TRENDING NEWS

POPULAR NEWS

Expert Grammarians Does This Sentence Really Need The Article

Can someone pleaae diagram this comlex sentence for me .?

He-subject
who-subjective relative prounoun
would be-modal base verb
famous-adjective
(all of above is a dependant clause/subjective phrase)

must be-modal base verb --True verb of sentence

a-indefinte article
hard-adjective
worker-noun/complement

while-prep of time
he-subject of phrase
is-stative verb
obscure-adjective
(prepositional phrase of time)

i think?
dD

What does "you can't end a sentence with a preposition" mean? What are some examples?

It means someone is trying to enforce a rule that is not actually part of English grammar. It’s the equivalent of “Yorkshire terriers must have their hair tied in one or two bows” — which is an actual rule of the AKC for judging Yorkshire terriers in dog shows. It has nothing to do with actual English grammar, just as whether a Yorkie has its hair in a bow or bows has nothing to do with whether the dog is actually a Yorkie.However, just as you have to worry about the bow rule if you’re entering your Yorkie in dog shows, you may have to worry about that rule if you’re writing formal English to be judged by someone else. So you should avoid ending a sentence with a preposition in such situations.You can find an article that explains prepositions here: Prepositions | Oxford DictionariesThe problem comes because there are some verbs that can be followed by a preposition to indicate particular usages. For example, “take” can be followed by “out” to indicate bringing something to another location: “I’m going to take out the garbage.” In some English dialects, this would normally be said as “I’m going to take the garbage out.” The latter formulation would violate the rule against ending a sentence with a preposition.In some cases, people use prepositions when they are redundant. For example, “Where’s Tom at?” is common in some dialects, but “Where’s Tom?” is perfectly acceptable and has the same meaning. In a case like that, you can simply remove the preposition.

Why do "Articles" not mention as a part of speech?

Traditional grammarians say there are 8 parts of speech, as one of the other people who answered your question listed. They typically consider articles a form of determiner and place determiners in the adjective category. Yet they are so different from most other adjectives: they don’t have comparative or superlative forms, for instance, and they don’t really have a lexical meaning. They also always come at the first of a noun phrase, which is unlike other adjectives. Many modern grammarians of the English language have noted that traditional English grammar is based on Latin and thus does not fit the English language very well. In studying English, they have decided that there are better ways of categorizing things (that add up to considerably more than just 8 categories). They don’t feel, in other words, that they must fit everything into 8 categories just because that’s what worked in describing Latin. So many of them speak of word classes rather than 8 parts of speech. Nouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs are the form classes. (They provide most of the lexical meaning of what we say, and they usually can take form changes, such as the change of a noun to plural and possessive and the changes in tense of a verb.) There are a number of other classes called function classes, and among the various function classes are determiners. Articles are (as also recognized in traditional grammar) a type of determiner. But in modern grammar, determiners aren’t shoved into the adjective category.

What's the best free grammar checker on the Internet?

That would have to be the free grammar checker tool.Effective communication is an integral aspect for any business setup. Management and staff often keep each other updated with the latest reports and news pertaining to the business, and external communications with clients and suppliers are also regularly done. In the course of all these, it is important that you always use proper grammar in all your business communications. It is a standard that the management should practice and demand from all its employees to maintain the good reputation of the business and to propel the business to success. To understand this better, here are the advantages of using proper grammar in all communications.A professional approachPoor grammar is one of the reasons why customers avoid certain companies. When users visit your website and read poorly constructed sentences, the initial impression would be that the site and the company behind it are not trustworthy. This is why it is always important that you check and proofread your work before posting or sending messages. A simple spelling mistake can lose you a customer and that would be your competitor’s gain. Using proper grammar denotes a professional approach to business. By constructing a well-written letter or response to a query, you are giving your customers and suppliers the impression that as business professionals, you are treating all your transactions seriously and you value them highly.

What are some grammatical errors you’ve seen that drive you nuts?

I don’t mind grammatical errors too much, because either the person is an ill educated native speaker, and one should not be censorious about someone else’s misfortune in not having had a very good education, or the person is not a native speaker and they are still grappling with the language. They are much more likely to improve than the badly spoken native speaker though.I don’t like it when people have strong opinions about grammar which are wrong or too rigid though. Many native speakers and also expert grammarians declare a ‘rule’ which they may have extracted by observation, and they will assert it as the gold standard. But really, language isn’t like that. We are not robots, or even machines. Our brains make and use language to fit our culture and our experiences. They don’t do this according to some program written by a grammarian. It is interesting to study language and observe these rules, but it is wrong to see them as being set in stone. We live in an age long enough after the invention of the printing press to be able to read texts from previous centuries, and this makes it obvious that we have changed our languages over time, and will no doubt continue to do so. And in some old texts, you can see the same word being spelled in different ways, by the same author in one document.Having said all that, a pet dislike of mine is when people refer to the ‘following text’ as the ‘below text’. It’s quite logical, because we can say ‘the above text’, but I just don’t like it. I wish they would say ‘the text below’, or ‘the text following’, or ‘the following text’. And of course misuse of the apostrophe is always a good way to wind me up. Too often people use it when the word ends in ‘s’ because it is just a plural. It doesn’t need an apostrophe.Oh yes, there is something else that gets up my nose - errors cause by predictive spelling software present in many devices and text-handling programs. I just see red when you point these errors out to the author (or even query them about what they really meant), and he/she just gives the excuse that they typed it on their smartphone, and seems to take the attitude that ‘it’s not really my fault, it’s just life’. They don’t take responsibility for checking their own work, or better still learning how to switch off the predictive spelling feature.

What is a grammarian?

A grammarian is someone who has studied foundations in English and might linguistics. They are formidable in the language, across all units. Like words, sentences, bodies, paper structure, spelling, and many more. They can place it all in a framework to enable person to world, an application.Language after all, is an intangible relationship between the person and world. How you place your sentences makes the state of which you are conditioned to sense.The grammarian is highly skilled, and can make the rules work. The coverage includes word type formation in sentences, tense of sentence, or mood. This is nothing close to their taxonomy. You need to read a grammar book to appreciate their linguistic prowess.

How should the sentence “We must write to her.” be converted into passive voice?

I am just trying and do analyze, for I do not know this too.1st Choice:She must be written by us. (This is my answer)Using passive form, we must see first how the “by clause” works (hidden or not). Using to instead of “by” is non-sense. Why? Here it is!She must be written by us to attend the meeting next month. The word to implies the beginning of an adjective clause.Always remember this; the passive form of a sentense is always intruduced by “by clause” (sometime made written, sometime not necessary to say or include in a sentence).We dont have verb like this; “write to”, we have only “to write” verb.“Write to” is not a verb. So, we should not use “write to by”, or “written to by”!(Note. I dont want to place “to” in the sentense because placing “to” is suggesting the intention of the letter, not of the subject “we”. The word “ Written” for me is even not the acurate word to be used, instead, …. This is the cleared thought the sentence is talking about; “we must send her a letter to come here next meeting. (for something or to do something…)”2nd choice;It must be written to her- let us pulverize to see which is which in this sentence.What the it stands for?The “it” talks about the context/context/subjectthat needs to be written, —— it does not connect now about the letter that needs to be sent. The context of the subject question if we will compare to the 2 choice, we will see to it that it is far beyond to the imperative instruction’s content of the subject sentence comparing to the declative type of the sentence of the 2nd.The 1st sample sentence is an imperative sentence - it implies or expect somethingThe 2nd one is a declarative sentence - its predicate is only a complementary of the subject “it”.It is like we hold a banana, waving it by our hand, saying; this is a banana not an apple!

TRENDING NEWS