Are most rapists uncircumcised?
Well, just being logical here - the majority of men in the world are intact ("uncircumcised"), so I guess that yes, the majority of rapists are intact as well. What I think you meant to ask is if there's a higher rate of rapists who are not circumcised....and NO, definitely not, there's no correlation whatsoever. A rapist doesn't care if he hurts a woman! And the reason why he rapes her has nothing to do with how lubricated his penis is. It's about dominance and control.
Did Donald Trump say "they are rapists", or did he say "there are rapists"?
Because the media keeps saying that he said "they are rapists" and because of that, angry Latinos all over the place hate his guts, and some of them want him dead.
I fell in love with my rapist. What should I do?
It’s normal you will experience a whole range of emotions that try to compensate for the abuse you went through. It’s also quite normal you feel sexual confusion, or feelings of love, because your body was sexual with your rapist. In a normal situation these feelings would already be present before the intercourse. But it’s not love exactly, it’s lust, and it’s a destructive kind of lust because you will again be the victim in that situation. But again, it’s not abnormal you experience this.This appeal has been well-documented as one of the results of sexual abuse, and is also one of the reasons why so many victims of rape don’t go to the police. They are trying to convince themselves it’s not that big a deal, or that you were in love so it would have happened anyway, or any other type of “normal dating” that isn’t actually the truth but feels a lot safer and less threatening then the truth: they were raped. By imagining you feel in love with your rapist, you also imagine you’re finding some sort of control over him, or your own past. I’m sorry.I found a lot of support in online and real life support groups. How you feel after the assault, even if it feels positive, is important to be discussed so you’ll find your own identity again. I hope you can find the support you need to handle this.
Why do rapist sympathizers exist?
Here's something you need to reconsider from the movie link, a lot of the times rapists that break into women's houses they don't even know just happen to be attractive, hot successful white males. Usually it's rare that's it's been documented it's mostly black thugs who lives live in poverty or an ugly old man. You're correct on how rape is accepted in African nations, however my question is more of "why are there rapist sympathizers in America?"
Is Kobe Bryant a rapist?
We don't know. All we are aware of is what the evidence that is provided to the public indicates and their [Kobe and the alleged victim] words and statements about their sexual encounter. In this country you are innocent until proven guilty, and since the alleged victim decided not to testify, we have to decide for ourselves. This is what I know: 1. She changed her story three times. 2. Her panties were soiled by another man's sperm, in other words, she slept with someone else before or after she slept with Kobe. 3. She bragged about sleeping with Kobe Bryant to friends at a party. 4. She refused to testify, this was after she changed her story for the last time. 5. Her behavior is not that of a rape victim. If you study rape cases and behavioral patterns of women who were raped, you will see no matching patterns. 6. Her behavior matches well with that of an extortionist. She filed a civil suit and was awarded money. 9 times out of 10, rape victims want to see their rapist rot in prison. She was fine with money. This does not prove that he is innocent but it does support his claim that they had sex, not that he raped her. No one knows but Kobe, the alleged victim, and God. I'll choose to rely on the information that is provided and that tells me that the person who is likely the liar is that girl.... not Kobe.
Should I feel guilty for having homicidal thoughts towards my rapist?
Of course not. Your rapist deserves to die. (Not that I'm advocating the death of rapists - a civilized society balances justice and mercy).
How do Australians feel about the fact that their country was once a prison colony?
I have three direct convict ancestors, one English (transported for highway robbery) and two Irish (incl. a female, both transported for theft). Fifty years ago you would have died if you or someone else had found this out, but some time ago it became a bit chic to have a convict ancestor with a long connection to the country, so I wouldn't think anyone who knew would hide it nowadays. I certainly didn't always know it, it wouldn't be something your grandmother would have told you, its only through family history research that it was revealed (it’s amazing the number of people who find out that their ‘government employee’, ‘civil servant’ or other occupation ancestor was actually a convict).And its surprisingly common - right up until the 1850s most of the European population in Australia was either a convict, a freed convict or the offspring of a convict. About one-fifth of Australians are descendants are convicts - if your family has been here for a while, it’s almost a guarantee you have a convict ancestor. Ex-PMs Howard and Rudd are both of convict descent, as are many other famous Aussies.My general feeling is that most Aussies consider that convicts were transported for what nowadays would be fairly minor offences (mostly against property, with fewer involving persons, almost none for murder), were products of the brutal economic and social system of the time, and that once in Australia they redeemed themselves and made a good go of helping build the country.Two of my ancestors certainly appeared to do so, the other however re-offended (cattle stealing) and eventually was internally transported from NSW to Tasmania where he died while still serving his sentence. Oh well. Nonetheless, I think Australians should be (and generally are ) proud of our humble 'loser' origins.
Can someone tell me the truth about furries?
1. You have to be interested in anthropomorphics to be considered a furry. A. "Attraction" can count as an interest, thus.. finding an anthro character hot could count. B. That's very true.. in that way everyone can be a furry. Although.. if their interest is only in 1 character.. then I'd question how large their dedication would be to anthros in general. 2. It's a "furry" term for sex. 3. Pedos and animal rapists are a minority of society.. furries and non-furries alike. 4. They all do it for different reasons. Some people like feeling of fur against their body, some do it to express themselves, some to promote their own fursuit business and some do it to entertain others. No.. not all furries are into fursuits.. unusually about 10-20% of con-goers have fursuit... although it's not as large in the general population furries.. since it's an investment. 5. Not all, but some would engage in bestiality. Probably about 2%, because generally 2% of most populations engage in bestiality.
How can lawyers justify defending rapists and other criminals?
I'm a criminal defense lawyer. To address your question: 1) there are very few clear cut cases, especially when a woman accuses a man of rape; in most rape cases, the defendant and the alleged victim were engaged in some type of consensual sexual contact when the stories diverge. Often times, both the defendant and the alleged victim have been drinking or doing drugs. When I meet with them for the first time, I have little idea if these clients are telling me the truth -- unless of course they confess to me, but that's yet to happen. If I believe they're innocent or there it falls, as it often does, into the grey area, we try the case before a jury. If it appears there is strong evidence against the client and, therefore, it appears very likely that a jury would find him guilty, I work out a deal with the prosecutor that the judge must approve. Criminal defense lawyers are not vile creatures people have been to led believe we are. In fact, some of the most caring and competent professionals I know are criminal defense lawyers. 2) For the government to successfully put together a case against a criminal defendant, it needs to be represented by a lawyer (the prosecutor) who understands procedure, evidence, and how to assess the merits of a case. If the government is going to be represented by an experienced attorney, would it be fair to deny a criminal defendant -- who cannot learn these rules and procedures overnight -- an experienced lawyer of his own? What if the "victim" is lying or mistaken? Should a defendant who is accused of a serious crime simply be sent to jail or prison without an attorney to listen to him or investigate the merits of the government's case? If a person accused of a heinous crime cannot find an attorney willing to represent him, we should simply empower the police to cart him straight to prison. Does that sound like a good idea?