What should be the satisfactory answer in an interview if they ask why your academic percentage got gradually reduced from 90% till 12th to 70% in engineering?
A very reasonable and a valid question asked during interview related to low marks in your academics. There are some ways to handle this question effectively. First and foremost thing to remember and understand is that the job you applied has not to do too much with your past academic record. else you would have not been called for interview. Any interviewer will first go thru the resume and details and then shortlist the candidate. So you are already passed in that criteria.Now while answering this question, stay confident. Do not let the interviewer takeover you or your confidence. This is a chance for you to show them that you can perform under pressure and you learn from past mistakes and. failures. This will help an interviewer understand how well you can perform your duties in job.There must be some valid reason for getting low marks in academics, various reason could include, you being busy in other school or college activities, like helping other students, or spending too much time on sports activities or cultural activities, maybe some health issues, or family problems. Reasons can be many, stick to the main reason and do not lie. Chances are that initially you were not interested in the course but by the time you generated interest in it , it was too late.Emphasize more on your strengths and do not waste too much time explaining or giving excuses for low grades. Find out your achievements during this period and explain them. This will shift their focus from your academics to your strengths. Be ready with a plan how you will overcome it. Share your goals for next 3 / 6 / 9 and 12 months.It is very critical to sell yourself during an Interview.You cannot change the past, but with proper planning and zeal to excel you can live your present and shape your future.All the Best !
Statistics Help ASAP 10 points to best answer?
Can you hep me with this problem?(: The Harvey Motorcycle Company produces three models: the Tiger, a sure-looted dirt bike; the LX2000, a nimble cafe racer: and the Golden, a large interstate tourer. This month’s master production schedule calls for the production of 54 Golden’s, 42 LX2000s, and 30 Tigers per 7-hour shift. a. What average cycle time is required for the assembly line to achieve the production quota in 7 hours? b. If mixed-model scheduling is used how many of each model will be produced before the production cycle is repeated? c. Determine a satisfactory production sequence for the ultimate in small-lot production: one unit. d. The design of a new model, the Cheetah, includes features from the Tiger, LX2000, and Golden models. The resulting blended design has an indecisive character and is expected to attract sonic sales from the other models. Determine a mixed-model schedule resulting in 52 Golden’s, 39 LX2000s, 26 Tigers, and 13 Cheetahs per 7-hour shift. Although the total number of motorcycles produced per day will increase only slightly, what problem might be anticipated in implementing this change from the production schedule indicated in pan (b)?
Why do we find the number 10 (and its multiples) such a satisfactory benchmark number and its arithmetic application so simple?
Just adding to the other answers here (see no point in repeating information that's already well presented) - several other bases used in various cultures and civilizations, including 60, 20, 5, 4, binary, 12, and (unusually) base 27.We have traces of base 60 in the number of degrees in a circle (360) and of minutes in an hour and seconds in a minute.With some of those examples then the system might not have been used for very large numbers. I'm not sure if they all strictly count as "positional notation". Especially, I'd have thought, isn't really a positional system, properly speaking unless they count as far as 100 in the notation. And to be a positional system properly you need a concept of 0, or blank, or some way of writing numbers in a perfectly general way.But some definitely count as positional - would say the ancient Babylonian base 60 is a reasonably fully fledged alternative base positional system for instance. Didn't use 0 as we do but had a placeholder apparently, or left gaps though not in a very consistent wayThe gap between the 6 and the 9 to the right may be a hint of the "o"Babylonian numerals (MacTutor)(and wikipedia article Babylonian numerals)See the wikipedia article on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Po... and its section on Positional notation#Applicationsalso DuodecimalAnd for the base 27 system based on counting body parts, so 27 = "one man" see Base 27. (Wikipedia articles of course should be used with a bit of caution, if interested in some particular point follow up to the citation).Counting on Your Body in Papua New GunieaMIXED NOTATIONThough not exactly a "positional notation", in the old £ s d we had a mixed system of four farthings to a penny, twelve pennies to a shilling and twenty shillings to a pound, also had a florin consisting of two shillings.Similarly for other systems of weights and measures, often mix of different numbers e.g. in the old UK version of the Avoirdupois system, which I learned as a school child in the UK in the 1970s,16 drams make an ounce,16 ounces make a pound,14 pounds make a stone,2 stones make a quarter,four quarters make a hundredweight,twenty hundredweight make a ton.We all had that drilled into us when I was young, well apart from the 16 drams make an ounce, don't remember that bit.
