Why do liberal lie and claim republicans haven't won the popular vote since HW Bush?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2004 That's a pretty overwhelming win especially if you look at the map. And why does it matter? W Bush won in 2000 according to the rules. Saying Bush didn't really win would be like saying UCONN didn't really beat Florida because they didn't score any touchdowns. The rules of basketball don't give points for touchdowns just like the presidential election isn't determined by popular vote. How many republicans in CA and NY do you think sat out the election because they knew their vote wouldn't matter? Maybe if you change the rules you get a different result. W won by the rules. Saying he didn't really win is just a guess. And if you want a meaningful statistic about popular vote how about the fact that Obama is the first democrat candidate in 60 years to get over half the vote. And given the historical nature of his candidacy and the weakness of his opponents that shouldn't be surprising.
Why do hispanics come to America and use government welfare programs and have so many children?
Much of the Hispanic population in the US is genetically-predisposed to a way of life quite different than that in the US. The "Euro" model of civilization runs counter to the ancestry (and therefore the genetic heritage) of many Hispanics in the US. But because many Hispanics have needed to flee their countries of origin and arrive in the US illegally - unless the immigrated legally - they must struggle to survive despite their propensities. One such propensity is that which you mentioned: the tendency to "over-reproduce"! The Hispanic cultures believe in family and in high-volume reproduction regardless of the cost - either to themselves or to the society in which they live. Much of this tendency is encouraged by Catholicism - which their ancestors either brought over from southwestern Europe or had forced upon them if they were Native American. Hence, the cycles of poverty continue - even in places they migrate to. Many Irish happen to be Catholic as well, but the difference is that Irish had to learn earlier that over-reproduction can be (and often is) self-oppressive. It seems too many Hispanics have not yet learned that lesson and are still due their comeuppance! America is weaker today than it was 30 to 40 years ago, largely due to mass migrations from Latin-American countries.
Why are 3rd parties so weak?
-Americans are taught at an early age Democracy means two candidates, not three or more. -Not enough people are independents or swing voters to make a third party viable. -The parties have too much power to allow a third party to get traction -If one of the two parties would split or cease to exist, then a third party would replace it but then would no longer be a "third" party.