Am i the only one that thinks Maria Shriver looks like a SKELETON?
no your not..I always think..my goodness..she must of put a serious dent in the ugly stick when she was wacked with it.
Do you think that Rose Tyler looks a little ape-like?
She does look a little ape -like but don't we all?
Why do I think Tarkin from Rogue One looks completely 100% real, despite knowing he is CGI, while everyone else thinks he looks CGI?
Partly because most of the shots involving Tarkin are staged on the command bridge of the Death Star, and thus Tarkin is at least partly in shadow as the station moves through space, first near Jedha (between the planet and its sun, in fact) and then near Scarif. So he’s naturally in shadow a lot, which helps a great deal with the illusion.
Girls, what do you think looks better on a guy - gold or silver?
i personally like silver over gold but i also think it depends on your skin tone. if you are darker or tanner than i think silver looks much better than gold, but if your lighter i think the gold looks better. Then again its also a personal preference. try both of them on and see which looks the best on you! Good luck!
If a child looks more like one parent does that mean they have more DNA from that parent?
Nope!As others have already said , your child gets the same number of chromosomes from each pareent i.e. 23 from each.If the child resembles one parent more physically then it just means that the form of some genes (e,g, gene for detached ear lobes or hair curliness) are more dominant than others.Everything in the child’s morphological development is governed by the action of genes. A simple example often used in school:If the mum holds a pair of genes for detached (the easy obvious lobes for earrings or piercing!) ear lobes then the eggs will only have a ‘detached lobe’ gene. If the father on the other hand has a pair of genes for attached ones his sperm will have only an ‘attached lobe’ gene . So the baby will have one from each parent. The ‘detached’ is the dominant one , the gene’s trump card, and as a result the child will have detached ear lobes like its dad.[images from Wiki]The traits the offspring possess are not just the obvious visible ones; blood type, immune responses and allergies, character traits and host of other things you can’t see.Some features are a subtle mixture resulting from the action of several genes from both parents; if the dad has a massive shoe size and the mum is a dainty ballerina the chances are the child’s foot will be something in between.Sexual reproduction is a genius at providing the variety that makes our species better at evolving and surviving.
Do you think everyone looks extremely attractive to at least one person?
No.Not objectively and not if real life statistics have something to say about it.There is an intellectual and moral fallacy when people say things like “everyone is beautiful,” or that “there is someone out there for you/everyone,” those are not objective truths.Those are statistically wrong, not to mention objectively wrong. Sure, beauty can be subjective when measured in cultural terms and the like.But the reality is that we are all attracted to healthy, reasonably good people. And there are a ton of ugly, horrible excuses for human beings out there. Maybe you just have not met them. But trust me, they exists.Those quotes I stated above as just lines people tell each other in order to disguise the unfair truth that life is well, unfair. Before we made civilization and monogamy a thing, for example, the anthropological record seems to indicate that almost 70%+ of all women only mated with about 20%+ of all men. Since well, women only went for the hottest/most powerful/strongest (contextually speaking) partners. This sort of species behaviour is nothing strange and occurs often in many species in the natural world.And even now, as we try to balance the relationship/sex game by pushing people into monogamous relationships, the reality is that not everyone will find a happy relationship. Not everyone will find the partner they find the most attractive (or even attractive, and thus, you can’t assume their partner might be *IT* for them really) or the one they are the happiest with. Or marry out of love — I a m looking at you, India and middle east.There are ton of people in the world who are alone. Not to mention a lot of people who do not deserve to be in a relationship and a ton of people who are almost un-date-able for a multitude of reasons. I mean, how much do you want to lower your bar?The point is life is not fair. We might not want to live like it is, but it is. Not everyone get the same or best hand. Regardless of gender.Therefore, not everyone is “attractive.” Period. Therefore there are individuals out there who no one will see as a catch.
I aint look down but i see no one above me...?
Dude hes talking about the top of the charts best in hip hop he is basicly saying he is the best and everyone is below him
Do you think this hair style would look good on me???[PICTURES INCLUDDED!!!!]?
this is me...now http://www.myspace.com/lizsmith95 im the one on the right. this is the hair i like: http://z.about.com/d/beauty/1/0/d/f/asianhair36.JPG do you think it would look good on me?????? in my hair color though??? also....if you think it would look god....is there anything i can do to REALY make my hair grow faster???
Do you look different in other peoples eyes than what you think you look?
Congratulations on asking one of the few questions where reading everyone else's answer is more fun that contributing your own. A facinating mix and so far ALL valid view points. There is the philisophical answers and the vanity/physical type answers. Here's my basic view. Physical: When you hear your own voice most of the time you hear the sound conducted through your skull. It makes a huge difference. Likewise, when you look in a mirror you see a mirror image. Almost nobody will see you that way unless you look in one together. Another less obvious thing is your height. You look at the world from the height of your eyes. Remember that unless your're a snail (eye balls on a stalk) you are actually two or three inches taller than that. Philisophical: Dispite how many people are in the world and how close our proximity to any of them, even our own family. How can anyone really truelly KNOW us? If you are just not good at expressing your feelings it doesn't mean you are in anyway shallow. It really just means you are more isolated. Here's a couple crusher questions tho: Do you really know yourself? Is possible that someone out there knows you better than you know yourself?