When do you get arrested for prostitution?
You can give all of the free sex you want to someone as long as you and them are of legal age of course. It's prostitution when you must pay a fee in exchange for the sex. So once a prostitute says "for 30 minutes it'll be $20.00" to an undercover cop, she is now guilty of soliciting prostitution & goes to jail for the night. And it doesn't matter when money exchanges hands- if you charge a fee to have sex with someone you are guilty of prostitution.
A riddle... how did they know who to arrest?
well you put " and to arrest HIM for murder" the word fireMAN has the man in it so. the fireman is a guy. well maybe everyone else was a female because fireman is the only hint we have to know that the fireman is a man. and if they went straight for the fireman, then the rest must be females. am i right??
What do cops say when they arrest someone?
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to you by the state. These are called the Miranda rights. Kidnappers want unmarked bills because it is a commonly used procedure for police to "mark" ransom money so that they can track where the kidnappers are spending it after the ransom deal is over. To get a medal of honor, you must not only be a citizen, but also actively enrolled in the military, and involved in combat. I don't know about the maximum amount of medals anyone can receive.
What can I do in the U.S. that would get me arrested in the UK?
As someone who has lived in both countries would really only say carry a gun, or use a gun like for protection for example with the UK having strict gun laws, did read elsewhere someone mention eating a swan didn’t bother using that as the US has rules as well when it comes to protected animals like the bold eagle for example. Hunting in the UK is also alot stricter than the US.However if it was the other way round, few things you can do in the UK that would get you arrested in the US, jaywalking, drinking in parks threatening to kill the PM for example.
If a policeman DOES NOT READ YOUR RIGHTS TO YOU while being arrested, what can be done, is our rights violated?
The only time a police officer would need to read you your rights is if, after arresting you, he asked you questions about the crime that would incriminate you. A police officer does not have to read you your rights if you are not in custody/detained. If you are not read your rights and you volunteer information, without being questioned, it is admissible in court. The ONLY leg you would have to stand on is if the officer asked you questions, after being arrested about the crime (I am not talking about questions like, "What is your name and address"), and tries to use it in court. Even if this happens, the officer may still have enough evidence, even without your statement, to get a conviction. You do not have to be read your rights, just because you are under arrest.
What do american police say when the arrest someone?
It's been said a hundred times, but this might give a little more insight: "You are under arrest." is a phrase that US police may use when they are taking custody of a person whom they have probable cause to believe has committed a crime. The Miranda rights actually stem from Miranda v. Arizona (case law) in which an offender was not given his rights during questioning. The Supreme court ruled that all individuals that are going to be asked ACCUSATORY questions must be "Mirandized". For instance: if you ask someone, "Who drove that stolen car?" it is not an accusatory question, but if you ask someone, "Did you drive that stolen car?" then you have accused them of posession of stolen property (MV). This kind of question would require miranda rights to be read. Very simply, our supreme court has not placed any meaning on words when adopting policies of arrest. The ruling says that anytime an individual submits to your authority you have detained them, which in all actuality amounts to an arrest. So...."STOP! POLICE!" is very much the same as "You are under arrest." No one listens to either......
What is the saddest you've felt about arresting someone?
Idiotic Liberal Domestic Violence Laws Sorry I can’t write this without my anger showing.Stupid liberal California mandated arrests in all domestic violence cases, and while the District Attorney said to only arrest the most physically dangerous one, that was obviously a code phrase for arrest the man not the woman. Most officers refused to do that and would arrest both if they could not tell who started the fight. (The correct option of arresting neither had been taken away,) This meant also taking the children and placing them in foster homes unless an adult agreeable to both parents could be quickly found to care for them..In California if I slap a stranger on the street that’s a misdemeanor battery (242 PC). If I identically slap anyone with whom I was having or once had a romantic relationship that was a felony (273.5PC) In other words they even created a fake felony to make this insanity “work.”It was pure madness especially dragging the screaming children out of their own home.I don’t believe in and never tolerated domestic violence but this ABSOLUTELY NOT the answer. The moronic idea came from a San Francisco City Ordinance, what a surprise.Would loved to have filmed a video of a uniformed police officer physically dragging a hysterical 7 year old out of her house because both her parents were under arrest.Hope the liberal scum who think the government is the answer to everything is happy, because this is an absolute mess.What’s really sad is that the courts upheld the nonsense of the legislature making fake felonies to achieve political goals. (Whether a crime is a felony or misdemeanor is supposed to depend on how serious the crime is, not some unrelated detail).
Why is the USA concerned with arresting the officials at FIFA? Why does FBI need get involved with the prosecution of FIFA officials?
