Can I sue a bar of being kicked out for no reason?
Here is the deal. Last night our group of friends went to Tavern bar in Houston to have a good time. We were having a good time till the 2 bouncers came and told us to leave and when we ask him why he said he didn't know he was just told by his boss the tell us to leave. I asked to speak to the manager but he refused to go get him. So one of our friends went to the bar and asked for the manager. The bartender asked him why and my friend told her of the situation and she said the reason we are being out is cuz we are some cheap asses.We still had our tabs open so how were we going to tip them if we hadn't closed them? We always leave tips for waitresses and bartenders cuz we know tthat'spart of the way they get paid. It was very hhumiliating We were escorted out and told us we could never come back. I still don't know what we did wrong. Can anybody tell me if I can do anything legal about this situation?
Was kicked out of bar for no reason last night is this wrong?
So I walked into a bar completely sober, got past the bouncers no problem and went to the bar. As soon as I ordered a drink the manager walked up to me and said you’re too drunk, so you can only get food and non alcoholic drinks. Was this wrong? What would you have done in this situation? I’m so mad about it
Can I go back to a bar I was kicked out from?
Depends on your bad behavior that night as well as the staff working the particular night you return. Sure, you could be allowed back in, but if a bartender or bouncer who happens to be working that same night also remembers you & the stupid crap you did to get kicked out, they may keep an "extra eye" on you. How bad your behavior was can surprisingly play a key role, as such people are unforgettable. I deal with the exact same thing 5 days a week when it comes to not only intoxicated hotel guests with enough money to return every 2 weeks, but as well as homeless people who walk into our "open 24 hour a day" hotel. Plus me & the security staff can look at all the security cameras available................... Sorry if I sound like a prick, but my point is not being banned for life does not automatically mean we won't remember you if your behavior was bad enough that night, and you'd be foolish to think we won't recognize you if you ever come back.
Why do you think prominent Republicans cheered when a bakery refused to serve VP Joe Biden in 2012, in protest of his politics, but are upset that the Red Hen Restaurant refused to serve Sarah Huckabee Sanders for the same reasons?
Your link is unavailable here. Perhaps it’s only available in Russia, China, North Korea or some other third wold country where you’re located.I doubt if anyone did, but I’m sure if they did it was in a civil manor. And they probably didn’t run out a follow him over to the next restaurant across the street and act like crazy liberals do.Perhaps you don’t know it but Joe’s and and John Kerry’s son are big into Chinese banking like so many other politicians relatives. That’s why they’re against Trump’s trade wars. They couldn’t care less about Americans. That’s how we’re gotten into this mess in the first place. Check out the politic ans on both sides of the aisle and where they have investments. sALL politicians can be bought for money. That’s why they think they can buy treaties and trade agreements.Trump has no price tag on him and they hate it. The Bush’s made their early money in armaments ( that’s why they love wars) and then in oil. They love foreign oil because it drove up the price of theirs. This idea of becoming energy independent is repulsive to them.There are many stories in the deep state and many reasons why the average working man here in this country has been taken advantage of for 50 years. Reagan was another outsider who tried and actually slowed the corruption down, , but politicians soon took back over. Trump inherited a mess both here and abroad, is fixing it, and they want him impeached for spoiling there game.ead the “Secret Empires” by Peter Schweizer.
Why is that a baker who doesn’t want to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple is vilified, but a restaurant that refused to serve President Trump’s press secretary, nobody says a word?
“[Anonymous asks:] Why is that a baker who doesn’t want to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple is vilified, but a restaurant that refused to serve President Trump’s press secretary, nobody says a word?”Two reasons:The restaurateur is refusing service for things that the press secretary has done. Remember that, because conservatives love talking about taking responsibility for your own actions. The Baker is refusing service because of the way that the gay couple were born. So you would argue that they could go somewhere else right? Well not always because…The majority of the population in America is Christian. If that Christian baker is allowed to refuse service to gays because of religion, well now every Christian has the power to refuse service to gays. This is a problem because this doesn't just include cakes. It also includes wedding halls, wedding chapels, caterers. In a town like San Francisco or New York this might not be a problem, but in a backwater town with few options for almost anything this is a big problem. It could come to a point where a gay couple will have to travel far and wide to find service for their wedding. Imagine that all the businesses in town have already decided through the grapevine that they all will refuse service. That is now completely legal. And of course to answer the question, yeah that might happen to the press secretary too. But understand that she's working for the POTUS. At any minute she can have someone else fetch her whatever she wants. So please spare us the indignity of the poor press-secretary getting a little come-uppance. It's not even close to the same level.Discrimination because of ones actions vs. discrimination due to you wanting to act in accordance to the way you were born (sounds almost like racism) THAT is the difference.
I used to work at Kroger in Jefferson,GA very racist town, and I was the only black girl working at the deli.?
I was the only black girl working at the deli and bakery department, I was getting less hours compared to the other workers but the schedule was suppose to be done according to seniority I started im May 2007 and people that came after me around June 2007 was getting 40 hours every week and when I ask for more hours the managers will tell me they dont have any more hours but I was there first. I was called the black girl by other employees, I was told by the deli manager that my lips were to pink and she got a black marker and started drawing in my face with the black marker, I got kicked out at the bakery because another employee came back and she was gone for 4 months and they gave her a choice to make to be back at the bakery or go to the deli and she chosed to go back to the bakery because it was less work to do there and me I got kicked out with no explanations whatsoever, I made several complaints to the namagers nothing was done about my situations, I was sexually harrassed, etc
Regarding the recent 'gay wedding cake' case, and Sarah Sanders being kicked out of a restaurant, is there any consistent way to support the baker and oppose the restaurant? Similarly, can you consistently oppose the baker and support the restaurant?
The key difference that I see is that the baker tried to avoid a group of people based on something irrelevant to the business, and the restaurant tried to avoid a single person based on knowledge of her character that was relevant to their business. That’s the difference between prejudice and judgement. Both of those words are related to the Latin word judicium, but our society generally says it is bad to exercise prejudice, but good to exercise judgement.Knowing that a customer was gay, the baker decided he didn’t want to sell them a wedding cake. That’s prejudice; being gay has nothing to do with the business transaction, but the baker thought it was somehow immoral. Knowing that somebody doesn’t pay their bills, a baker could decide not to bake them a cake without payment in advance. That would be judgement.The restaurant was judging Sarah Huckabee Sanders. They evaluated her character based on her public actions and decided that she was likely to mistreat the restaurant staff, most of whom were gay and/or immigrants. They exercised judgement, and decided not to do business with an individual they knew.I can think of four moral philosophies to use here:Prejudice is always bad. We should restrict prejudice to a level that judgement is also restricted, and accept that trade-off. Both the bakery and the restaurant were wrong, because a business should never refuse service.Judgement is always good. We should allow a business to exercise judgement and the freedom of association, and accept the trade-off that maybe more prejudice will be allowed. Both the bakery and the restaurant were OK, anyone can refuse service to anyone at any time.Prejudice is bad but judgement is good, and people are smart enough to tell the difference. The bakery was wrong, but the restaurant was right.Religious freedom is more important than freedom of association, so following what one sect of Christianity preaches is more important than allowing a restaurant to ask a patron to leave. The baker, because of convictions sanctioned by a major religion, was the only one who was acting morally.I think you have to resort to philosophy #4 to approve of the bakery but not the restaurant. Most people seem to believe in philosophies 1–3 instead.