If you could say one thing to President Obama, what would it be?
Dear Mr. President,I am honored to have the privilege to write to you.Over the last four years, you certainly have changed things. Although I do not agree with many of these changes, I do know that many will miss you when you are gone from the White House, and possibly a small part of me will too.Let's start with the positives- you are one of the most charasmatic presidents we have ever had in the White House. Your charm will surely be missed. In addition, you are a great orator and communicator, and a gifted speechgiver. I can't imagine Trump or Hillary wowing the crowd and delivering one-liners like you. Although I did not support you in the 2012 Presidential Election, you roasted Mitt Romney several times during the debates. Maybe you have a career as a roastmaster after you exit the White House… who knows?Unfortunately, the policies and way of thinking you brought to the table over the last eight years were not something I could agree with you on. The Affordable Health Care Act (Obamacare) was a disaster. The site worked terribly, and some promised parts were not executed. In addition, the withdrawal of troops from the Middle East led to the rise of terrorist groups like ISIS, and the defunding of the military has made us weak. Countries like Russia no longer see us as a challenge, as we don't act on our threats under our leadership. Americans don't feel safe anymore. We can't have that. There are, of course, many other things I disagree with you on, but those are some big ones.In summation, I did not particularly favor you as a president. But you are still my president, and I still respect you. The position you have to fill is incredibly difficult, and I understand your stance on certain issues may be different than mine. Regardless of politics, thank you for leading the free world through a decade of political, economic, and social turmoil.Sincerely,Jason Strautch
Russian MUSLIMS. Why did Obama tell Putin "I'll have more flexibility after the election"?
Do you think Putin put 0bama and the Tsarnaev brothers in contact with one another ?
Is Vladimir Putin an Illuminati and follows their plan to subjugate the world?
A2AImpossible!!No, no, no. Putin and Obama members in one club? Are you nuts?! Never in life, it’s like matter and anti-matter, assured mutual annihilation. And that will be the last Bang in the Universe. Mother Nature would be forced to invent some completely different mode of reproduction.For the in-depth presentation of the above, pls see (John Brown: Obama's Illuminati 'Problem')Illustration by xnideax[I]n his weekly column, rapper John Brown—the self-proclaimed "King Of Da Burbz"—will be offering his insight into politics and current events to the Complex readers. Check out "Politickin With John Brown" every Thursday.Although Obama received enormous support as a candidate, there have always been skeptics from all political sides who question who he truly represents. Now that he's officially running shit, there's been growing chatter that he is in fact a member of the infamous "Illuminati."What exactly is this murky secret society, casually mentioned by baked college students, self-educated street sages and Ted Kaczynski sympathizers? In brief, this behind-the-scenes clique is apparently filled with government and corporate puppet-masters, intent on manipulating elections and controlling the media as a way to enact the "New World Order". Sounds pretty lame, right? Well I tried to ignore the choir of criticism, but it keeps reappearing in public dialogue. So it's only fair to review some of these more high-profile accusations against the Pres...Thanks for asking, Vim Mak.
What short letter would you like to write to Obama?
Dear Mr. President,I count myself fortunate to have had you as president and to have you always as a fellow countryman.As a card-carrying member of the first of the postwar generation (‘46), who opposed Vietnam, but served anyway (not in Vietnam), while Trump did five college draft exemptions, finally winning a 4F and a way of out of harms way, I left the USA after Reagan built a cheap-shot political campaign targeting politically active young people like me, a campaign aimed at decapitating the thinking end of my generation. He split the Boomer generation and opened the doors to the halls of congress for the B team, who agreed to be nice boys, mea culpa, and to profile themselves for dress on the standard Sunday-school teacher poster-child. They went servile as good sons and sons-in-laws and never were asked to explain how they had avoided Vietnam or military service of any kind. In earlier periods where conscription was the law, draft dodgers were often shunned by society and were marked for life in the job market.When you were elected, I thought my generation had passed into that good night of history and that our martyred soul as a cohort could safely fade into eternity and silence without setting off a civil war among us. But, instead of taking the mandate for moving on that your election represented with a clear minority of USAmerican voters at the ballot box, a small number of fanatical obstructionists of my age elected to grant themselves the power, a last stand, to be better judges of history than the electorate which voted its conscience for the promise of hope and intelligence the you personify.Now —pray us silly with blossoms of burping bombast—we have invited a twisted Richard III to roll about on our much struggled over pubic stage like a goofball Boy-nasty with red, white and blue sequins flaking off so pole-dance “presidential”, and give us every reason you can possibly dream up to immortalize this moment of infamy as superbly forgettable a tick in the tick-tock clock of Time.Everything goes down in history, but this time just how far down is anybody’s guess. We could not have dreamed how hard an act you would be to follow, but the first women president for the USA would have been so very positive to see as an encore. How could eight years, even eight years of B-team imposed political suspended animation, have gone so quickly. Thank you.
Was the Warmbier family correct in publicly rebuking Trump’s praise of Kim Jong-un?
They certainly were, and more power to the family. In a society as repressive as North Korea, nothing happens without Kim’s knowing about it. Strange that an epic liar like Trump can’t recognize another lie when he hears it.I’m so used to Trump’s bloviating that normally it’s only a mild irritant, like my allergy to dishwashing detergent. But if Trump were capable of making me sick to my stomach, his “I loved Otto” would do it.First, Trump doesn’t love anyone but himself; IMO, he wouldn’t take a bullet even for Ivanka, who is clearly his favorite child. Second, how could he have “loved” Otto Warmbier? He probably never even heard of Otto before he became president, unless Barack Obama happened to mention the Warmbier case when he was trying to brief Trump on the matters awaiting him as president.And when Otto was returned to the United States deaf, blind, mutilated and in a coma, anyone who truly loved him would have demanded to know what happened to him in North Korea. He would not have meekly said that he was taking the word of a mass murderer like Kim. I can understand why Trump kowtows to Vladimir Putin, but Kim? What in the world does Kim have on Trump?
