Election Was Stole: Why the GOP Won't Challenge Vote Fraud?
The Republican Party made an agreement 30 years ago with the Democrat Party NOT to ensure voting integrity and NOT to pursue suspected vote fraud. Please Read the Rest of the article and court papers. In fact, legally the GOP cannot ensure voting integrity, nor can it prevent vote fraud. Obama only won by 406,348 votes in 4 states: Florida: 73,858 Ohio: 103,481 Virginia: 115,910 Colorado: 113,099 Those four states, with a collective margin of 406,348 votes for Obama, add up to 69 electoral votes. Had Romney won 407,000 or so additional votes in the right proportion in those states, he would have 275 electoral votes. All four states showed Romney ahead in the days leading up to the election. But on November 6, Romney lost all four states by a substantial margin, all of which have precincts that inexplicably went 99% for Obama, had voter registrations that exceeded their population, and had experienced problems with voting machines. This election was stolen by the Democrats via vote fraud. Despite all the evidence of fraud, the Republican Party has been strangely silent about it. http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/e... http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress... http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/... http://www.rnla.org/votefraud.asp
If Obama wins this election, what would be the new GOP strategy be?
They already tried to demonizing him as a socialist, muslic, communist, nazi, you name it. Will they this time try to build up America and take credit for that instead of trying to make it worse and blaming it on Obama?
Are the 2018 midterm elections going to be a replay of the 2016 election?
I hope so. It was hilarious watching democrats wail like babies that lost their binky. That smug holier than thou attitude was replaced by a lot of whining and crying. It was hilarious!!! Reading this article claiming “PTSD” is laughable. Really? Try getting shot at for 18 hours straight!!! These people dont have thr backbone to run the country. All the bed wetters should go find a safe space before they are overcome with PTSD. Hilary was the only one i wanted to see elected less than Trump. If luck is with us Feinstein will crawl bakc undee the rock she came from.
Will the GOP be obsolete after the midterm elections?
No. However, the Democrats have been making themselves obsolete for close to a decade now. The Democrat Party has been in a state of decline literally since the start of Obama's first oath of office. In 2009, Democrats had the White House, both chambers of Congress, most of the governorships, most of the state legislatures, and the big cities.In 2017, all of that had change except for the cities. They lost the House in 2010, the Senate in 2014, and the White House in 2016. During that time, the majority of governors have changed into Republican hands and most of the state houses are controlled by Republicans as well. The only significant power base the Democrats retain are the big cities. They are, in a very real sense, little more than municipal party at this point.It's hard to say what the portends for the party. Their numbers haven't budged by much since the start of this decline. Once Republicans gained their majorities in the various categories, they have pretty much stayed where they are (or have gone up).Keep in mind that all of this continued to be the case even during a presidential election which held out the promise of the first female president. In fact, Obama recently campaigned for Democrat candidates in California districts that voted for Clinton yet have Republicans representing them in Congress. Those voters split their vote in 2016 which has to be disturbing to the DNC.
If the Democrats lose seats in the 2014 midterm elections, does that vindicate the Republicans shutdown strategy?
Probably not. The only possible way to spin the shutdown positively for Republicans is that it reminded the people yet again how opposed Republicans are to the Affordable Care Act. Once the shutdown was over, and ACA's enrollment issues became painfully obvious, Republicans were suddenly vindicated with their criticism of the law.But that's an observation about ACA, not about the shutdown. I think some of the political evaluation of the shutdown has been overstated - you've probably heard pundits call it an "unmitigated disaster," for one example I heard frequently - but as far as I've seen, the macropolitical impact of the shutdown has been minor. If Republicans win enough seats to take back the Senate, Democrats will likely blame ACA and historical trends. I don't think the shutdown factors into it.
Why did 2013 shutdown not adversely impact GOP in 2014 elections?
It’s counterintuitive but Republicans frame issues by stating that government is inept, is incapable of any meaningful changes. So, in a way, if the government shuts down, even though they are responsible for it, it validates their worldview. Republican office holders explicitly say, people in Washington cannot do anything, should not do anything. Thus by electing people with this view of government, they get into office and do exactly that: nothing. It does however seem to prove what they’ve been saying all along about the inefficacy of government. Democrats still cling to the notion that as an institution government can help people in some instances. But, when Republicans took the House and were unwilling to pass legislation, and shut down the government, it undermined Democrats more than Republicans.
Who is saying the smartest things about the strategy for the Democrats going forward from the 2014 US Midterm Elections?
Anyone who realizes this fundamental truth: American's who vote and those who could vote but choose not to do so, want above all, a message that reveals a possible future. See Obama 2008 or Clinton 1992. Now whether or not you believe the candidate fulfilled the rhetoric is debatable, what is not though, is the messages importance to eventual success. Obama overcame the Clinton political machine by presenting a narrative offering "a new Washington," and the most vague, yet powerful maxim, "hope & change." So the best advice for Democrats today is: stop running from your base, trying to woo conservative voters. We see right through that and find it wholly disingenuous, if not disgusting. Populism is named such because the message is popular to the majority. Stop treating possible candidates like Senator's Sanders and Warren as political cones for Hillary to avoid and more like the popular messengers they are too the Liberal voters in America.
How will Obamacare affect the midterm elections?
The prevailing theories at the moment:Positive impact for Republicans, as the majority disapprove of the way Obama has handled health care and Obamacare will stimulate GOP turnoutNo significant impact, as voters have a short memory and election is eight months awayNo significant impact, as approval/disapproval of Affordable Care Act largely falls along party linesNo significant impact, because the GOP already has an advantage in these midterms for multiple reasons (low presidential approval ratings, historical trend of president's party losing seats in midterm elections, historical trend of higher GOP turnout during midterm elections, Democrats up for re-election who benefited from an unusually good year for their party in 2008) Slight positive impact for Democrats, as Republicans are over reliant on making Obamacare an issue (while not offering a viable alternative) when voters no longer care enough or are changing/moderating their opinions as benefits start to kick inSee also: Polls show Obamacare has driven down Obama's approval ratings. How will this affect the 2014 and 2016 elections?