What are the most realistic changes that Donald Trump will be able to make to ACA?
To be realistic..? I’m not too optimistic on Trump getting too much of what he may want on this. I am sure many are wishing he could, but unless something really spectacular occurs, I do not think he will be able to make any changes he discussed or would like to keep in the ACA.The Republican house and Senate were/are ferocious in killing the ACA completely, and that they will do. The proposed head of Health and Human Services head under Trump, Tom Price, will be the architect of the ACA. I see a real fight here, and not smooth sailing. Here is Price’s proposal just a few years ago and I have a feeling, this will be the basis of the new ACA Text - H.R.2300 - 114th Congress (2015-2016): Empowering Patients First Act of 2015 It sounds good…but has a lot of questions for those with pre-existing conditions, no single payer, no cap on how much a health insurer can charge (any caps? no). If you have insurance, you could keep insurance, but if you’re not covered, getting insurance may be a situation and they can impose a pre existing condition for denial.And I have the biggest question that reminds me of healthcare insurance before the ACA…lifetime health insurance limits under the plan. For those who feel that may not be a problem, I remember not too long ago when health insurance policies had a cash limit, of 1M or 2M over a lifetime. That seemed like a lot until…the cost of healthcare went up, and a few years of preventative care adds up. And so will any accidents. And goodness forbid, any long term health diagnoses for care …for your family. Those insurance cap limits came up real fast in the old days for families. Many people held off on care until it was too late. Under the ACA, there wasn’t any cap for individuals/families. I hope this is addressed, I hope Trump can realistically deal with it, but this goes back to making insurance companies money. And you don’t make money unless you can save money. (And let’s not even discuss pharmaceuticals and their costs under this plan…more money, more money, more money!)
Is there any realistic chance that congress can stop Obama from going through with the Iran deal?
Unfortunately, there might be. Congress does still have to ratify treaties. There are a lot of good, well-thought out answers here, and for the most part people seem to be in agreement that cooler heads will prevail.However, I feel a need to remind you all that this is not the heyday of cooler heads.Is it likely that most Republican members of Congress are smart enough to know that we cannot actually afford or manage war with Iran, regardless of what their constituents say? That they will simply give the barbarians back home the old "nod & ignore"? Tell them what they want to hear, then forget all about it when it comes time for the key votes? God, I hope so, but considering the staggering, mind-blowing, colossal insanity, ignorance and stupidity of today's Republican party, I'm honestly not so sure about that.Let's not forget the #47Senators ... Since when has an American President ever had to deal with an entire opposition party willing to literally commit treason just to spite him? We live in strange times to say the least.Scott Walker threatened to invade Iran from his Inaugural Ball. What if he's not kidding? What if the Koch Brothers give him the order? Do you think he'd question the wisdom of the bosses who have gotten him this far? Who got him through the recall mess, which he probably could not have weathered on his own? He has a debt to settle, and that debt will only be greater if they put him on the throne. Compared to that, an international treaty is a paltry excuse for an obligation, according to the lizard brain.Don't get me wrong. I am cautiously optimistic. Obama is nothing if not careful. Some chance for peace is better than none, but it is just that- a chance, not a certainty.
Congress of Future Medical Leaders?
My oldest son has been receiving similar invitations since the 3rd grade. Both my wife and I have been registered nurses for over 20 years, and our son decided he was interested in nursing as a career about 1 year ago, so I am guessing that’s how he got on their mailing list. If one is considering a career in the medical profession, there are many other activities that will prepare you for this. I would suggest getting a part time job in a hospital or clinic. Work at a summer camp as a counselor or instructor. Anything that shows you can handle the responsibility of caring for others. My son, now 18 yrs. old and a soon to graduate senior used about the same amount of money (approx. $1000) last summer to attend training and received his Licensed Nursing Assistance certification. Not only is he receiving hands on education, but he is getting paid for it. As a former Nurse Manager, I can tell you that this looks more impressive on a resume than a 3 day seminar. I suppose everyone must choose their own path. ”A smile is the light in your window that tells others that there is a caring, sharing person inside” -Denis Waitley
Is Congress-free India now a realistic goal for the BJP?
