TRENDING NEWS

POPULAR NEWS

Give Arguments In Support Of The Actions Of The Characters. At Least Four Characters

What are the four types of characters in fiction?

There are four types of characters in fiction as the question states. The four types of characters refer to the way a character changes throughout a story. These four character types are: dynamic, flat, static, and round.Dynamic Character- A dynamic character is one that experiences a change in either their outlook or their personality. This form of change can either be one that is simple to see or could be one that happens subtly to the point where it’s hard to detect when the change started.Flat Character- A character who is flat is one that displays few personality traits and does not experience a change within the story. These characters don’t really have any layers to them, everything about them can be seen on the surface. These characters aren’t fully fleshed out but they are able to impact the story.Static Character- Static characters are characters who don’t develop at all during a story.Round Character- Round characters are characters who happen to be fully fleshed out. These characters will have a distinct personality, background, and motives.

Do you think that logical arguments are better support for a position than arguments that are based on authority or character?

The word 'authority' means two different things. In one sense it means someone who knows a lot about something, an expert you would go to for advice. In another sense it means someone who has the power to make a decision. I would trust an authority in the first sense, in fact good advice has been very useful to me in the past.

Otherwise, yes, a logical argument is best.

Beauty is given more importance than character. Why?

Because beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder :)Being a beautiful person has the least to do with physical appearance. It's our misguided judgements that draws illogical conclusion and understated remarks about the subject of beauty.A beautiful person is kind and humble. Such people possess the exceptional power to awestruck you with their generous being. They are not entitled to any selfish or condemning acts. They are open hearted people who welcome all kinds of weird things and do not go by dictating it's pros and cons for they believe every individual is unique in their own way and subjugating them to the untransparent societal norms isn't going to bring out the best in anyone. They are miraculously humble souls who try to lighten up your miserable life and help you in lessening the burden.Whereas character is the identity a person holds of himself. It's a thing a person tries to build up over a time with experience. It's based on his chief moral beliefs and his ability to accept others. Their morals and beliefs could stand out to be idealistic but they may be reluctant to view others opinion.A person with a good character is more suited to himself whereas a beautiful person is better suited to be with others.The reason being, a humble person could be willing to sidestep his/her priorities to help you out with your work from which they may not benefit at all but a person with a good character may or may not be willing to oversee their priorities for your sake.I am not trying to portray anyone bad in this situation, but you can always be sure to rely on a beautiful person and not be that sure with a person with a good character tag.

Why do some C functions take characters via arguments declared as int?

The C standard library functions that return characters report errors by returning a special value that is distinct from every possible char. That value is encoded as the macro EOF. Because of that, the return type cannot be char: it is int, and EOF is defined as an int value not equal to any char value.Because it is inconvenient to check the return value of every character handling function, most functions that take char input also allow EOF as input, and just pass it through: EOF in, EOF out. To allow EOF as input, the parameter type also must be int.(the situation is mirrored by wide character handling functions, which take and return wint_t, the type that is capable of representing every wchar_t plus the special value WEOF)

Does anyone have a logical argument supporting free will?

Surely, reactions in human affairs take place in accordance and response to an environment and we may fairly underline the tendencies of those actors in their decision. However, it does not entail in any manner that they could not potentially disrupt from them, nor that these circumstantial and natural indicator are the sole cause of human actions. Prove me beyond all reasonable doubt that this relation between cause and effects is not just a reflect of a man's judgement which would, in and of itself, express - insofar as we would or could admit it - his will. In more common terms, I pretend that coherence in agreement or disagreement with a given subject doesn't entail that the response is determined, but that the options are limited and coherent with the circumstances.

It's actually a paradox. And, it's also one problem that science cannot solve given its basic assumptions: it assumes a deterministic system - it looks for causes, but freewill commands nihilism, absence, lack... however, it doesn't show us how or by which means this postulate is correct. If Science were to be used, the proof would by necessity cyclical: science assumes the existence of causes.


