How can The Prisoner's Dilemma be solved?
It's not a prisoner's dilemma, but The Prisoner's Dilemma, which is a theoretical construct in game theory. As such, it can't be 'solved', it can only be strategized. And because there is no way to understand your opponent's approach in a one-time interaction, the much more interesting problem is the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma, where the game is replayed continuously and you can base your moves on your opponent's.As Wikipedia explains:Strategy for the iterated prisoners' dilemmaInterest in the iterated prisoners' dilemma (IPD) was kindled by Robert Axelrod in his book The Evolution of Cooperation (1984). In it he reports on a tournament he organized of the N step prisoners' dilemma (with N fixed) in which participants have to choose their mutual strategy again and again, and have memory of their previous encounters.Axelrod invited academic colleagues all over the world to devise computer strategies to compete in an IPD tournament. The programs that were entered varied widely in algorithmic complexity, initial hostility, capacity for forgiveness, and so forth.Axelrod discovered that when these encounters were repeated over a long period of time with many players, each with different strategies, greedy strategies tended to do very poorly in the long run while more altruistic strategies did better, as judged purely by self-interest. He used this to show a possible mechanism for the evolution of altruistic behaviour from mechanisms that are initially purely selfish, by natural selection.The winning deterministic strategy was tit for tat, which Anatol Rapoport developed and entered into the tournament. It was the simplest of any program entered, containing only four lines of BASIC, and won the contest. The strategy is simply to cooperate on the first iteration of the game; after that, the player does what his or her opponent did on the previous move.Depending on the situation, a slightly better strategy can be "tit for tat with forgiveness." When the opponent defects, on the next move, the player sometimes cooperates anyway, with a small probability (around 1–5%). This allows for occasional recovery from getting trapped in a cycle of defections. The exact probability depends on the line-up of opponents.
How should I solve this dilemma?
You don't have to single someone out to leave the group. One thing you can try is to write the names of everyone in your class on pieces of paper. Then, take X,Y,and Z and start three different piles with their names. Then, divide up the rest of the names between the piles. After the project is finished, each group should go to your teacher and tell him/her that X,Y, and Z, respective to each group, did no work whatsoever, and ask that they not recurve credit for their work. They will probably hate you for this, but it might just motivate them to actually work, and they will thank you for it in the future.
I have a dilemma to solve it. Pls help me..TQ.?
The situation is one that may be more complex than simply procedure. Often people traveling have specific dietary requirements due to health and or ethnic or religious customs. Assuming you have a policy on travel and reimbursement I would reiterate the policy to the employee and ask if there is any specific reason for not having to eat what is available. This can be directed through HR and or the individuals manager. It is your duty as an employee to bring this forth. The underlying theme is that policy and procedure are required to be followed and there must be a reasonable reason as to why this individual requires special circumstances. Do not assume that the individual is milking the system or just does not follow the procedure for their own benefit. Once the right questions are asked then take the appropriate action.
How can we solve the dilemmas of democracy?
This depends on what you believe the dilemmas of democracy are. If you believe that the biggest dilemma in a democracy is that is that the majority will take away the rights of the minority you might want to transition to a republic. If you believe that democracy is bureaucratic, slow, and that the government should exist just move faster than you will want an authoritarian regime. Monarchism for more right wing people while Fascism and Communism for more left leaning.
How do I solve this dilemma of going to US for my master's for Fall 2019 or choosing to opt for UPSC 2019 Prep as I graduated in 2017 with biology having no idea how to choose?
Firstly accept my apologizes for late reply i was engaged in mains. Now, your question -The only thing that matters is how much you want a thing.A simple trick would be - flip a coin for for the option and while the coin is in the air the option that your soul wants the coin to choose is the best.UPSC is a gamble and so is choosing something that you dont want from with in your heart. this dilemma has to be faced and solved intelligently.If you want to enter the services more than anything then your choice is clear. you ultimately have to see what you want and not weigh the time, pros and cons etc like we usually do.life is short, and if you are not living on the edge then you are taking too much space. You have to take calculated risk to achieve your goals.I myself have no backup, but the one thing that i know is i want to be an IAS and that is enough for me to turn down job offer, you must see for yourself. Hope it helps. i would be happy to help further if you choose to appear for UPSC and i hope that you do. India need its daughters.
What options are there to solve this ethical dilemma?
Brad Shoreman is a drummer in a band based out of Southern Ontario. He asks you to help him with his personal tax return. He believes that any cash “gigs” should not be included in his personal income because they are not traceable and the government gets enough of his money. You like their music and enjoy the free tickets supplied to you. What will you do when he demands that this revenue not be included?
How would you solve the ILLEGAL Immigration dilemma ?
Put into effect an effort to stop providing work for them. There is current legislation that mandates that employers use a ID system that is Fed. Gov. based to confirm the legal status of all they hire. Apparently this system is quite accurate. Sure there will be errors but the security/well being of our nation is at hand. The fence idea based on a WALL kinda thing seems foolish perhaps in a few isolated areas. The idea of techno gadgets that screen and monitor makes more sense to me. The idea of putting Illegals into the army, I don't particularly like. Mainly because you train these people in the use of OUR weapons. I have heard currently of fears that there are actually LARGE numbers of Hispanics (non Americans) in our services now and as they are ranked up, they could be put in a position to create a cue or to turn our army ranks against us. I would prefer to see Illegals put to work in work camps. If you get caught and want to be set free quicker, you work your way out. Building roads etc. IF not, you sit on a bench, drink water and eat bread (not tortillas). No TV, weights etc. This is hard time or work time. Do only a few guys like this and the rest would stop coming.
Help on solving this dilemma please.?
i need to prepare at least three pages based on this topic discussion question. " WHAT ARE SOME OF THE ETHICAL ISSUES IN GIVING CUSTOMERS AN AWARD FOR CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR WITHOUT NOTIFYING THEM FIRST? I need to elaborate a couple of ethical issues and further work on them. this is the topic: " Checkers Pizza was one of the first to offer home delivery service, with overwhelming success. However, the pizza chains soon followed suit,taking away Checker's competitive edge. Jon Barnerd, Checker's founder and co-owner, needed a new gimmick to beat the competition. He decided to develop a computerized information database that would make Checkers the most efficient competitor and provide insight into consumer buying behavior at the same time. Under the system, telephone customers were asked their phone number ; if they had ordered from Checkers before, their address and previous order information came up on the computer screen. After successfully testing the new system , Barnard put computerized order network in place in all. Checkers outlets. After three months of success, he decided to give an award to the family that ate the most Checkers pizza .Through the tracking system, the company identified the biggest customer, who had ordered a pizza every weekday for the past three months (63 pizzas). The company put together a program to surprise the family with an award, free-food certificates, and a news story announcing the award. As Barnard began to plan for the event, however ,he began to think that maybe the family might not want all the attention and publicity."