How were humans (animals) made according to the Big Bang theory?
The big bang theory is not a creation tale. It deals with the expansion of space. It does not state how any life was created, nor does it attempt to. Also the big bang was NOT an explosion. Many people believe that. But only because they've been getting their information on what the big bang theory says happened from people who don't know what they're talking about. It's hardly an issue of "NASA you're retarded" regardless. NASA is a research organization that primarily deals with building and launching spacecraft. NASA has absolutely nothing to do with the big bang theory. Unlike say, Einstein's theories of relativity there was no single author of the big bang theory. It's a complex theory that evolved over time as various observations were made. Most of this took place in the EARLY 1900's. Before NASA even existed. If you can believe that a "powerful being" created it all then you have no reason not to believe the big bang theory. Way back in the 1980's the Catholic Church stated that the big bang theory was accurate and in accordance with the Bible. In fact one of the early scientists involved in creating the theory was a Catholic priest, Georges Lemaitre, in the 1920's. Of course when the Catholic Church made their decision in the 1980's they researched what the big bang theory ACTUALLY says and not just rumors about it spread by people who don't know anything about it. And yes, we ARE still evolving. Evolution is a well proven fact. However we are big complex organisms with long life spans. Evolution is a slow process, especially in those cases. You know that a single organism doesn't evolve right? Traits are passed down to an organism's offspring, then to that organism's offspring, and so on. Eventually these traits may result in different characteristics. That's all evolution is. In something like insects and smaller animals where an organism is born and within a few days or even a few months it is having its own offspring these traits manifest themselves quickly. But in humans it's usually AT LEAST 15-20 years before a human reproduces. And in develeoped countries that number is up in the high 20's and low 30's. That makes our evolution a slower process. But it is still happening, every time a child is born.
Why do bigger animals live longer?
A2A:They don’t. The answer is complicated. Mostly bigger animals(biological animals) live longer than shorter ones but there are glaring exceptions. Aldabra giant tortoise - Wikipedia live way longer than many or it’s larger and heavier species including humans. Turritopsis dohrnii - Wikipedia is immortal, though it is much smaller than humans and whales. The reason larger animals seemed to live longer was the basis of Rate-of-living theory - Wikipedia which was based on the fact that smaller animals have higher basal metabolism and as described in Kleiber's law - Wikipedia. The mechanistic reason behind formed the famous free radical theory of ageing(Free-radical theory of aging - Wikipedia).What it states is that the process of metabolism produces harmful free radicals which accumulate and slowly over time destroy the cells leading to the process of ageing. So higher the metabolism, higher free radicals production and accelarated the process of ageing.The reason Kleiber’s law is not regarded as law per se, is because of the large number of exceptions found. A rhesus monkey(Rhesus macaque - Wikipedia) can outlive a buffalo by almost twice it’s lifespan. Many scientists when reevaluated the data using modern sophisticated data analytics and statistical tools, found that relationship between size and longetivity fails in many cases.Read this fantastic comparison using modern tools An Analysis of the Relationship Between Metabolism, Developmental Schedules, and Longevity Using Phylogenetic Independent Contrasts.
How do dinosaurs become fossils according to the theory of evolution?
According to Ian Juby, founder of the International Creation Science Special Interest Group for Mensa members, http://www.icssig.org and a sustaining member of the Creation Research Society: http://creationresearch.org Even the evolutionists have acknowledged that fossilization must happen rapidly - and can happen in hours. They also acknowledge that to make a fossil, the organism has to be buried rapidly. Now they would claim a local flood or sandstorm, but when you look at these fossil beds, they literally cover large portions of entire continents, and can be found on multiple continents - evidence that it certainly was no "local flood."
In theory, how large could insects grow?
There are 3 major challenges which insects that have decided to grow large have to face:Breathing - Insects breath through diffusion of air through openings in their body walls called spiracle. This implies that insects can only get as much oxygen as is possible for diffusion to give to them. As stated by Jonathan Lyons , this is a major factor in the evolution of large insects during the carboniferous period.Blood Circulation - Insects have an open blood circulatory system which means that insect blood makes direct contact with organs and are not bound to blood vessels like that of other animals. This can quickly become a problem when the insect gets bigger than a certain upper limit as gravity can act on the blood (hemolymph) and pull it down. Armour (That's right, its an armour) - Insect exoskeleton will tend to become quick heavy as they get bigger. Carrying huge and rigid exoskeleton can greatly impede locomotion and worse, can crush its carrier. Imagine an ant the size of a horse, this insect will not be able to carry its exoskeleton.Exactly what size insect can get may depend on some of the behaviors of each insectCrawling insects probably have more chances of growing bigger that flying insectsAlso, fast insects like Ants need to be lighter that slow-moving ones like Dung beetle.I know I did not answer your question directly, but here are my thoughts on the subject.