What is the best option for a Mechanical Engineer after a Bachelor’s in Engineering?
There are so many things you can do.But I will tell you first what not to do?Don’t do any higher education in India going for M.E/M.Tech or MBA, in India. If you want to take up a job in Industry your post graduation is almost useless 99%. You will regret this after 10 years of experience or more, which I am doing now. As far industry the number of years and the content of your experience and your achievements matter. 5 years down the line after you start work no recruiter will ever enter the educational area of your resume. It all matters only to entry into industry for the chance of campus interview whether you study in IIT or IIM and whether you are graduate/post-graduate. Later no one looks at it.If you are really interested interested in research then take GATE exam and get into premier institutes like IIT / NIT’s and sure pursue your PhD. Then you have to be clear that you are gonna start your career very late from rest of your friends. But MBA is a useless thing to do after engineering. It is a fashionable thing started few years back. But it is a baseless thing to do a technical under graduation and move onto a management career unless you found clearly engineering is not my thing and want to shift your career path from hardcore engineering.What to do?Instead of planning for a job plan for a career. To be very broad no matter what engineering you did two things are gonna rule the world from now.Energy - Alternative fuel sources, Electric carsWater - Water treatment, water structuresThis is gonna change the whole industrial world. Big oil companies are gonna lose their infrastructure and investments overnight which the oil barons are resisting and hiding to figure out how to save their ass.
Child with special needs in my classroom, however parent refuses to realise her child has special needs?
First off, the school I work at is a private English preschool in Japan, so many of the rules that would apply to the US or public insitutions would not pertain here. Our school does not have a main principal or any special institution to deal with problem behavior. I am just wondering if anyone would have a clue as to what problems this boy may have. I have a 4 year old boy in my class of 11 children who from day one has needed lots of care and attention. His parents claim it is because he is "spoiled" at home and not used to a social environment, however I am convinced he has other problems. Some of the problems he has include; Has a hard time speaking his own native language (Japanese/Korean) and only repeats after other children or the teacher most of the time. Not able to follow a routine smoothly after 4 months of being in class. Cannot chew or swallow his food properly and needs constant supervision while eating. Will make himself throw up if put under pressure.
What is the difference between UC and CSU universities in california?
The UCs are the research universities in California. That means that they are better funded, support graduate education, and tend to hire more renowned faculty within their fields. They may have professional schools, such as medical or law schools associated with them. On the negative side, you are more likely to have a lot of your teaching done by graduate student TAs, rather than by the professor him/herself. Your degree from a UC would have more prestige, and especially if you are in the physical sciences, you would have better lab facilities and more opportunities to be involved in research earlier in your education. The CSUs are the teaching institutions in the state. You are more likely to be taught by the professor, but the professor won't have the "name" of the ones at UCs. Faculty at CSUs spend more of their time teaching, and less doing research. The system was originally designed for undergraduates only, but in more recent years has offered master's degrees and is now offering a very few, limited, doctorates in education (as far as I know, there aren't any doctorates in other fields at the CSUs). In general, the CSUs are fine for fields like teaching in which prestige does not play much of a part. If you want to go on to medical school, get a wall street job, or something like that, you would be better off at a UC. The disadvantage is that the UCs are quite a bit more expensive than are the CSUs.
What should we study after hotel management for further growth?
Excellent communication skill is a main part of the hotel industry. By fluent english you can get job more easily because travellers from different countries stays in hotels and you have to communicate with them so its very important to learn english.After this you will be able to get jobs in foreign countries also . You can also learn about the foreign dishes which are very popular.And after having experience in that you can become masters in that.
What do professors generally consider and write in their recommendation letters for their undergraduate students for graduate studies?
I’ve written a few letters for people who took my class, at least two of whom got into the master’s program at Stanford. Usually, I would write aboutWays in which the student went above and beyond. One person found a lot of mistakes in my lecture notes, and I was quick to mention that as an example of her “analytical thinking.” The same person helped a lot of students on Piazza, and I mentioned that as an example of “potential for teaching.”Academic performance. If they were one of the top 5 students in my class, I would mention their class rank. If they had very good homework or exam grades, I would mention that too.Circumstances that make their academic performance more impressive, e.g. “X got near-perfect homework grades and always made time for the class despite working full-time at a demanding startup.”If they came to my office hours a lot (which were early in the week) I would talk about how they were so hardworking that they started all of their problem sets a week in advance.I usually included a brief paragraph about why getting a good grade in my class is a big deal, and implies a certain level of work ethic and analytical thinking.If I really had nothing to say I would look through their homework and exams and talk about their performance on specific problems. “X had a very clear solution to Problem 3 on the exam, which required students to spot an error in a proof, and which most people in the class got a 0 on.”We also had to answer multiple-choice questions ranking the applicant in comparison to their peers. The choices were usually “top 1%,” “top 5%,” “top 10%,” etc. Generally if I was writing a letter for someone they would be at least top 10%.