So Trump's team had "repeated contacts" with Russian intelligence during the presidential campaign. What will happen now?
Most likely nothing — except that this will be one more bit of infamy for which the Trump administration is known by history.Look: One of the biggest problems with Trump as a public leader (in my humble opinion) is his extreme isolationism, so I actually don’t mind that he and Putin like each other. Of course their hacking of our election deserved worse sanctions than it got, but there is wisdom in the advise to “Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.” And that’s why I don’t think anything bad will — or, indeed, should — come of this for Trump, so long as he enacts a firm America-first policy with regard to Russia, and lets us clearly see him doing it.All right: On the one hand I said this was a bit of infamy, and on the other, I just said it was OK. There’s no contradiction if you read what I just said carefully: I think that so long as Trump makes it clear to his Russian pals that just because they got him elected (along with FBI Director James Commie, of course) does NOT mean Russia’s suddenly gonna become our best buddy as a nation, Trump will be doing absolutely the right thing by us, and we shouldn’t then continue to hold those pre-election Russian contacts against him, but only once he’s proven his loyalty to US over them. As a private citizen, Trump is free to like any Russian more than any other American. But as OUR leader, he has to prioritize US.Bottom Line:SO LONG AS TRUMP DOES THAT, HISTORY WON’T MIND THAT HE HAD CLOSE CONTACT WITH RUSSIA BEFORE THE ELECTION.
What did Donald Trump do wrong at the Helsinki summit? Why is there so much backlash?
The fact that he spoke was meat enough for the left and in my opinion he shouldn’t walk any of it back!I think he was being truthful when he questioned our intelligence agencies and I think he is now placating under the pressure.If you believe that he should have backed our data then you are likely a naïve idiot. These are the same agencies that insisted there were WMD’s in Iraq, were responsible for fast and furious, lied to all of us about Benghazi, used the IRS to target Republicans, turned Hillary’s crimes into just a “matter”, bugged Trump Tower and his campaign, did no investigation of the hacked DNC server and now is spending 18months on a collusion charge that has yielded nothing.If Hillary’s foundation can be funneled 400million dollars through Russian interests and Obama can be caught on a hot mic promising the Russians “flexibility” once he gets re-elected then I have to question the hypocrisy. Why are those actions not bordering treason while Trump’s soft language toward the country is? Is it because he questioned our agencies? That is all Obama did when he got elected was go on a huge apology tour for our actions toward every country he visited and the oversteps our agencies took toward others.Put your f’n torch down and go home! You are all horribly wrong to criticize…
Why does Donald Trump get away with blatantly racist and bigoted behavior that would have gotten others impeached?
It’s pretty simple really: The Democrats also say stupid things - and that’s keeping him in office.Think Democrats can’t say stupid things? Michelle Obama just said yesterday that men were being raised “entitled” and “self righteous.” Further, she placed the fault primarily on the Mothers!Amazing…This not only offended almost all of the men (nearly 50% of the voters) it also offended at least a third of the women. That’s nearly two thirds of the people who vote that were offended!Nobody wins an election by insulting the people who are voting!Like Hillary Clinton found out the hard way when she said those now infamous three words “Basket of Deplorables,” these are the type of statements that put Trump in office - and keep him there.It’s time for the Democrats to change leadership. We’ve heard the people of the past 8 years talk, and we’ve seen the results. The Democrats have lost every branch of government. It’s time the Obamas and Clintons (and Pelosi and Warren) shut up and let a new batch of people take over.People who still must win elections will be more careful what they say...—Michael LevyI’m the founder of 4Conservative.com | The Conservative Search Engine, one of over 2000 4Search.com search engines that let you search accurately by topic and interests, without tracking.
Why are Liberals so obsessed with Russia?
There’s a scene in Men In Black, where K had just shot the head off of Jeebs, twice, and it grew back, then he and J walked outside and saw some aliens. J stood there with a blank stare, and K asked, “Trying to get a handle on the moment?”This is the Democrats after the 2016 election, when their heir apparent lost the election to the guy they felt was most beatable. Ever since, ‘the Russians’ seem to be their go-to to explain why Clinton lost. They cannot accept that she lost it all on her own, despite even her own party finding she was ‘dishonest’ and ‘untrustworthy’ to the tune of 65% when they nominated her. Crash: Hillary's Untrustworthy and Unfavorable Ratings Are Worse Than EverBecause one of their top guys was so gullible as to fall for a phishing scheme, and open access to their email servers, they were hacked. Evidence showed that the actors also tried to hack some GOP servers, but were unsuccessful. FBI's Comey: Republicans also hacked by RussiaSo in their typical two-faced maneuvers, the Russians suddenly because villains. Never mind Barry O was sending messages to Vlad that he would “have more flexibility after the election”, (Barack Obama microphone gaffe: 'I'll have more flexibility after election') and Hillary herself going on a mission with a big Staples Easy button, which actually said they were going to ‘overcharge’ the Russians.So, the Russians are just something tangible they hope to hang their loss in, and they’re sticking to that story. “She was a crappy candidate and a crook” just isn’t palatable to them