Why dobson telescope isn't good for astrophotography?
Hi Zoran - You are essentially correct. A Dobsonian mount is designed to be low in cost and easy to transport and set up. A classic Dob has no tracking motor, which means that you must keep the target in view by continually making small manual corrections - basically pushing the scope by hand to keep the object centered. This is fine for one or two visual observers out for a casual session. Doing this during an astrophotography exposure, however, results in a non-picture - full of lines and light traces - a real mess. Astrophotography can be a challenging hobby. In general, it requires either an equatorial setup with a decent tracking motor or one of the more recent computer driven fork- mounts.
Which is the best telescope to buy for astrophotography for $1000?
You can get short tube refractor for deep sky objects or a small to mid-size catadioptric scope like a Maksutov or SCT for planetary astrophotography for $1000. However this is just the price of the telescope tube.A suitably stiff tripod or pier, mount, and needed astrophotography accessories like field flatteners, guide scopes, adapters, filters, etc. not including the camera will run in the neighborhood of 3 to 5 X the price of the telescope tube.The only practical astrophotography setup for less than several thousand dollars is a camera and lens based setup. The lower weight allows less expensive tripods and mounts to be used.This may be helpful:Getting started in astrophotography?Here is an example image and the equipment used to make it:2nd hand heavy duty tripod with pan and tilt head- $50 (new $400+)Vixen Polarie star tracking mount - $300 on sale (normally $350)Inexpensive Chinese ball head to mount camera on mount $30alignment scope for mount - $200 optional2nd hand Sony NEX-5n camera body $150 (new mirrorless a6000 body $500)2nd hand vintage 135mm prime telephoto lens with adapter - $50 (new $300 - 4000)Intervalometer $35UV/IR blocking filter $20Cost $635 (mostly 2nd hand or on sale) - $1835 (new)The “telescope” in this setup is the camera lens. You can see that it is only about 10–20% of the total cost. The heavier weight and longer focal lengths of a “real telescope” cause the costs of the mounting and tracking hardware to increase dramatically.
What is the best telescope under $1500 for astrophotography?
At $1500 or less, there are a ton of amazing telescopes to browse. Not exclusively do you have to discover an extension that fits your financial plan, you additionally need one that will do what you need it to do. There are colossal contrasts in telescopes that are utilized to spot untamed life instead of the degrees that are most appropriate for peering into the sky. When purchasing a telescope, one of the greatest missteps that individuals make is getting one that doesn't fit them. The exact opposite thing that we need is for you to commit an error, so we've looked into and tried the best telescopes under $1000 with the goal that you can feel good settling in your purchasing choice.Best New Telescopes | Reviews and Beginner Buying GuideCelestron Nexstar 6 SEIn case you're into the survey and shooting heavenly items, then the Celestron Nexstar 6 SE is for you.The 100% waterproof and fog proof spotting degree gives extremely sharp pictures of your most loved natural life or focuses on the range.The degree acknowledges 125mm eyepieces, 82mm channels, and incorporates Pentax USA's "Straightforward" Warranty, which implies that for a little delivering charge, Pentax will repair or supplant this spotting extension to the first buyer, regardless of the possibility that you incidentally harm it.This excellent telescope includes an accuracy Schmidt-Cassegrain optical framework with 1500 mm central length at ƒ10.0 and gives 44% more light assembling than a 5″ telescope.Best New Telescopes | Reviews and Beginner Buying GuideCelestron's SkyAlign framework is a productive and quick arrangement handle. You can then utilize the mechanized handset to see any of about 40,000 items put away in its database.You can even attach it to a PC for cutting edge control of the telescope.The telescope incorporates a tripod with an adornment plate and a 2-year guarantee.
Which telescopes are good for astrophotography?
“What is the best telescope for astrophotography?”—————There is no single best telescope for astrophotography. I know several excellent astrophotographers who use all kinds of instruments, including DSLRs with long telephoto lenses.If you’re going for long-duration deep sky astrophotos, the mount is far more important than the telescope itself. You need a stable mount with that tracks reliably with minimal errors. Unless you’re using a very high-end mount that has been accurately aligned, you’ll also need a mount that can be autoguided. [1] In practice, to get long unguided exposures requires an extremely good (and thus extremely expensive) mount with a permanent installation.With modern DSLR cameras and telephoto lenses, you can get some remarkably good images with a simple Barn door tracker. There are also good commercial trackers for cameras available for a few hundred dollars.If you’re interested in lunar and planetary photography [2], you can get some good results with small telescopes and mid-level mounts. There are good entry level cameras that work very well with the Moon and bright planets.TL;DR — The telescope is the least of your problems. A good mount and a good camera are much more important.——————[1] To be fair, you could guide manually, which was the only option in the “old days.” I don’t recommend it.[2] That can include solar photography if you’re using a certified solar filter and you know how observe the Sun safely. I’m not trying to be flippant, but if you need to ask how to observe the Sun, you probably don’t know how to do it safely. Get the education first before you try observing the Sun.
Astrophotography Telescope. Orion Star Seeker?
