What elements would be most likely to form an ion with a 2+ charge?
A +2 charge would include any Group 2 element because they lose two electrons to become stable. This give the element 2 more protons than electrons so it has a +2 charge. Be is the only element from your list in Group 2.
Which two elements are more likely to have the same charge on their ions?Please Help Options are included belo?
Sn and Si
This element would most likely have a charge of? HELP!?
should the electron structure posted 1s 22s 22p 63s 23p 3 actually be 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p3? if so, then you can see it has 5 electrons [2s and 3p] in its outer orbit so will need three more electrons to achieve the structure of the nearest rare gas [Ar] so will have a charge of -3.
How do i determine the charge of the ion most likely to be formed?
I have to find the charge for the following elements LI, Rb, O, F, Mg, Al, and P. I don't quite understand how I'm supposed to do this. This is my thought process for trying to find the charge for lithium. Its in group one so it has one valence electron. the number one is closer to zero than it is to 8 which means it gives away one electron making it have a +1 charge? Would that mean Rb is also +1?
When magnesium forms an ion, what will be the most likely charge?
+2
Indicate the most likely charge on the ion when this atom forms an ion. (Remember the 2, 8, 18 level distrib.?
+2 edit: i'll just help explain it because i also answered another of your questions and hopefully this will help you to understand it. as you must know the first shell in the atom can hold two electrons, the second 8 and so on. so in Magnesium the first shell will have 2. the second will have 8 and then you are left with 2 more electrons. when forming an ion it'd be much easier for the magnesium atom to lose two electrons and become Mg2+ rather than gain six electrons to have a complete outer shell. hence the +2 charge.
What is SpaceX likely to charge for internet access after its constellation of satellites has been deployed? How fast will that internet access be?
I did a bunch of research on this very subject about 5 years ago.The quick answer is that satellite-based Internet will beFastUbiquitousInexpensiveUnfortunately, you only get to choose one.The fundamental problem is that radio bandwidth is an exceptionally limited quantity. Usable bandwidth is even more limited. And you need a lot of bandwidth (see Claude Shannon for details).Now, for terrestrial (cellular) radio we can reuse the same frequencies over and over — as long as two adjacent cells are not using the same frequency we are good. But even the best steerable array antennas have a ground footprint of hundreds of square kilometers, and within that footprint the frequency would be tied up.Satellite internet only makes sense in three scenarios:Mobile users who need ubiquitous but very low bandwidth (eg the Spot communicator)High bandwidth users who want ubiquitous access and will pay for the privilege (eg airplanes, cruise ships)Fixed-point users who need high bandwidth but who can use very high-gain earth stations (eg remote communities, mines, etc).As a result of all of this, the access will be (a) slow and (b) expensive.
Can two similarly charged bodies attract each other?
In our school time we all have read a statement “like charges repel each other and opposite charges attract each other.”Yes two similar charged bodies can attract each other (that too by electrostatic force).What??Were we taught wrong during our school days??Read through to clear all your confusion.All the things can become clear just by understanding the difference between a point charge and a charged body.We have read Coulombs law for electrostatic force between two point charges.The statement like charges repel and opposite charges attract is applicable for point charges or for spherical charges when they are separated by such a large distance so that induction effects can be ignored.We we're not taught wrong during school time.Now how can two similar charged bodies attract each other.This can happen by a phenomena called electrostatic induction.Assume two spherical charged bodies (and not point charges)both having positive charge(deficiency of electrons).Now assume one of the bodies having a very high charge density than the other. When these two bodies are kept close the high charge density of one of the spherical body would attract negative charged electrons(induction).Now as the negatively induced charge is more closer to the larger sphere than positive charge, the net attractive force dominates( at least in this case) than repulsive forces.As a result there is net attraction between two bodies even though these have similar charges.ConclusionTwo similar charged bodies can attract each other through a phenomena called electrostatic induction.Two similar point charges cannot attract each other or in another way electrostatic induction cannot happen in point charges.
The New York D.A. is likely going to file state charges against the Trump organization that he can't pardon. So is it over for President Trump?
No doubt about it.Manafort’s conviction of tax evasion will be echoed by state indictments for state tax evasion, and without any doubt whatsoever, even if Trump pardons his federal convictions, and there are more to come, Trump cannot and will not be able to pardon his state convictions.Cohen has testified that Trump was behind the payoffs to the two women. That’s going to be hard to duck. Cohen is in a tough spot. If HE’s lying, then he’s opened himself up for perjury charges; if HE’s telling the truth, then Trump is in trouble.Trumps son is on the ropes, and it’s only a matter of time before he’s indicted; will he turn? Kushner is on the list as well, and after Trump’s comments that “he’s expendable,” I’m pretty sure he’s going to be more interested in saving his butt and his business than he is in taking one for the president.Why would any thinking, sentient being who doesn’t live under a rock even be in the slightest surprised by any of this? It boggles the mind. And no, it’s not a “witch hunt.” There have been far too many convictions to throw out that canard with any degree of credibility.Trump supporters, what say ye?