Do Ted And Snowflake Go Away If You Fail The Case

Is there a fake Rolex that is so perfectly made that it can't be spotted?

Actually, the answer is yes. There are Rolex copies that cannot be spotted. Rolex uses 904L steel. For the longest time, the copies used 316L steel and you can feel the difference in the wristband. However, the NOOB factory is now making one of their Rolex copies with 904L. That same copy also uses sapphire glass, which is the same as that used by Rolex. NOOB makes many versions, and the 904L steel model is the NOOB version 8 Rolex. Sometimes referred to as Noob v8. Anyway, this particular copy also has a magnified dated cyclops. At this point, I am not sure if the anti-glare sapphire is used on the cyclops. (If not, there will be a glare when trying to read the date through the cyclops.)I am writing this because I read other reviews stating that the copies do not use 904L steel. For 95% of the copies, that is true. But for the NOOB version 8, it is actually 904L steel. These copies are very expensive compared to the 316L copies. For example, 316L copies with sapphire glass can run $150+. The Noob v8 copies are $650–850 as of this writing. In fact, finding one for $650 is difficult. For the most part they are purchased from China through DH gate website. You also have to confirm with the seller that you are purchasing 904L steel model because a lot of sellers claim they have the latest Noob model when in fact they don’t.I have to mention that there are many different versions of automatic movements inside of these copies. The most expensive will use a copy of the Rolex movement 3135. This movement looks a lot like the Rolex movement but obviously it’s Chinese and much cheaper. Some of the copies will use the Swiss ETA 2824, or 2826. These Swiss movements are obviously good quality and are not Chinese made. Any jeweler in the US worth his salt will be able to remove the caseback and see that you have a copy and not a real Rolex. But if you show up with a Noob v8, they won’t be able to tell unless they remove the case back. Even then, the Chinese version of the 3135 movement may still fool some jewelers.

As a conservative, do you distrust the "main-stream-media", and if so, do you trust Fox News? As a Liberal, do you distrust Fox News, and if so, do you trust the "main-stream-media"?

First off, even though my current views align about 90% with “liberals", I am not a “liberal". I call myself an “anti powerist”. (I wish I could come up with a less silly word for it). I believe in a balance of powers.I was a libertarian for about 20 years because I felt the government had too much power (I grew up in the era of Nixon). Now I'm a democrat, partially because I feel business and the rich have too much power. But more than anything, it finally dawned on me that the poor, handicapped and weird have always had far too little power and it's getting much, much worse recently.FOX? They pretty much are the “main-stream-media". They may have started out as the opposition to the big 3 (CBS, ABC, NBC), but they are completely dominant now. I not only know they're ridiculously slanted and grossly inaccurate, they have the strongest tendency to sensationalize the news. That's what the “main-stream-media” does. That's their raison d'être. Ever since the fairness doctrine was eliminated and broadcasting companies were expected to make a profit off of the news instead of treating it as a community service, they have to provide entertainment. Sensationalism, fear, hatred and anger draws eyeballs and makes money.You can't get real news from “main-stream-media”. As much as I love some of the MSNBC shows, I do tire of the constant excessive emphasis on what the bad guys have done. If you want actual news you can only get it in print with an occasional smattering of PBS and BBC.But FOX is much worse than any of them.One thing that some people seem to think is indicative of an “unbiased" slant, is when they present the “good” side of what trump does. They actually praise trump when he does things that normal, decent people do! That's bad! Believe it or not, yes, that's bad! When you're dealing with a poorly behaved child, you have to do that in order to gradually adjust their behavior. But when you're dealing with a world power, treating normallity as praiseworthy defines normallity and goodness downwards. I have seen almost nothing trump does as “good" so I refuse to define the “normal" things he's done as good.

If a person actually commits a crime and goes to jail should we feel sorry for them? Or condemn them as being 'evil' or something?

It depends on the crime.  While it is true that some prisoners at the federal level are in jail for drug offenses which are violent only when dealers fight each other over market share, most state prisoners are in for violent crimes or property crimes like burglary.In a sense, I am sorry for any form of waste, particularly the waste of a life, but in general, criminals knowingly choose to break the law.  Whether they're evil or not depends on the definition, of course.  Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, author of The Gulag Archipelago, described a form of evil when he warned Harvard graduates of:"an atmosphere of moral mediocrity, paralyzing man's noblest impulses" and a "tilt of freedom in the direction of evil ... evidently born primarily out of a humanistic and benevolent concept according to which there is no evil inherent in human nature."He also said, “In order for men to commit great evil, they must first be convinced that they are doing good.”I am not sure that applies to criminals.  What do you think?