Does anyone believe former Obama, Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper's statement that spies were placed in the Trump campaign to protect Donald Trump?
Does anyone believe former Obama Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper's statement that spies were placed in the Trump campaign to protect Donald Trump?Absolutely not!Barrack Obama used various government agencies against his political opponents throughout his campaign. Not just the Justice Department and FBI, as was done here, but the IRS, ATF, EPA, and more.Liberals don't seem to see it, or don't care, but this is the greatest threat to the Constitution and American freedom since the country was founded. The US should not be acting like a third world banana republic.If Obama and the FBI were really concerned about Russian interference, which is obviously not true, they could have contacted the Trump campaign instead of placing a spy and wire tapping campaign staff.The truth, whis out there if you honestly look is that with the knowledge and permission of the Obama administration the FBI and DOJ conducted intelligence and surveillance on the administration's political opponents during and after a Presidential campaign. They lied to FISA courts to obtain warrants. Rod Rosenstein, who should have recussed himself, instead appointed, possibly illegally, a Special Counsel who also had conflicts of interest. He then later secretly expanded Meuller's scope, refusing initially to inform the Courts or Congress a copy of the new scope.This type of corruption is not new. In spite of promises to the contrary, the Obama administration bent over backwards to keep it's activities secret. They refused to provide documents to Congress, who is Constitutionally charged with oversight. The spied on American journalists, violating the spirit, if not the words of the First Amendment.The Obama legacy will be to go down as the most corrupt in American history. Richard Nixon was a saint in comparison.
Why is the Media taken over by liberals?
I love these questions about the “liberal media.”It may have applied forty years ago, when we had three news channels.Today, we can no longer define “media,” much less ascribe a bias to it.Fox News has the highest ratings of any news outlet.We have dozens of major newspapers and news magazines, including The Wall Street Journal & The Economist, perhaps centrist at best.The most listened to radio stations and podcasts are hyper conservative, including Rush Limbaugh, Laura Ingraham, Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity. This list goes on, with 75 million weekly listeners.Then we have conservative forces on Face Book, Twitter and other social media influences, controlled by individuals with few editorial filters.There are roughly one billion websites out there.Then we have the lost world of books.In truth, no one ideology controls the media anymore. People control the media. You can find plenty of highly rated media outlets in any domain to validate your conservative biases. Take your pick. The idea one huge liberal mind presides over it? That one is downright silly.
How do liberals feel about the four-page memo from the Intelligence Committee about incidental surveillance of Trump, and why isn’t the liberal media talking about it like they do the Trump-Russia collusion?
We are waiting for Trump or any GOP member of the House to actually release it, so there’s actually something to talk about.Then we’ll probably talk about how it was written by the GOP staff, not the FBI, and wonder why they didn’t just put out a press release.We’re certainly wondering why we’re supposed to be continually talking about Clinton — why GOP in Congress want us to be talking about Clinton.Then, we remember, despite having majorities in both houses, the presidency, and the supreme court — they still can’t pass even a continuing resolution, let alone an actual budget.If somehow, a four-page memo proved anything at all, or even that Clinton was head of an international crime syndicate responsible for 90% of all sex trafficking, and a 100% monopoly on organ harvesting keeping septuagenarian billionaires alive —- it would not improve the record of Congress or the president at all, nor justify a single one of their actions, or their inactions.This is clearly a smoke screen — or they would already have released it.It is NOT the Democrats who are holding it up. How could they? The GOP is in control.So ask yourself — what is this smokescreen about?Distract from the extremely unpopular tax bill that explodes the deficit?Distract from the extremely unpopular expulsion of DACA parents, separating fathers and mothers from their citizen children?Distract from the millions losing their health insurance?Distract from the end of the extremely popular CHIP program, despite GOP claims they support it?Distract from their failure to hold the president accountable for his inability to perform his job, and his horrendously disqualified appointments?Distract from the threat of nuclear armageddon?Or … do they just want to keep the Democrats arguing among themselves about Clinton, so they have a fighting chance to not lose just about everything they have to lose in November?
Can the Democratic Party save America from conservative authoritarianism?
No actually the democrat party is the one you need to be afraid of, they are socialist and only want to enslave you to be totally dependent on the government for your very existence. Look what they have done in the name helping you. They created the KKK to control the black people, to keep them from voting republican because President Lincoln had freed the slaves and they didn’t like it. Then the democrat party started the bi-lingual studies for the spanish speaking people so they wouldn’t learn english because you must have a good command of English to get anywhere in this country. Then they abandoned the black people and the latinos for illegals and not just any illegals but MS-13 gang members and others such as the muslims who want to take over every country they go to. Look at Europe and all the muslim countries around the world they all have one thing in common they even hate each other, the Sunni hate the Shiite and war against them all the time. What was Obama? He went to school, a muslim school, in Indonesia and his father was a communist in Kenya, while his step father was a muslim and he sealed all his records including his birth certificate so nobody could find out just what he was. He then flooded our government with muslims to help change America which was his goal.Don’t just take my word for it do your own research and don’t depend on the democrat party to tell you anything. Check all the facts everywhere don’t just read or listen to one side. Our schools have changed and they don’t teach History at least not American history. The democrat party pushed abortion through to limit the minority races, again research the beginnings of Roe vs Wade, who started it who pushed it who was the leader. These are the things that they don’t want you to know, they just want you to blindly follow what ever they say. We tell you to do your own research and look things up while you still can.
What do you think of Obama, Dodd & Frank being included in Judicial Watch's 10 Most Corrupt Politicians?
Also, I'm very aware that Judicial Watch describes itself as "a conservative, non-partisan American educational foundation that promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law." That's why I mentioned they lambasted Huckabee and Guiliani. That's also why I asked whether you thought what they did was that bad. I don't need comments on judicial watch.