By Congress free India, BJP aims to eradicate an opposition with pan India appeal and secular credentials. They might be able to weaken them. But can’t completely eliminate their presence or signicicance from the country.BJP is still considered to be an upper caste party. They can’t make great levels of penetration towards other communities such as Dalits or minorities. These groups find their solace in sectorial parties or fringe groups. But they can effectively perform on a national level only through collective movements under the aegis of a national party. Congress is the only party with such credentials for the time being. So there is less chances for a complete eradication of congress as BJP wishes.As long as caste system is present in India, neither BJP nor communists can create inroads across the country. People always prefer to vote for the one who understands their language and their plights so the regional parties will continue to blossom. The national parties can only work as leader to spear head their activities through accommodating them.
What are real life examples of logrolling in congress?
A ray is an imaginary or rather an idealistic concept - in reality any light beam can be considered to be made up of many rays, as it would have a finite beginning (the source of light like the sun, or a headlight) and an infinite ending (as there is no point where the light would end on its own). Like you mentioned, a laser is probably the best example of a ray. For other examples, my best guesses would be a light house, a beacon, radio waves or any electro-magnetic waves and hope - ray of hope ;)
Is the Congress of Future Medical Leaders legit?
In my opinion conferences are often a waste of money. Is this a legit company? Sure. (Just because they have a website and facebook page doesn't make them legit). Here is where I have issues: the congress is over a holiday weekend (how ignorant is that?), speakers are still be announced, and people are still being invited. My daughter got her invitation early 2013. Others are just now getting them. By now I would think that they would be full. Apparently not, or they have poor planning. As for the content, it could be interesting. But for the trully motivated individual they can probably find most of the same information on the internet. Why pay $985 for "information" and small chance you could win a scholarship? Because I can guarantee you that most of your time will be spend sitting listening to speakers talk about how great you all are and how medicine is such an important field to go into. Afterward you can mention this congress on your college application but ultimately it depends on your grades and your ability to pay that determines college entry.
What was the goal of the Congress of Vienna?
When the leaders of the great powers met at the Congress of Vienna and signed agreements, they hoped it would restore stability. These agreements strengthened the notion of state sovereignty when then states agreed to preserve territorial boundaries to prevent future disputes, create buffer states (such as Netherlands and Belgium) as small allies, and return to the balance-of-power principle that had operated in the eighteenth century. Fearing a French-like revolution in their own countries, the monarchs were also anxious to put a stop the flames of nationalism and democracy. Hoping that in this way monarchies would be restored and reinforced across Europe, even in France. The goal of restoring stability among the great powers was successful, and the international political system of the nineteenth century was relatively peaceful, compared to previous centuries. During this period, known as the Concert of Europe, there was no conflict in which all five major powers, Austria, Britain, France, Prussia, and Russia, were involved at the same time. Wars between the states occurred, such as Crimean War in 1854 and Franco-Prussian War of 1870, but one or more of the major powers stayed neutral in each of these conflicts.
How can Congress win the 2019 election?
