Do you believe women in history and today are treated worse than animals?
There have been times in human history when women were indeed treated very badly and denied basic rights, but to say that they are treated worse than animals shocks me as highly inaccurate. In the modern western world, a place generally considered to be much more civilized then most ancient people groups, we treat animals far worse then I believe any large body of people have ever treated women. For example, we keep thousands of farm animals in small, dark, crowded spaces (battery farming) all their lives and then eat them without second thought. Your example of Muslims being forced to weak hi-jabs (which are normally worn voluntarily btw) seems extremely mild when you consider that even pets are only fed the least valuable scraps of our farm produce, whereas virtually every wealth nation on this planet gives benefits to the unemployed and sick, allowing them to a much higher standard of living then your average animal. When was the last time you saw a woman eating from a can of dog food? Another horror against animals is deforestation, where all kinds of animals are loosing there habitat and certainly their lives in the name of economic growth (which will slightly increase the standard of living for men as well as women). Could you imagine anyone destroying a woman's home and in the process killing her purely for use of the bricks used to build it?
Why do people keep saying leo women are manly?
I dont understand, i have never ever met a manly leo woman, my best friend is so feminine, she keeps attracting very masculine men that she deserves. she is nurturing and cares for every living being. A dating site, called the feminine woman, is ruled by a a very feminine leo woman, she is married with 2 children. Plus, in vedic they are cancers, not leos. and how can you be sure which one is true?
What do I do when a girl rejects a kiss?
This is going to be deep so stay with me.There are two types of resistances that a woman offers:TOKEN RESISTANCE:Now this is not actually any kind of resistance. I am a dating coach and in female psychology, it is mentioned that women are emotional creatures while men are logical ones.While kissing a girl always remember:NEVER ASK IF YOU MAY KISS HER.It's really embarrassing for women. Even if they want to kiss you, there will be hesitation because they don't want to come off as a slut by saying yes.So, don't be a permission seeker. It's a turn off for women.Sometimes, just to test you, she will reject your kiss to observe how you will react.If you lose your head at that moment and became apologetic, she will come to know that she did right by not kissing you because in reality you are a reactive guy which is a loser behaviour.Be responsive, not reactive.2) ACTUAL RESISTANCE:Here a woman is not teasing you by rejecting your kiss. Actual resistance is when she really don't want to be intimate with you.Step back at this moment.Show some empathy.Change the topic.Sometimes women feel that they are being used just for sexual pleasure and it's fine, women love sex more than men and it's a psychological fact.But as a man, always learn when to step back.SOLUTION:Stand close to her.Have a deep and relaxed eye contact.Go close to her and cover 80% of the distance and let her invest 20% of distance.If she comes in 20% of distance then the kiss happens.If she takes her face away then it's not a rejection but shyness. Start kissing her neck. Neck is very sensitive and she will feel vibrations in her body.She will herself turn towards you and start kissing.If she is saying a no firmly then step back, show empathy and change the topic.To know more about how to get sexual, subscribe to my YouTube channel.The Yadhuvir
Do women really care about how much money a guy makes or are they looking for stability?
Yes, but not in ways you would expect all the time.When I was very young, I used to think it's BS that women look for rich guys till I spoke to a girl who said to me, "I didn't think ____ was attractive till I saw what car he drove. All of a sudden he looked sooo good to me." I almost started laughing like it was supposed to be shared absurd joke, but then I realized she was serious. And she was speaking to me like I would understand. Because the percentage of other women who 'understand' is so high, as I've learned over the years. Since then I've seen women who:Marry exclusively for money while being rather honest that they don't particularly care for the guy (sometimes, even to the guy himself).Marry for money, while outright not liking the guy and being miserable in every aspect but living standards.Pick out the richer guys of the lot when looking for men to date.Operate exclusively on the 'Someone's got to be with the rich guy, why not me' principle.Marry men they love, but wish (just a little) that they made more money.Marry for love, but end up outright resentful that he doesn't make as much money as other men they may know (regardless of what they themselves bring in).So in short, women care. Apparently, they care a lot.This is not to say that it doesn't vary from woman to woman. I know plenty of women who are also happy to be with the men they love through the ups and downs. When I got married, my husband had a very low paying job as a corporal in the USMC, and had no savings. I paid for the entire wedding, our first car and apartment. But yet, I knew his poverty was more age related than ability related. He was 21- a very intelligent, ambitious, hard working and focused one. So I can't say with absolute surety that I would have picked him had he not had those traits. Sometimes it's not directly about being rich. It's about having the qualities that will make you rich.Over the years, we have gone from me being the primary earner to him taking that responsibility on. He went on to become a trader, set up his own firm, nearly sank in the crash of 2008, lost his company for other reasons, and is now rebuilding again. He wasn't rich for the whole ride. But he was all those other things consistently. Women care sometimes because they want smooth sailing. Plenty of other times they care because the traits that make you successful (and often rich) are very desirable traits.
Recently, a woman who had an affair was mutilated by her husband's brother with a broken bottle?
Under his brother's instruction, he drugged her and tied her up in the cellar. Once she woke up - the brother got a smashed bottle and rammed it into her vagina and twisted it around, shredding her inside to ensure she could never have a sex life. How many male talk-show hosts can we expect to openly laugh and joke about this scenario? How many male members of the audience will scream with laughter at the jokes directed at this woman's expense? How many male members of the media will openly refer to this as 'simply fabulous'? And how many male talk-show hosts will blame her for it and suggest getting a dog to lick up the blood stains while another suggests doing so would be unpleasant... for the dog. Would this be considered as misogyny IF it were to occur? Would feminists, who claim to seek equality, be offended and speak out against it? Would the male hosts be forced to apologise, laughing as they did so - or would they get sacked? And given the above IMAGINARY scenario vs the reality of the Catherine Kuie Becker case (in which she drugged, tortured, mutilated and performed a home-penoctomy against her husband for the crime of wanting a divorce) - I'll ask again... How can feminists deny misandry exists when the media AND public reactions to two 'similar' instances are completely polar opposite?