What WR do the Philadelphia Eagles have the best chance of getting?
Both Roy Williams and Chad Johnson are possibilities, if the Eagles are willing to part with their 2009 first round pick, or trade some other player of high profile. Chad Johnson seems to want out of Cincinnati. And the Detroit seems to want to leave behind the four wide receiver sets of the Mike Martz (offensive coordinator) era to run the ball more, which leaves them having a lot more wide receivers than they need, while still being weak on the offensive line, and in the defensive secondary. Both trades seem to make sense if the Eagles are willing to pay a high enough price to get these premium players. Another option that they might consider too is trading with the Atlanta Falcons for Roddy White, who is a lesser known wide receiver, but is probably as good as Roy Williams or Chad Johnson. He's just a younger player and has suffered from poor quarterback play, during his short career. He had 1,200 yards and six or seven touchdowns last year, catching passes from Joey Harrington and Chris Redman. If McNabb could stay healthy, I bet White would gain 1,500 yards and catch ten or twelve touchdowns. Other riskier options might be former Bengal Chris Henry, who is highly productive when he's eligible to play. Unfortunately during his three year career, he's shown criminal tendencies and been suspended half of the time to the point that the Bengals finally cut him. But talent-wise, he's probably one of the top 5 or 7 receivers in the league. Another riskier option might be former Jacksonville first round pick Matt Jones, who was recently busted for cocaine. If he gets his head on straight, Jones has the huge size for a wide receiver and the athletic ability to be another T.O. or Braylon Edwards, a very dominant wide receiver.
Should I trade Drew Brees for Matt Forte?
Here's my team: D. Brees J. Cutler F. Gore E. Graham R. Wayne D. Bowe K. Walter J. Galloway C. Cooley R. Lindell Dallas D I don't really need another running back, but is this deal too good to pass up?
What are the best features for social trading network?
Mirror trading automates investments, reduces effort without eliminating responsibilitySocial trading is the latest buzzword on investors lips and is considered as a welcome alternative to traditional banking, which is often associated with high costs and a lack of transparency.The numbers of social trading platforms are continuing to grow and now classic brokers are increasingly integrating communities, discussion forums, or allowing mirror trading within their own trading platforms.While discussion forums and communities facilitate the exchange of information, the exclusive publication of trading signals still disadvantages the trader due in part to time delays from executing on the trade.Mirror trading overcomes that by running highly complex processes in the background so it’s displayed in a simple manner for the user. Trading activities are executed automatically in real time on users’ accounts. In this way, every single trade is actually reproduced and the real-time execution on the account holder or signal receiver’s account is the identical execution price as the signal providers.Some providers, such as the German social trading platform Ayondo, go so far in that trades will even be reproduced and executed proportionally onto users’ accounts regardless of the account size. The performance of signal provider and signal receiver corresponds exactly.Even with trader’s activities being directly executed onto user’s accounts, the monitoring of selected traders and their strategies is an important task that lies in the hands of the user. It is possible to participate with reduced time consumption and less analytically intensive investment; however the responsibility still lies with the user.For this reason, features such as the transparent presentation of strategy providers and traders are of particular importance. All trading activities should be seamlessly tracked and costs openly displayed. Settings for adjusting risk should be possible. Ideally, the provider should support the selection of the signal provider through extensive filtering options.Social trading cannot escape the trend towards mobile platforms. As more providers now have mobile websites or apps on offer, users can track the developments of their investments from anywhere and can make suitable adjustments if required. This mirrors the spirit of self-imposed transparency and openness of social trading as a growing trend that will gain even more importance in the future.
Trade a WR1 for an RB1?
In a 1 for 1 trade, ppr, what caliber receiver would be a fair trade for Arian Foster? My team is WR rich and RB poor, I want to trade with a guy that has depth at RB but crap for WR. I was thinking Maclin. Does that sound about right?
Do you think this is a good trade?
Kind of a tough call, on paper it looks like a great trade for you, but Sprohles has been a beast thus far and Forte has been a joke. How bad do you need WR's is a question I would ask.
How is this trade?
Who do you think I can get for Joey Galloway and Tony Gonzalalez? I want to get a #1 fantasy WR and a decent TE. Also, I want to trade Ronnie Brown. I am in a 12-team league and I am currently 2-0, scoring 250 that past two weeks. My team: Palmer, Leinart Tomlinson, Brown, Barber, Ahman Green Wayne, Boldin, Galloway, Jennings Tony Gonzo Gostkowski Patriots DST, 49ers DST
Is IML a good platform for forex trading?
I will answer this question without any bias or emotion. I will simply state facts. IML is a multilevel marketing company meaning they help you make money from recruiting people and in return they receive most of the profits off of the people you recruit while you receive the remaining portion (There is a comp sheet) . They have several products like an auto trader and a harmonic pattern software that supposedly help traders make trading decisions. Though they do work, I dont find Harmonic Patterns effective, at least not on there own. I highly recommend you learn forex and trade via a broker because IML is a MLM. For this reason, they will always receive most of the profits. For example if you make 60k from recruiting people they probably made double or triple of off the same people you brung in!
Would you make the trade.?
You upgrade a weakness by getting the best WR in the deal (Fitzgerald) and deal away a surplus commodity (Williams, another RB) to further upgrade your backup WRs to play (Evans) and get another RB with good upside playing on a possible championship offense (Jones in Dallas), *however*, I would recommend you change the deal to Roy Williams, DeAngelo Williams, and Ricky Williams for Fitzgerald and Evans. Obtaining Fitz & Evans seems like a smart move for you, but I don't agree that Berrian will be worth anything to your team, and I think it's possible to get a deal done for these players without trading away Ocho Psycho
Does knowledge of economics help in investing?
An economic way of thinking -- understanding opportunity costs, thinking on the margin, seeing the unseen, etc. -- can certainly help you with investing, just as it can help you with building a house, writing poetry, or making a damn good dinner.But a theoretical grasp of economics probably won't help you with value investing or day trading (assuming that's what you mean when you say investing) as much as actually going out there and working with businesses, getting a good grasp of accounting, tax law, and business math will help you.Theoretical economics is largely rooted in mathematical models that assume-away many of the contexts in which real people make real decisions. So if you mean a majors-level understanding of Econ making you a better investor, then, no, if anything, I would wager it would make you a worse investor.I'll use a case example:FA HayekThis is Hayek shaking his head at the idea that economics makes you a better investor.FA Hayek (Friedrich Hayek) was arguably one of the most eminent economic thinkers of the 20th century. Although he was overshadowed by his colleague John Maynard Keynes during WWII and the Great Depression, Hayek went on to win a Nobel prize in economics in 1974 for his work on the business cycle.I like to think that this is what the Nobel-winning commentary was like.Do you know what Hayek did with the money the Nobel Prize committee gave him?He invested in the stock market.Do you know what happened to that money that Hayek invested in the stock market?He lost all of it.If a Nobel Laureate economist lost his money in the stock market, then a strong knowledge of theoretical economics probably isn't specifically helpful for investing in the stock market.Now, this of course does not mean that you shouldn't learn about economics -- it's probably one of the most useful disciplines you can study. I use it daily. Just don't think it will make you a stock market whiz.If you're interested in learning more about economics, I recommend starting with Economics In One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt.