Do i need a court order to file child support?
yes u do i would call your local child support office and see whats going on dont give up
What does the grandparent's property law in India state? Does the grandson own the right to the property?
The question is missing some specifics so I'll give a general answer.By your question it seems you referring to concepts of HUF and ancestral properties, so the answer is based in Hindu succession act. There may be some differences in some states and/or different religion's.The concept of right to grandfather's property is a misinformed one and there is no such right automatically except in certain cases.All property's owned by a Hindu person devolves onto his class one legal heir's. Now to the specific scenario's in ur example (for sake of convenience I'm presuming ur ur grandfather has only one legal heir)Senario1: The property is self acquired by your Grandfather, in such case upon his demise interstate (without a will) the property would devolve upon ur Father and not you. In case your farther passes away before your grandfather then it such case it would be devolve upon you, your mother and ur siblings equally.Scenario 2: the property in question is self acquired by ur grandfather father ( ur great grand farther) - would devolve same as scenario 1.Scenario 3: the property in question is self acquired by ur grandfather grand father ( ur great great grand farther) - would devolve same as scenario 1.Scenario 4: the property in question is self acquired by ur grandfathers great grand father ( ur great great great grand farther) - then in such a case you would be entitled to the property by birth as it becomes ur ancestral property.To give you more clarity on the concept of Ancestral Property's : any property which passes undivided down 4 generations of male lineage is called ancestral property. The right to such property acures at birth unlike other laws of inheritance where right arises upon the death of the the owner.Hope this brings some clarity to your question and your sense of entitlements.
Interstate Paternity Testing?
I moved to Wisconsin from Iowa and my ex in Iowa possibly had my son. Before I start paying child support, I would like a paternity test and I was wondering if anyone knew of a way for me to be tested here in Wisconsin and her(our) son to be tested in Iowa without having to both go to one location..? Thanks
Do fathers have the same parental rights as mothers?
The idea that mothers get custody over fathers is really based on the model that 90% of split families (parents don't live together because of divorce or unmarried parents living apart) are households with mothers having primary custody of the children. But that 90% are cases where custody was undisputed. When parents break up, the father usually doesn't want to be saddled with the kids full-time. They may want to have the kids with them some of the time, but it's rare when they want primary custody.In the cases where custody is disputed by mother and father, however, fathers win full custody about 70% of the time. So it isn't true that fathers are less likely to gain custody of children. It's only true that about 90% of the time, mothers end up with the kids because custody is undisputed, or the fathers aren't even around. When custody is disputed, though, fathers get it more than two-thirds of the time.
If not married with 18 month old living in Louisiana but father of child lives in Mississippi where do I file?
Wait a minute. "He works off shore." Like, on an oil rig? Now how in the world can a guy working on an oil rig take care of a baby? Sounds fishy to me, like in reality the grandparents just want to take the baby away from its mother so they can have it. I have a better idea how you can use your money productively: get your son a vasectomy.
What's the dumbest thing you've heard a defendant say in the courtroom?
In Washington State there is no excuse for speeding in a school zone unless you are a police officer or an ambulance.In other words, the court can’t be lenient—even if you say you were on the way to a hospital with a pregnant wife, or someone was bleeding to death in your car. You simply must pay the fine. The judge has no discretion.I went to court because they had a picture of the back of my van going through a school zone doing 28. The speed limit was 20.The judge divided the room into two groups: People who were claiming they weren’t driving, and people who were driving but had an excuse.The judge gave his speech about how he couldn’t be lenient and if you were driving you *had* to pay the fine. No excuses or exceptions. He told the group that was driving but had an excuse they should simply leave and pay the court clerk, but they had a right to be heard so they could stay and ‘fight it’ if they wanted.I heard every excuse in the book. And boy….were they stupid.Someone claimed they were only doing 5 over and that wasn’t fast enough to ‘count’. Guilty.Someone pretended to be a physics professor. Guilty.One claimed the state had no authority. Guilty.A man said the sun blocked his visibility of the sign. Guilty.A woman said she was going to the hospital for an emergency. Guilty.One woman said she had recently had neck surgery and couldn’t turn her head to look at the sign. Guilty. She was ordered to pay the fine and the judge told her she should consider not driving until the injury was healed.A man said he couldn’t see the sign. The city attorney showed evidence the sign was clearly visible and had flashing lights. Guilty.Someone claimed the sign was improperly displayed. Guilty.Someone claimed they had the right to face their accuser and that he didn’t see the traffic camera/radar detector in the courtroom. Guilty.Then those who weren’t driving were called up.The lady before me swore she wasn’t driving. She had been at a party and most of the cars were blocked in. A friend named Bob (whom she hadn’t seen in 15 years) needed to ‘go for smokes’ and borrowed her car. The judge asked for Bob’s last name and her reply was that *he* had gotten remarried and she didn’t know his last name. …wait a sec…? What did she just say? Ticket dismissed. Wait…what did the judge just say?
Illinois child support?
Why is it that when a woman asks a question about child support men reply back as if it were them i'm after?I recently asked a question about my child support order for my daughter and got 2 not so nice answers.Both of which were from men.I was told to get a better job and take care of my own.Well,I alone have supported her since the day she was born, and he refused to help on his own at all,but he took care of kids that aren't his and he's not with the mother.i have 2 kids, and I have never had any help with them.Not once in 5 years.To me it's not fair because women are left with the burden alone.I take care of them in every way possible while he gets to live free however he wants.He has no penalties.I have a support order for both kids,but that doesn't mean I get any of it.I don't. It is really hard being a single parent,and doing everything alone.I didn't get pregnant all on my own.i was told to forget the support issue and let them have a relationship.I did.He doesn't see her at al
Is it possible to have 50/50 custody across state lines?
DON'T marry your child's father as it will give him rights that he doesn't have as an unmarried father. As it is, if your child's alleged father has not signed papers asserting his paternity or has a court order declaring him to be the father (ie. through a court-ordered dna paternity test), he is not the legal father of your child. Don't let him have access to the child until your sole custody has been confirmed AND the court has ordered visitation and set up child support. Otherwise, he may take off with your child (remember, he isn't the legal father yet) and go for custody himself. Now will he get 50/50 custody...highly unlikely since you two were not married and unless you are stupid enough to go to court without a lawyer (NEVER EVER DO THAT), he shouldn't be awarded any kind of visitation either as he will be in another state and that will be harmful to the baby (baby needs to bond with his breast-feeding mom). Get yourself a good lawyer and go to court seeking to have your sole custody confirmed. Let your ex go to court himself if he wants to have his paternity confirmed....or if you are on any kind of public benefits, the government will track him down (but not at your expense). One last thing...his lawyer is probably going to try to get you to give up some of your rights under the guise of "fairness"...such as the right to move as you please without your ex's approval/consent. When it comes to "fairness" ask yourself...what part of the pregnancy/childbirth did your ex experience? None? Do what is in YOUR best interest and in the best interest of your child...and don't give your ex a thing that the court does not order. And as I said above, always go to court WITH A LAWYER...the best you can afford. Good luck and God bless. ***** Addendum: Unless you are a crack-addicted prostitute (no offense intended), no court is going to send a 3 month baby to live with his alleged father for six months of the year...that is meant for much older children. And once the alleged father has had his six months, he is apt to go to court to keep the child permanently as that change-over is very unhealthy for babies...not that he will admit that before he has his six months!