10 POINTS for SATISFACTORY answers!!?
Using your cellphone example above, if you are describing facts such as features, measurements, battery info, model number, color(s), shape(s), you do NOT need to cite your source, and it is NOT plagiarizing. If YOU test or use the product, and write down your opinion or thoughts on the product, you do NOT need citation and again, it is NOT plagiarizing. Say... you see another article describing the strength of the phone signal, or any research-related facts or results done by another person, then you should cite the source. For example, another person conducted a research on cellphone signal strength or longevity of a cellphone battery. By using this information, you write in YOUR article about these results/quality of a product - in this case, you should cite the source of this information. In summary, if it's information that anyone can look up or widely known, you don't need to cite. If it's difficult to look up, or work was done to retrieve a fact, or you feel you should give credit to that source of information, then you should cite the source.
What criteria makes a solvent satisfactory for a recrystallization?
1. The stuff you want to crystallize isn't very soluble in it 2. The impurities are more soluble in it than the stuff you want to crystallize 3. Readily available and inexpensive. 4. Bonus if the safety office lets you pour it down the drain. LOL.
Twelfth night PLEASE ANSWER 10 POINTS!!!?
i am writing a newspaper article about the shipwreck scene in twelfth night and i need a quote from viola... i have made it so that viola is the only survivor so far
Organic chemistry question. 10 points for best answer show me how smart you are?
Way too much useless information... There is no satisfactory way to draw any molecular reactions in non-fixed-width fonts. Suffice to say that you place the three C=C double bonds in a hexagon with the rest pointing away, then start to flip the double bonds around (clockwise or counter clockwise, doesn't matter) so you get five single bonds and a double bond between the former two double bonds of the hexadienol. The mass of the hexadienol is 120 uL * 0.871 g/ml (in mg). To get the moles, divide by the molar mass (in g/mol), giving you a result in millimoles. The hexadienol has the sum formula C6OH10. Depending on the demanded accuracy, this makes the molar mass 6*12 g/mol + 16 g/mol +10*1 g/mol = 98 g/mol. Wikipedia gives you all the facts for maleic anhydride. Calculate the millimoles by dividing the 100 mg by the molar mass. For calculating the theoretical yield, take the lower of the two moles, and multiply with the molar mass of the product (the sum of the educts). Actual yield will differ. When melting the hexadienol first, you are likely to get a lower density. Probably better to weigh the result of the pipetting rather than rely on the theoretical calculation above, after all you already tared the beaker before. Recalculate the moles for the actual mass. You can make your life a bit easier by getting the mass of your stirring spatula, and weigh both beaker and spatula with the product. Since there are evaporations to be expected, the mass at the end of the experiment ought to be the same as at the start. A rise in mass will indicate that atmospheric water was attracted. A loss of mass will indicate a decarboxylation reaction. Expect the melting point to deviate from the value in literature - you have no cleaning step in your experiment, so any unreacted educt will remain in the mixture.
Please help this question is about orkut..10 points sure for satisfactory answers.?
i want to write "ABOUT ME" in my orkut profile but i want it very stylish like the following profile has: http://www.orkut.co.in/Main#Profile.aspx?rl=as&uid=1865226898162888435 please help me as i want my "ABOUT ME" description to be very stylish and please dont give unecessary answers as i have got previously in the same question .please help me seriously and i promise you 10 points