If Congress may not be able to win the election but can aim to get 160+ seats. If Congress gets 160+ seats BJP cannot get majority. It's seats also will considerably reduced. With 160+ seats Congress can try a coalition government with like minded parties. To achieve this feat it can think of these.Do not expose Rahul Gandhi much. He may be used sparingly. Then there will be less attack and less problem. He is the soft spot of attack for BJP.Give a unique development plan for the nation which is different from Gujarat model, and it should be realistic. Party should stick to it at any cost.BJP is sure to go to the public on corruption and black money. Congress should invent something different. Either on poverty alleviation or high jacking the creation of new jobs from BJP or changing the tax structure or doing away with Income Tax etc.Politically study the caste equation in each state or district. Develop a policy for each district such that the major caste combinations support the party.Do not appease minorities. While seeking their support Congress should not do in public glare. Congress also may enroll the support of Hindus by encouraging Hindu pontiffs to contest under the party.Do not name anyone as PM candidate, because no one can face Modi juggernaut. He may fail miserably.Aim only for 160+, do not worry over BJP’s tally. It may also get the same number of seats or little more. But if Congress gets 160+ seats, mobilising a coalition for Congress is easier than BJP. Automatically many smaller parties may distance themselves from BJP. If Congress aims at 275 seats the party may fail to get even 60 seats because it's resources would have got distributed wide.Develop half a dozen Congress leaders who can speak well in simple languages such that the common man understands. Use them extensively for canvassing throughout India. Rahul should not be one of them. He is a pathetic speaker.After the victory, Congress can elect anyone as its leader, may be Rahul. Till then do not reveal the choice to the public and keep it hin suspence.
Can you impeach a Congress member?
That's debatable. From Wikipedia: 'The central question regarding the Constitutional dispute about the impeachment of members of the legislature is this: Are members of Congress "officers" of the United States? The Constitution grants to the House the power to impeach "The President, the Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States." [5] Many believe firmly that Members of Congress are not "officers of the United States." [6]. Others, however, believe that Members are civil Officers and are subject to impeachment. The House of Representatives did impeach a Senator once[7], Senator William Blount. The senate expelled Senator Blount and, after initially hearing his impeachment, dismissed the charges for lack of jurisdiction[8]. Left unsettled was the question "Are members of Congress civil officers of the United States?" The House has never impeached a Member of Congress after Blount and, as each House has the authority to expel their own members—without involving the other chamber; expulsion has been the method used for removing Members of Congress.' Anyway, she would still have to be guilty of high crimes and misdemeanor, and her crime sufficiently embarrassing that a Democrat controlled congress would bother to impeach her. Expulsion would be easier to accomplish, but I don't think even that is realistic at this point. Besides, Republicans were doing the same thing for at least the past six years before this last congress was sworn-in. Yet nobody was impeached for that fiasco, were they?
Will Congress come to power in 2019?
Congress after the death of Indira Gandhi is living on borrowed time. Even though Rajiv could produce a historic mandate of 404 seats with 49.01% vote share in 1984 general election, it happened when the atmosphere was surcharged due to the untimely death of Indira Gandhi. Hence the mandate do not reflect Rajiv’s personal popularity. Probably the party’s decay started in 1984.From 1989 to 2014 eight general elections have taken pĺace. In none of these eight elections Congress could secure majority on its own. Only thrice Congress could form a coalition government and in all these governments the PM are from Congress. Also to be noted is even here Congress secured 244 seats with 34.66% in 1991, 145 seats with 26.53% in 2004, and 208 seats with 28.55% votes. In 2014 it could secure 44 seats with 19.52% votes. Congress votes are dwindling from 1989 onwards. Once its vote share fell below 30% it is not able to recoup to that level in spite of its efforts. Congress failed to address it's problem in the previous eight general elections to reach 30% and above vote share when the requirement is below 4% to 5%. Now it's requirements are huge 11% to reach 30%. Hence problems are compounded and the leadership will not be able to meet the demands.Secondly the hard core Congress states of Haryana, Assam, AP, Manipur which have been returning Congress Party, have opted for BJP. Though these states are not big states the voter’s preferences is having a perceptible change. Congress is definitely not the option.When Congress was in power in 14 states in 2014, either alone or in coalition, could not muster the desired number of seats or vote share. The present Congress has compromised it's position by playing marginal role in coalition governments in states, as in Bihar. It is losing its glamor and position. Now being in power in 6 states comprising 50 parliamentary seats (aporox), will be a herculean task for the party to reach 273 seats. Also to win 150 seats seems impossible. Unless it wins 150 seats Congress cannot play dominant role in coalition government.The present set of leadership in Congress do not match the calibre, stature and intellect of BJP. People do not take Congress leadership seriously.Hence Congress cannot come to power either on its own or in coalition.