Compare and contrast the creation of man in Genesis and metamorphosis.?
This is clearly a school assignment. You should be writing it yourself in your own words. Asking for people to do your class work on here is cheating.
Whether you believe in creationism or evolution or something in between, there is without a doubt, an origin of man and awareness. It has an exact time and place in history. That event is impressive and marvelous to the greatest degree of our comprehension. The story of that awareness is the oldest story ever told. It is the first event of conscious history. The event and consequent story is not a myth.The story has circled the globe from that time forward. It has become isolated at times. It has traveled on the fastest routes. It has moved through every culture, language and society. It has been recorded on every medium.It appears to be similar because it is the same story, having arrived at the point of written record through a different path.
Ovids Creation Story?
Hi, I guess you could say that Hesiod's is more 'honest', in a way, because Hesiod was a very pious man and in his Theogony he's trying to tell about the gods as accurately as he can. Ovid, on the other hand, has no interest in this. His cosmogony is just an introduction to his poem, and as such it has no real religious meaning. In Ovid's cosmogony you can distinguish two things: a) the idea that 'someone' can re-arrange the world as he sees fit - a very Roman notion, and utterly unGreek. Romans had been rearranging nature for a while by the time Ovid was born, and from his point of view someone was needed to cut through the forests, bring water with huge aqueducts, build roads and so on. Another thing about this architect idea is that b) it suggests a simile with what ovid is doing in tackling a mess o mythology stories and only selecting and rearranging the ones he wants to tell (specifically, the ones concerning Amor, of course). So I think you should look at it this way. If you need references, there are a lot of good books and articles about both authors - I'm sure the University librarian can help you out. :)
Genesis help!! genesis 22.1-12 anyway lol ?
the 1st Biblical connection with a rainbow is interior the account of the covenant God made with Noah and his offspring after the Flood survivors got here out of the ark. (Ge 9:8-17; Isa fifty 4:9, 10) This the perfect option sight of itself could have been reassuring and a demonstration of peace to Noah and his family individuals. Many comments have been presented as to no count if this became the 1st time people observed a rainbow. some commentators have held that rainbows have been seen in the previous and that God’s ‘giving’ the rainbow as we communicate became relatively a ‘giving’ of specific meaning or importance to a earlier present phenomenon. lots of those preserving this view have faith that the Flood became purely community or did no longer drastically exchange the ambience. although, it is the 1st point out of a rainbow, and if a rainbow have been seen till now, there could have been no actual tension in God’s making it a marvelous sign of his covenant. it could have been regular, and not an substantial marker of a metamorphosis, of something new. The Bible would not describe the degree of readability of the ambience purely earlier than the Flood. yet apparently atmospheric circumstances have been such that, till a metamorphosis got here approximately while “the floodgates of the heavens have been opened” (Ge 7:11), no others in the previous Noah and his family individuals had seen a rainbow. Even in the present day, atmospheric circumstances impression no count if a rainbow could be seen or no longer. the attention, attractiveness, and peacefulness of a rainbow that seems after a typhoon are drawn upon in Biblical descriptions of God and his throne. In Ezekiel’s creative and prescient of God, the prophet observed “something like the visual charm of the bow that happens in a cloud mass on the day of a pouring rain.” This emphasised “the attention of Jehovah.” (Eze a million:28) in addition, John observed Jehovah’s throne of majesty, and ‘around approximately it there became a rainbow like an emerald in visual charm.’ The restful emerald-eco-friendly coloration of the rainbow could have pronounced composure and serenity to John, and wisely so considering the fact that Jehovah is the grasp of each and every difficulty, a marvelous Ruler. (Re 4:3) John additionally observed an angel with ‘a rainbow upon his head’ (Re 10:a million), which will advise that he became a undeniable representative of “the God of peace.”—own homestead page 4:9.
