Do you think it is possible to wash your skin too much and damage it as a result? why or why not?
Yes, you can wash your skin too much! It is healthy to slough off dead skin cells on a regular basis using a mild soap and even a terry cloth wash rag. However, if you actually scrub hard you risk damaging the 'new' skin that lies just beneath. When you do that, it is like causing abrasions -- you are exposing layers of skin that are not ready to be exposed. This sets you up for a vicious cycle -- you can even cause infection. Even when you have skin that is prone to acne and blemishes, scrubbing too hard or too often can actually make those conditions worse. Better to stay with sensible washing habits and leave it at that. If you are concerned about a skin condition -- seek medical attention; you can't 'wash' away the problem...
Do you think it could be possible for us to continue in The Elder Scrolls 6 with the same character we created (The Last Dragonborn) in Skyrim? If so, how would you feel about it?
Regarding the possibility, it's entirely up to the developer.If you're asking whether it is realistically possible, it is quite likely. They can pull the same trick that Bioware did with their Mass Effect trilogy, where your save game from ME 1 can be used for ME 2 and so on.But honestly, the chance is pretty slim. Throughout the Elder Scrolls franchise, the main character backgrounds are always different, and unless Bethesda wants to use the TES V Skyrim popularity to jack up the TES VI sales by making both of them related, it's not likely to happen.
Do you think it could be possible to tie a shoe by shaking it for an infinite amount of time? Why is that?
Possible, but unlikely to the point of never.Entropy is running… things tend to fall apart, rather than fall together.In the same way that bricks falling down do not spontaneously fall into a useful building, shaking shoelaces do not spontaneously tie themselves.Now, if you want to talk about tangled instead of tied…Let’s talk about any random kid with laced up sneakers, who either 1) can’t keep the shoes laced or 2) can’t un-tie them because they mysteriously turned into knots.(This Is Why Your Shoelaces Are Always Untied - D-brief)Let’s talk about the garden hoses that are tossed in a corner and turn themselves into celtic knots.And the Award for Best Garden Hose Goes to . . .
Do you think it could one day be possible to replace CPU's with human brains?
Nope. Never. Simply put, CPUs do something very different from the human brain. A CPU is a collection of transistors that function somewhat like logic gates… and I’m simplifying this but essentially you’re feeding bits through a logic gate. A CPU can respond to things based on what order ones and zeroes pass through.So let’s start giving reasons why a human brain won’t work this way. First off, computers can do math quickly in a binary system. Having everything in ones and zeroes makes everything super easy to work with. The most relateable thing in a brain to the CPUs are neurons, and neurons don’t work in binary… There is a complex array of information based off of which neurons fire off in what order among other things.CPUs also do billions of these operations per second… Neurons only fire 200 times per second at most. A human brain would be really slow at running computer calculations.Basically, a CPU is good at crunching raw data quickly, which is what we use computers for. A human brain can fire off neurons in a way that can form complex thought, which is what we need brains for. These two are not interchangeable and would not be good for each other’s tasks.
Do you think time travel will ever be possible?
I do have my own theory on this, though I'm no genius when it comes to science. I believe that if we ever did successfully patent time traveling and made it accessible, that someone would have already traveled back in time to talk to us or warn us of something in the future and the media would have been all over it. That's why I don't believe we will ever or have ever(speaking in future terms) been able to travel back in time. Yet I actually do think at some point we will be able to time travel to the future, and we'll be able to accomplish this by using something we do everyday, sleep. I think one day scientists could control how long we sleep and while to everyone else, it isn't time traveling, to the person sleeping/unconscious for said amount of time, it will be quick. It wouldn't prevent aging, but you could only travel for as long as your life-span would allow, though. Something like cryogenics. Anyways, does anyone else have any theories on this or believe that's it''s possible at all?
Do you think it's possible that mitochondria might now be able to exist independently if removed from a cell?
well you could just take them out of the cell... but they wouldn't live mitochondria probably were independent organisms that ended up living inside other cells over time though, they've lost genes necessary for independent life
Do you think it’s possible for a human to love you even half as much as your dog loves you?
No, dogs are loyal, humans sleep around. Dogs are happy with what they have. Humans always ask for more, some start nagging and nagging, then deny love if you don't give them what they want.
Do you think it will be possible for the novel Halloween (1979) by Curtis Richards to be reprinted some day in the future?
So there’s this book PDF that I read online called Halloween. It was released in 1979 and based on the film of the same name by John Carpenter the previous year in 1978. Apparently, there was recently a novelization for the 2018 film, and at this point in time, the 1979 novel is RARE and in most cases commands no less than $100 on eBay. Titan Publishing reissued the novelization for Alien (1979), so one would think maybe Bantham (assuming they still have publishing rights) could ether reprint the book or lend the rights to Titan (since they did the same for Alien and published the Halloween (2018) novelization). If so, is it possible to start an online petition to get it republished?
Do you think it could be possible for the Libertarian party to win the U.S. Presidency?
No. Unfortunately, no.The Libertarian Party is not a political party; it’s a social party, which represents pure libertarianism (about 1 or 2 percent of the country). You can’t win anything with those numbers.A political party is full of people who realize that each member’s views are rare. So they must rub shoulders with others who might share some basic values, but are different in many ways. An example would be pro-lifers in the Republican Party. Although they don’t like sharing a platform with (in their minds) baby murderers, they have no choice… the Pro-Life Party would get about 10% of the vote and wouldn’t win anything. They’re smarter than the party of reason, oddly enough.And it’s a shame. This country definitely needs another party since the other two are corrupt, incompetent, radical (Democrats) and gutless (Republicans). Voters cast their lonely eyes to the Libertarians and the Libertarians are busy discussing how to privatize ballistic missiles.