At the end of the day the United States needed to step in. First, lets clear some of the misconceptions that American and non-American people have pertaining to America and football (Soccer) in the United States. As others and the OP stated yes Americans aren't particularly fond of soccer (for the most part). However, this is not true when the World Cup is involved. Americans travel more for this event and buy for trinkets and gadgets pertaining to World Cup soccer than any-other nation. So, this might not translate into caring about soccer like we do with football and baseball but it is a start.Ever since 1994 the United States qualified to compete in the World Cup. The national team's ranking has also been improving. Between the years of 1993 to 1996 the Major League Soccer (MLS) had been formed as a major league sport being part of the CONCACAF. Ever since then the sport has expanded.Soccer has recently been one of the top choices (maybe the most played) out of all the little league sports (before 12 or 13 something like that). We will also have to take in account that the United States has been getting an influx of Hispanic immigrants who tend to love soccer. ESPN had recently purchased the rights to many soccer games including top European leagues, friendly matches, and the World Cup. The ratings to these these matches.Soccer might not be the most popular in the United States and until there are economic shifts soccer will not be as popular as football, basketball, and baseball.FIFA did a disservice to the United States and the world by not awarding the United States the World Cup in 2022. There are economic interests that the U.S. has because there is a market for the World Cup. Unlike the majority of other nations of the world the United States has the infrastructure, resources, and capital to manage the World Cup or the Olympics. The United States has a reason to go after a corrupt institution such as FIFA and the crimes allegedly happened within the territory of the United States. So, why not?
Was this case just a man defending his daughter from a predator or murder? If you were on the jury faced with only the facts alleged would you convict?
So all QT locations have the same layout and are labeled a “safe place”. They have very good quality full video and audio recording of all their properties. They usually have police in the store or parking lots. They all have security guards that are usually off duty police officers. QuikTrip is unusual for having high standards for their employees and paying them well. QT's don't get robbed or let customers cause drama, they are known for keeping their stores clean and comfortable for their paying customers. They are the only gas stations that you know for sure will have a clean restroom.Yes the father and the girls were in an area that is known for crime and it was late at night. Even so it's weird that the “victim” was panhandling in the parking lot. QT restrooms are separate men/women inside the store, you walk past the registers to get to. Very strange that he was even able to get into the ladies room without an employee stopping him. He had to walk past the mens room to get to it. The ladies room would have 2 stalls (one handicapped/changing station). And the girls friends were in there with her. He would have been trying to get in the stall in a cramped crowded space.It sounds like when the employees were told (don't know how they didn't see it happen) they alerted store security (don't see how he missed this either). All they did was ask him to leave the property.I understand the fathers anger. His daughter was nearly assaulted and the store didn't do anything. But that is where my sympathy ends. If he felt not enough was done the onus was on him to call the police at that point. Who is going to be his daughters protector now?I don't think the father intentionally killed the other man. But he did physically attack him causing his death. It sounds like no one handled the situation the way they were supposed to.Here is a link to a news story that contains the police reportPD: Phoenix father fatally beats man who tried to enter daughter's bathroom stall
Should Police Be Arresting People For Asking For Directions?
California Officers Save Family From Burning Van! SANTA CRUZ, Calif. — On Feb. 2 shortly after 7 p.m., an ex-convict in a stolen sport-utility vehicle plowed head-on into a van carrying two adults and two young children. The SUV caught fire, with flames shooting 30 feet into the air. The family was trapped, and the van appeared about to explode with them inside. Instead, two Santa Cruz police officers and a sheriff's deputy who had been chasing the parolee broke into the smoky vehicle and pulled the Santa Cruz family to safety, seconds before the van turned into a fireball. On Wednesday, the Santa Cruz Police Department honored officer Carter Jones and reserve officer Scott Christie with Life Saving Awards for their quick action and extraordinary bravery. But don't try to call them heroes. "I did what every officer in this department would have done," said Christie, 44, who is the department's only reserve officer. "He doesn't even get paid to do what he does, but he's done it for nine years," Police Chief Howard Skerry said. Christie said he's a full-time insurance agent in Soquel and works as a cop for free about 40 hours a month simply because he loves police work. He lives about a half-mile from the crash site on Old San Jose Road. Christie said he knew the van could explode but didn't give it a second thought. "All I knew was a family was in there with young kids," he said. "It had to be done." When the officers approached the smoky van with tinted windows, they could hear the children crying hysterically and people trying to break the windows. After sheriff's deputy Stefan Fish broke the van's back window and Christie scooped out the glass with his hands, Christie saw the two children: a 5-year-old boy and a 7-year-old girl. With her long, wavy hair, the girl immediately reminded Christie of his 7-year-old daughter. Christie, a father of four, pulled the girl and her brother out of the window and carried them to safety, while Fish and Jones pulled the parents out a front door. "Every day you come to work and don't know what will happen," said Jones, 28, a Santa Cruz native who has been with the force four years. "That's why we all love the job so much." Jones said he was so high on adrenaline that he didn't give the danger a thought. But when the van blew up, he realized that he — and six other people — could have died.