TRENDING NEWS

POPULAR NEWS

Exactly What Does Obama Mean When He Calls For A

If you call someone transparent what does it mean exactly?

It usually means that you can see through their deceptions and lies.

Why did Trump call Obama a cheater? What exactly did he cheat on?

Donald Trump likes to say that he went to the Wharton School of Business, which, while respectable, is much easier to get into once you’ve started college somewhere else, as Trump did. What does Donald Trump mean when he says, 'I went to Wharton'?Barack Obama went to the Harvard School of Law. Harvard is universally recognized as one of the best schools in the world, and getting into their law school requires caliber of the highest order.Trump claims that Obama cheated to get into Harvard, probably from misguided assumptions that he himself is much smarter than Obama because Obama is black. Trump has been known to call blacks “lazy”, so that probably extends to the Kenyan Muslim who used to be President. Considering that Trump is a stable genius himself, he no doubt makes the fanatical leap from “Obama is black” and “all blacks are lazy” to “Obama must have cheated to get into Harvard since he is lazy”.Once again, Trump reveals more about himself than he probably ever wanted to with misguided insults against a man who carries himself with more integrity than Trump could muster in his lifetime.

What does it mean when someone calls a woman a "train wreck"?

sounds like she has had some fun in her life

What did Trump mean when he called Obama the founder of ISIS?

The question: “What did Trump mean when he called Obama the founder of ISIS?”I offer you three interpretations.The most generous interpretation:That US middle eastern policy under President Obama contributed to the creation of the power vacuum in Syria and Iraq that allowed ISIS to establish itself as a regional power. The suggestion being that if President Obama had adopted a more aggressive, more proactive interventionist policy then this ISIS offshoot of al-Qaida would have not have come to be, is frankly naive. At it simplest level it ignores the fact that the US invaded Iraq in 2003.However this is the explanation the Trump campaign would have offered in an attempt to justify Trump’s intentionally provocative claim.The second, interpretation:Trump and the campaign wanted a ‘sound bit’ that would get Trump on the news and they would defend the provocative nature of the claim by saying that it was an important issue and they wanted people sit up and take notice.In effect the Trump campaign were playing the sound bite game to which news and media coverage of political campaigns has been reduced.The third and least favourable interpretationThis was an entirely dishonourable attempt to smear the good name and standing of President Obama by baselessly associating his name with that of terrorists.A shallow disreputable attack that any reasonable American ought to have been ashamed of. That such an attack was made by the presidential candidate of the Republican party ought only to increase the embarrassment that would hold itself up as a democracy. That the Republican party did not immediately demand that Trump retract the accusation is an affront to the US and an illustration of the depths to which partisan politics has sunk in the US.Worse still is the insult to Republican voters that Trump and his campaign should have so little respect for them ,that they would offer up this dubious suggestion presented in a manner clearly intended to suggest that President Obama was personally sympathetic to terrorists. An insult made worse by Trump calculated repetition of President Obama’s full name Barack Hussein Obama in order to overemphasis the President Obama’s middle name.It is regrettable that of the three interpretations, it is the deplorable, inexcusable third explanation, that is by far the most likely.

I heard someone call Obama a "mustard seed". What does that mean?

church multiplication
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=na...

FOX News just called the debate for Obama. Does that mean we are all in agreement?

OK, I'll admit the last two debates could easily be argued as stalemates. But FOX news pundits, including a guy from the Weekly Standard thinks that McCain was tough in the beginning, then once Obama swatted the Ayers issue into the stands like a weak layup, it because one sided. Does anyone disagree with the most conservative publication and TV station in the country?

What did Obama mean when he said you can keep your current plan?

He meant you wouldnt be able to keep your plan.

Lying is a technique by which politicians further their goals

TRENDING NEWS