smash your head at the wall when you die by a 6 year old german so this is a question that is going to bring a war so good luck picking im just getting both so i dont have to deal with this sh!t

Battlefield 4 vs Call of Duty: Ghost?

As a player of both, I'm going say to Battlefield 4.

Call of Duty has been getting a little repetitive, the next games only offering some new guns, kill streaks and maps, without changing how the game feels. They don't have anything that makes them really stand out, other than the amount of players. If Call of Duty: Ghosts continues this trend, I'm just going to wait until the game feel changes, whenever that may be.

As for Battlefield, what's not to like? There's a great emphasis on teamwork and helping the team instead of the individual. It rewards you more for helping out your team, whether that's reviving, PTO, resupplying, designating targets, repairing etc, and not solely on the amount of kills you get in a game. There's vehicular warfare. The guns are almost all unique in feel and proficiency. There's the map variety (BF3 as an example), you have absolutely massive maps like Armored Shield, and smaller maps for Deathmatch games. It's realistic.

Battlefield vs. Call of Duty?

Battlefield. CoD has become a sellout. CoD4 was pretty simple and the perks and killstreaks weren't overwhelming they just added a little variety to your character. But now it's ridiculous with too many guns, pointless killstreaks, and overpowered perks. It's turned into an arcade game, not a reality based fps. Battlefield has huge maps and strongly encourage teamwork rather than running around like a tard. Also, the vehicles add a nice touch and the perks are very nonintrusive. Best part about Battlefield though: NO KILLSTREAKS. For people wanting a far more realistic modern war shooter, Battlefield is superior One last bit, I love the huge maps but Call of Duty makes their maps smaller and smaller with each edition

Which is better: Battlefield 3 or Call of Duty MW3?

Graphics are of the same level. Having played all of CODs starting from 4, quite surprised with BF3, (while BF2 was shit) it is much closer to reality. The controls are less straightforward and there are some gliches but givenĀ  BF3 more complicated terrain and destruction possibility, I can close eyes on that. CODMW3 remains cool for sure, but it is more like paintball on the screen, or a squash, while BF3 is a as real as it can get and it is a tennis...

TRENDING NEWS