What does this question means? Can you explain/rephrase it please?
I believe you'd have better luck posting this in the science/mathematics category. Sorry I can't help.
Can you rephrase this question for me please?
Your ordinary theory is sound, and needs in basic terms a splash of tinkering to male it truly stable. I have no theory why human beings forget approximately bearing directly to the quest for the final be conscious and punctuation and picture that the respond is including greater punctuation and pointless words. enable's decelerate and seem. in case you desire to maintain all of it one sentence, the right punctuation after "particular" is a colon. Any time you quantity the climate to maintain on with, a catalogue will become formal and demands a colon. yet why "for," besides? a element is the two particular or it truly is not. And a era or "complete end" makes for an prolonged pause, a ideal putting of the scene and makes use of the rhythm on your desire. "among the darkness" in basic terms is senseless. "Darkness" is singular, and not something could be "among" a single element. And enable's get poor Jake removed from the dramatic risk of the eyes and placed him interior the area of judgment, the form of element that human beings do. enable's make the eyes and the darkness the concentration of this passage, which potential putting apart them and helpful even choosing an ominous adjective, because of the fact we've the emotional scope and actual area for it. enable's make the darkness right into a element it extremely is shifting in on him and unsafe him. And enable's advise that this organization has been construction for it sluggish, with a single be conscious. do this: "And yet Jake could no longer shake the sensation that unseen piercing eyes have been gazing him from the encroaching darkness. His campfire and rifle unexpectedly appeared pitiful and ineffective because of the fact the dark and the eyes crept closer interior the suffocating jungle evening. unexpectedly the tent and the others appeared very far away." Fewer words and maximum of them attraction to the 5 senses. it extremely is the thank you to scare hell out of people.
How else could I rephrase this question?
For extra useful English the two ruin it up into numerous sentences or upload extra 'because of fact's because of fact the three clauses are actually not parallel. "Pit bulls should not be banned because of fact they are actually not inherently cruel, because of fact banning a breed is idiotic, and because they're in simple terms as beautiful as the different dogs." "Pit bulls should not be banned. they are actually not inherently cruel. Banning a breed is idiotic. they're in simple terms as beautiful as the different dogs."
I always try to bring up something related to the question I want to ask in relation to my life, and then it is a lot easier to casually ask them your question when they already know your answer.Examples: So last year I went and visited my sister for Thanksgiving in California, and it was a ton of fun. Do you have any brothers or sisters?My work gives us very generous time off, and I decided when I started that I wanted to try to use it for traveling. It is my goal to go to a new place every year. Do you like to travel?These are just two examples. Most times people will feel more comfortable answering a question if they know how you feel about it. "Do you like action movies?" "...yes" "Ah, I hate them." no one likes to be in these situations. If you preempt with your answer then even if they disagree, they will see that you are open with how you feel.Hope this helps!
How can I rephrase this and make it better ?
I'm sorry, but it doesn't make any sense to me that after everything I have done for you, you can't even take a minute of your time to talk to me, or even say a simple thank you.
How would you rephrase this sentence to make it sound more natural?Didn't you have some friends back in the place you came from?Since there’s no information about what is meant by “the place you came from,” the simplest way to phrase this question is as follows:Didn’t you have some friends where you used to live?Did you have friends where you used to live?
Following is one of the many was the lines can be paraphrased. You can choose to write in your own way too. The situation looks like one in the warzone. Sergeant Price is there with his soldiers. Commander is a high rank officer inquiring from the sergeant about the men. ‘Commander called Sergeant Price over a secure channel to inquire about the soldiers with him if they are alive or not. ‘Get me over with John Reed’ he ordered the Sergeant upon getting to know about their well-being.’ Visit the following website to take any type of online paraphrasing services. http://www.onlinerephrasing.com/...
“Not sincere/not neutral” is another way of saying “This looks like a rhetorical question”, that is, a question where the author pre-supposes an answer.I think this phrase in the details: “You can't say it's to respect free will because I wasn't acting out of free will- I was acting out of instinct.” has tickled someone’s spidey-senses because it appears to assume that you already know an answer; you have already pointed people answering in a particular direction you want the answer to fall. You have already offered an ?explanation ?excuse ?denial.It looks like you are directing an answer. It looks like you have an opinion on the ‘correct’ answer and are not open to others’ understanding.This might not be your intention, and it might not even be a correct call, but this might be what caught someone’s eye.So; how to avoid this in future?Make the question simpler. Rephrase it into asking for the answer you seek, not the answer you want. Dump some of the detail; the detail is about you, not the problem.Would these work for you?“How can I encourage others to confront me with my transgressions?” or“What can I do to open myself to learning more about my spiritual weaknesses?” or“Focussing on my errors, how can I encourage people to help me be a better [your noun here]?”Do you see what I mean?If you edit the question, the tag will probably be removed automatically.
How can I rephrase this sentence?
I think I know what you mean you're not far off .Try this, hope it helps! A sound, coming from the right,drew his attention. Note that reading the sentance with out the part in parentheses is still a complete sentence. There's a rule for that, but I've been out of school to remember it, I just know that's how you handle it. Good Luck, Dave
Contra another answer, the "chattering" is fine. The "-" is a bit odd because it's normally used to make a sentence out of pieces that aren't grammatically connected, but here it cuts a sentence which is perfectly grammatical without it into ungrammatical fragments. I suggest replacing it with a comma.But the main problem is that "warmed in" leads the reader to expect "warmed in the fire" or the like, so that "warmed in the cold winter of 2013" is mirth-provoking. Unfortunately it's hard to suggest how to repair it without more context.