Complete the sentences to explain your reasoning.?
1.A buffer cannot contain (blank) such as K C l or N a C l ., such as KCl or NaCl. 2. A buffer may have a (blank), such as HC2H3O2 , and a salt containing its (blank) such as NaC2H3O2 . 3. A buffer cannot contain only a (blank) , such as NaOH, and a (blank) , such as NaCl . Using the following words: neutral salt strong acid conjugate acid weak base conjugate base strong base weak acid
Yes. See how easy that was?It depends, however, on how you define a sentence. I prefer: a statement that expresses a complete thought. The reason the single word yes can express a complete thought is that it is always a response, and there is an implied subject and verb that reflect the question the yes responds to. So my yes above is simply a short form for:Yes, it is.This is a common structure in a question and response pair. The question normally includes an interrogative adverb plus a subject and verb. The response is a matching adverb, like yes, or an equivalent adjective, like sure, without the subject and verb since it supplied implicitly by the question.Really, is that all there is to it?Yes, really.
Matrix Reasoning is a type of visual-spatial problem solving that is often used to determine intelligence. It usually involves a series of figures in which there is a pattern, with one figure in the series left blank. The problem is solved by determining, from an array of possibilities, what figure would complete the series or pattern. An example of this
A test of reasoning capability is not something you can generally study or prepare for. I have taken tests in reasoning and the answers appear to be self-evident; however, others taking the test said there were no correct answers. Attempt to think how reasonable person would respond to the question. This is very much related to emotional quotient. Here is an example of a question on reasoning I had to take many years ago, I still remember the question and the possible answers: It is your first day on a job as an accountant. Your supervisor was the last incumbent in the position. You notice what appears to be a discrepancy in the books. What do you do? 1. Contact the CEO of the organization with the alleged discrepancy. 2. Call the FBI. 3. Ask your supervisor. 4. Call the internal auditor. Take the question apart and see what is being asked. 1.It is your first day on the job (you may not know enough to decide what is correct). 2. Your boss was the last person in that job (would it be a good idea to question your boss’s integrity/competence to others?). Look over the four possible answers and see if you can ascertain what the correct course of action would be.
Geometry Question! Please help!?
In step 2: The reason is the Definition of a Linear Pair. Therefore, the statement must be something related to a linear pair. The only linear pair in this example is <1 and <4. So the statement could be that since <1 and <4 share a common side and the other sides are opposite rays, they are a linear pair. In step 5: In a college course, you would use the Sacherri-Legendre Theorem to prove this step. That is shown here: http://www.math.uncc.edu/~droyster/math3181/notes/hyprgeom/node38.html However, depending on the level, you could say that it is the definition of a triangle. In step 6: Since you showed in step 4 that m<1 + m<4 = 180 and you showed in step 5 that m<2 + m<3 + m<4 = 180, you can set the two equal. So the reason could be the above steps three and four. In step 7: The reason given is the Subtraction Property of Equality. This means that if you subtract the same thing from both sides of an equality, it will remain equal. Here, we have m<1 + m<4 = m<2 + m<3 + m<4 we can subtract m<4 from both sides, leaving m<1 = m<2 + m<3 Which was the answer to be proved. Q.E.D. If you have any questions about any of this, please ask!
What was the reasoning behind the mass murder of the Jews in the Holocaust?
