Economic Question.?
Please help me anyone!!! Suppose the central bank wants to achieve an inflation rate equal to 1% and the current growth rate of real GDP is 2%. If the quantity theory of money holds, what should the Fed set the money growth rate equal to? (Hint: Use the equation of exchange in growth-rate form.) THankyou so much in advance!!!
How is future price related to current demand? (economics)?
A. if the price is expected to rise, current demand will drop. B.if the price is expected to fall, current demand will rise. C. if the price is expected to rise, current demand will rise. D. Future price is not related to current demand. I myself believe it is c but im unsure and want a second opinion and why it is wrong, if you know please explain to me. Thank You.
What do these turnover ratios indicate?
FATO = Net Sales / Net Property, Plant & Equipment TATO = Net Sales / Total Assets since total assets = net fixed assets + current assets notice the difference between the two is the current assets... if the second ratio is low for the industry, it tells you the company has 'excessive' levels of current assets - it could be inventory (perhaps indicating slower inventory turnover), but it could also be high accounts receivable - which could be good or bad - A/R turns into cash, or perhaps they're seeing a slowdown in customers paying their bills on time, or an improper allowance for bad accounts, or it could be a lot of cash sitting on the sidelines. So 'excessive' is relative. Keep in mind that the first ratio could be low because the fixed assets are old, and thus more depreciated...indicating a possible need to replace plant and equipment in the near future. If those same fixed assets were new, the denominator would be higher and the ratio would be lower. So, your "good" ratio of a low FATO could be misleading.
What is the meaning of economic interdependence? Give examples?
interdependence-people, businesses, and nations depend on each other examples:trade,import,export
Can you hide past employment from future employer?
In case that you have been forced by the current economic conditions to work a non-professional job for up to six months, are you obliged to put it on your resume? What if you worked a professional job for lets say 2 or 3 months which eventually had an adverse outcome for you (like being fired). Could you skip this on your resume and just say that you have been unemployed during this time? Is there any way an employer could check all the sources of your income (through the IRS I guess) and thus find out an employer which you have not put on your resume? Would that automatically end your chances for employment in case: 1.This is a non-professional job, which you have been forced to work due to unemployment and economic hardship and is irrelevant to your professional skills. 2.This is a professional job, where you have been terminated after three months for severe argument with your boss.