It's not in favor of anything, actually. All it does is showing that the real nonsense is to deny the entire problem the question posits.

Please check my English answers 10 points?

1. In “My Father Sits in the Dark,” the narrator associates darkness with a fear of the unknown. With what does his father associate darkness, however?
C

2. How do the authors of the two memoir essays on language provide support for their ideas about language?
B

3. Which statement would author Richard Rodriguez most likely support?
C

4. Of what is the egg a symbol in “The Egg”?
C

5. Who is the main audience of the two memoir essays about language?
C

6. Why is Rodriguez unable to hear the distinct sounds of English anymore?
B

7. The speakers in “Hunger of Memory” and “The Egg” are similar in that both
C

8. Although both are busy mothers, the mother in “Daystar” is thinking about some time to herself while the mother in “I Stand Here Ironing” is
C

9. The religious imagery in “My Father in the Navy"
B

10. In “Daystar,” the poet repeats the word nothing in the final lines in order to
A ( My Guess)


My Unit Test.. are you in K12?

How do writers avoid plot armour for their main characters?

Plot Armour appears when a character survives a situation that may otherwise appear fatal for the express purpose of keeping the story going. It often appears when the reader’s suspension of disbelief is stretched to its limit, where the implausible odds of survival are unexplained. Most commonly this can manifest as otherwise normal people having extraordinary amounts of luck, surviving blows that would cripple or kill anyone else or watching dangerous opponents suddenly become completely useless combatants in their vicinity.In principle the solution is easy: Show damage. In Die Hard, hero cop John McClaine is thrown into into situations not unfamiliar to most 1980s action heroes, but unlike his contemporaries he usually comes out of the other end burnt, bruised, bloody, exhausted and scarred.A reader’s imagination will give some leeway to what a character can survive, it’s a requirement for immersive storytelling and adrenaline is a surprisingly powerful plainkiller. But there’s only so much punishment a reader can imagine before things start getting properly implausible.Other stories go further, Game of Thrones set the world on fire by showing that no plot armour is going to save anyone. If you do something stupid or find yourself out of your depth, you die. Time and again characters built up to bey key supports or primary protagonists slip up and die. Those who don’t suffer life-changing injuries.That’s the key word here: They change. None of us go though life unscarred, so why would characters in a convincing story?

Who is the static character from twilight the book? and if so what are quotes give proof and why?

Your mom

What are command line arguments?

Command line argument is used to pass the values to the main() function of any program.By command line argument we are actually passing values to our C program when they are executed.Command line arguments are handled by main function. It means the arugument we are pasing( in form of command line argument) are being passed to main function as an argument.There are two terms related to command line argument , one is argc and other is argv[].argc is a variable of integer type , which will hold the number of arguments passed , and argv[] is a pointer to a character array which will hold the arguments passed to the program.#include
int main(int argc, char * argv[])
{
printf("Number of arguments passed=%d\n",argc);
for(int i =0;i < argc; i++){
printf("argumnet[%d]=%s\n",i,argv[i]);
}
retutn 0;
}
suppose we are running this code (in Linux) as follows../a.out arg1 arg2 5Here we are providing 3 arguments as command line argument namely - 1. arg1 2. arg2 and 3. 5But in the above code as we are printing the number of arguments (line -4) it will print 4 instead of 3 . Here the 1st argument is the code used to run our program ,i.e- ./a.out and it will be stored in argv[0], so the arguments proved by us will be from argv[1].But one think should always be kept in mind that the arguments we are providing will be a string of characters. If we need to use these values in other data types we need to convert it first. Here the 3 rd argument provided by us i.e 5, if we need to use 5 as integer then we first need to convert this from string to integer .The output of our program will be-Number of arguments passes=4argument[0]=.\a.outargumen[1]=arg1argument[2]=arg2argument[3]=5I hope this will help.

TRENDING NEWS