Unfortunately the Anti-Semitism that was shown throughout Hitler's regime was nothing new in History, Jews have been persecuted in most countries for thousands of years, in 1096 C.E 1/3 of the population of Jews mere massacred in Northern France and Germany, in 1218 C.E Jews were forced to wear badges in England (sound familiar?), Jews have been burned alive and expelled from various countries over the years such as Austria, Poland, Russia, Portugal, Italy, France....(the list goes on) But why are they persecuted? Well I suppose it originates from Christians blaming Jews for the execution of Jesus Christ, and the tradition of blaming Jews has continued throughout History, from being blamed to spreading the Black Death to controlling the World banking system. Why then did Hitler despise Jews? Well obviously he was just carrying on the thousands of years of Anti-Semitism, but the underlining reason was that they were blamed for sabotaging the first WW1, in Germany there was a 'stab in the back' myth which blamed unpatriotic groups such as the socialists and the Jews for the failure of the first WW1, as in Germany people thought that they were winning the war right up to till the end due to Propaganda. So there national disbelief when they lost the war, and this catalysed the feeling that the army had not lost the war, it was the fault of Jews and socialists undermining the German gvmt. Thus 'Stab in the back' shows that many Germans felt they were betrayed by the Jews and add this to years of persecution of the Jews, it was nothing new to persecute them
The difference between the simple past and present perfect is what you really ask about. The simple past is neutral a way just make a statement about what happened in the past, without any personal emotion, and there is a wall between past and now, it has no connection with now situation. But the present perfect, in most case clarify a thing happened in the past cause some influence to you now, for example, “I completed the work “means I complete the work at some point of time in the past, and how about now? I have no idea , I just state a truth occurred in the past,but if I say “I had completed the work”, there does have another meaning except just state I finished the work, people usually put this sentence in this situation, such as when one people ask Tom to hang out, but he was not up for it, so he decided to refuse, so he can say, “I'm sorry, I had just completed the work, I'm so tired”, in this case, he emphase that he is tired because he just finished work and even has no time to relax, so he won't hang out, the present perfect always be used to describe what happened in the past lead to some effect to now, and the speaker wanna use it as s reason for the next sentence. That's all, hope it will be helpful.
Thanks for the A2AThe fact that you have a good hold of atleast one branch of English usage is a strength. As for what you said, it’s not all about memorizing lists and reading newspapers. You just need to know some of the common words that are used in native English speaking nations and since you (like me) are a non-native speaker, you’re finding it difficult. But keep in mind that some of these words are going to pervade your regular vocabulary and feature in your regular usage, so even if you do have to memorize it, don’t feel that it is not going to be useful. As kids, we all memorized the alphabets and the simple words from the alphabets.Secondly, reading newspapers or for that matter anything with dense verbal content, you’re increasing your skills of comprehension, which is so necessary in the actual exam (also to reiterate my point, some of the difficult words will also be used in the passages). My personal opinion is that mastering reading comprehension is a sure way of getting a great score in the test, since even the text completion and sentence equivalence questions you solve would necessitate comprehending them (and they are quite dense with respect to content). So reading stuff that enhances your knowledge, uses good vocabulary and is of a varied nature when it comes to subject content is always helpful for the test, and a good newspaper is something that fits the billing perfectly.As for the preparation, if you want to do it unconventionally, I’d suggest you read books that have good content in them and uses above average vocabulary and try to absorb the gist of the text. Search for word meanings when you come across them, try to use them, so that you’ll know how to use words in context. Make a list of such words and make sentences to use them in. If you can’t read books, search for articles in a variety of subjects and do the same with it. The more topics you’re comfortable with, the better chances you have of scoring well. This is more time consuming than the conventional process and needs a lot of dedication and efforts and I assure you that it’d be worth it.
Proof question please help!?
Triangles QRP and SRT are congruent by Angle-Side-Angle theorem. Therefore, PR is congruent to SR by CPCTC (Corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent)
Q: Why is "hence the reason" grammatically correct?A: Hence is an adverb that has two meanings.From now (used after a period of time), as in henceforth; it doesn't apply to your context.As a consequence; for this reason. This meaning applies in your case.The phrase "hence the reason" might appear redundant or superfluous, but it is not as the examples below show.China and India are buying more cars, hence the rise in pollution generated by automobile emissions in these countries.China and India are buying more cars, hence the reason for the rise in pollution generated by automobile emissions in these countries.Interest rates are expected to rise, hence the reason for locking in mortgage rates makes sense for most people.Interest rates are expected to rise; hence, locking in mortgage rates makes sense for most people.Writing is often a means of release for me, hence the reason for this blog.Writing is often a means of release for me; hence, this blog.Writing is often a means of release for me; hence this blog.