The mount on that scope is apt to be quite frustrating to use. While it's a "goto" system, it's actually not very well made. A friend started out with one, and used it for less than a month before deciding to upgrade. It seemed to vibrate even when we couldn't feel a breeze. As others have pointed out, imaging is a particularly demanding aspect of the hobby. You could put your D90 in a Dobsonian in your price range and get reasonably nice photos of the Moon, as it's a bright sunlit object. The technique would sort of work for imaging Jupiter and Saturn, except those planets are very far away, and the image on your d90 chip will be incredibly tiny, and remarkably unimpressive. If imaging deep sky objects really is an important short term goal, you will need a beefy equatorial mount. The optical tube is less important, but a newtonian is certainly the bang for the buck champ. The Orion Sirius EQ-G is one of the lowest cost mounts suited for imaging. Beyond that, DSLR's aren't great for deep sky imaging. Some people do get outstanding results, but they're doing a lot of extra manipulation of the images after they take the shots. It's generally easier to get good results if you use a dedicated astronomy camera, in part because these normally have systems to cool the imaging chip so it has less thermal noise for time exposures. Your best bet is to track down a local astronomy club, and get involved with them. You might find someone who is willing to let you take a few shots through their telescope. Here's a link to an astronomy club finder: < http://www.skyandtelescope.com/community... > Here's a link to some deep sky shots I've taken with my scope - a couple of these were taken with a D70. Most were taken with a dedicated camera with an autoguider. < http://www.picturetrail.com/sfx/album/vi... > Here's a shot a friend and I took of Jupiter with one of my scopes, using a dedicated planet camera: < http://www.holden-insurance.com/jupiter8... > Here's a shot of the Moon (also using the dedicated planet camera): < http://www.holden-insurance.com/Moon140M.jpg > Here's a photo of my smaller telescope set up for deep sky imaging: < http://www.holden-insurance.com/mshtmbyh.jpg > Good luck.
Best telescope for astrophotography with DSLR (under $2,000)?
I am looking for a nice telescope that i can take with me into the dark night and start filming deep space and planets as well as the moon and all that jazz with using my DSLR to capture it. What would you recommend? why? what do i need to look for? new to the astrophotography world so any help would be much appreciated. My questions may be vague, but maybe you can help me ask the right ones. Thank you!
Which of these two telescopes would be better astrophotography?
I'm with those who say neither of these are really not the scope to go with for AP. The mount, however, is an acceptable starter platform, if you have the right scope and camera for it.This mount, the AVX, is about $800 brand-new. The next step up from Celestron, the CGEM, runs about $1300-$1400 brand new. It's a more capable mount, but it's also a biggerr price... and even then, there's a lot better out there. Still, you should expect your mount to be the single most expensive piece of equipment.The AVX, however, was designed with the beginning astrophotgrapher in mind. If you don't put a lot of weight on it, it is capable of tracking well enough to do some decent imaging over shorter exposures. With autoguiding, you can probably get some pretty decent longer exposures from a small scope.If I were putting together a beginner's set of equipment for astrophotography, I'd take the AVX and get two Orion ST-80 refractors. The ST-80 is pretty cheap (about $110 brand new, scope only). It's not the greatest scope out there, but it's acceptable for a beginner. If you get two, you can use one for imaging and one for guiding. With the mount and the two scopes, you're looking at about $1,000 (not counting shipping or tax). You'll need some mounting hardware (I usually use Telescope Accessories and Hardware for my rings, rails, etc). It'd be fair to expect upwards of $200 for all of that, so we're in the $1,200 neighborhood. Do some poking around online and you should be able to find a used camera that'll work for guiding. I've been using an older Meade DSI. It's low resolution and monochrome, but all I need it to do is display a star for the software (I use PHD, which is free) to lock on to. Add in some kind of imaging camera (a used, modified DSLR is a decent option to start), and the cables and adapters to connect to a laptop, and you can probably be up and running for under $2,000 for everything.This is, of course, a starter rig. I'd definitely want to upgrade the imaging scope (maybe to the Astro-Tech 72mm imaging refractor?), and that mount is a godo start, but not beefy enough to run a much bigger scope (I've had my eye on the Astro-Tech 8" newt for a while, but the AVX, while it could handle it, would be pushign it's weight budget and you want to stay WELL under the recommended weight if doing AP).Bottom line: AP isn't cheap. But that mount and a few changes to the payload can get you started.
Astrophotography: What are the best telescopes available for an amateur?
As mentioned by Vardhan Thigle I would also suggest buying telescope from Tejraj and Co. For ease of use and for cost considerations, I would suggest a newtonian reflector telescope with Diameter of about 4-5 inch, i.e 120 mm. In particular Star tracker reflectors ( SKY Telescopes in India, Startracker System), Sky Watcher(BKP 1149 EQ1, Black Diamond, Sky Watcher Telescope) seem to be some of them in this budget range on Tejraj's site.EDIT:Btw: If you want it for Astrophotography, then only reasonable photos you can expect are of moon, sun (with a filter) and very few bright objects. A tracking mount is needed for prolonged exposure. That will increase your budget.