Upanishads vs VedasUpanishads and Vedas are two terms that are often confused as one and the same thing. Actually they are two different subjects for that matter. In fact Upanishads are parts of Vedas.Rig, Yajur, Sama and Atharva are the four Vedas. A Veda is divided into four parts, namely, Samhita, Brahmana, Aranyaka and Upanishad. It can be seen from the division that Upanishad forms the last part of a given Veda. Since Upanishad forms the end part of a Veda it is also called as Vedanta. The word ‘anta’ in Sanskrit means ‘end’. Hence the word ‘Vedanta’ means ‘the end portion of a Veda’.The subject matter or the content of the Upanishad is normally philosophical in nature. It speaks about the nature of the Atman, the greatness of the Brahman or the Supreme Soul and also about the life after death. Hence Upanishad is called as the Jnana Kanda of the Veda. Jnana means knowledge. Upanishad speaks about the supreme or the highest knowledge.The other three parts of the Veda, namely, Samhita, Brahmana and the Aranyaka are called together as Karma Kanda. Karma in Sanskrit means ‘action’ or ‘rituals’. It can be understood that the three parts of the Veda deal with the ritualistic part of life such as the conduct of a sacrifice, austerity and the like.Veda thus contains in it both the ritualistic and the philosophical aspects of life. It deals with the actions to be performed in life and also with the spiritual thoughts that man should cultivate in his mind to read God.Upanishads are many in number but only 12 of them are considered principal Upanishads. It is interesting to note that Adi Sankara, the founder of Advaita system of philosophy has commented on all the 12 principal Upanishads. The other major teachers of various sects of philosophical thoughts have quoted a lot from the texts of the Upanishads.
What is the Muslim position on Evolution and Creation?
The criticisms of the Jews in the Quran resulted in the persecution of Jews in Muslim lands--often slavery, deportation, land expropriation, and massacres, resulting from the permanent, uniquely Islamic institutions of jihad and dhimmitude. They had to wear on their clothes the image of an ape. Specifically, the 9th century Tunisian Qadi, Ahmed b. Talib compelled the dhimmi Jews to wear upon their shoulder a patch of white cloth (riqa') that bore the image of an ape, [the Christians were required to wear the image of a pig], and to nail onto their doors a board bearing the sign of a monkey. Apes are mentioned in Judaic texts, but zoomorphic signs were never imposed in the Jewish kingdoms, as was done for Jews and Christians in Islamic lands. Hence the actual implementation of such discriminatory zoomorphic badges is particular to Islam, and the reasons for this must be examined independently, and honestly, without any reference to Judaism. Jihadists today invoke the Quran to justify the worst terrorist crimes. Throat slitting of infidels is mentioned in the Quran. Al-Mawardi (d. 1058), the prominent 11th century jurist quoted this verse, specifically, « When you encounter those who deny (the Truth) then strike (their) necks. » (Quran 47 :4), in his learned discussion of jihad. This ritual execution is also mentioned in other Muslim legal texts and in narratives of Christian and prominent Muslim historians. Today it is performed against infidels and recorded on videotape for the edification of Muslim audiences. When the average pious Muslim reads a verse like 2:132 (“And this was the legacy that Abraham left to his sons, and so did Jacob; ‘Oh my sons! Allah hath chosen the Faith for you; then die not except in the Faith of Islam’”) or 3:67 (“Abraham was not a Jew nor yet a Christian; but he was true in Faith, and bowed his will to Allah’ (which is Islam), and he joined not gods with Allah”), he understands what so many imams tell him: that the true Jews and Christians of today are the Muslims, and the people who go by those names are renegades and rebels against God. This is of course nonsense.
they are one of the most suited opponents in one piece... their abilities were quite useless on each other.. what they needed to succeed in a fight against each other was a strong will.while Enel represents pride, Luffy represented humility.In Enel was so much strength but Luffy was made to look weak in contrast both in their character and physical strength. Enel's style of leadership was authocratic, while Luffy's was more democratic.. they were both leaders.