Is a cancer cure being suppressed for the benefit of big pharma profit and the economy?
More and more I don't trust pharmaceuticals, as most treatments, and pills are extremely diluted and synthetic treatments of their NATURAL counterparts (herbs, plants, etc.). So I took a look at history, specifically the birth of modern pharmaceutical based treatments, and most practices were born out of the Rockefeller Foundation in the early quarter of the 20th century. When cancer, or even leukemia was non existent in civilization let alone in children. Since the 1940's cancer in general has doubled, even tripled in certain diagnosis', so if we are at the cutting edge of medical technology, what is the major malfunction here? As far as most infectious diseases being eradicated by vaccinations and modern medicine in the 20th century, that just isn't true, because if you eliminate vaccinations, we would still notice an eradication of most infectious diseases in the Western world thanks to the implementation of proper sanitation. So to me, the vaccinations were not the answer to eradication for the most part. Except maybe the case for Polio. We have given hundreds of billions of dollars to cancer 'research' over the past few decades, but a cure is as far away as it ever has been. Why? To end my point, the people in charge of running these massive pharmaceutical corporations like Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, etc are NOT, I repeat NOT in the business of curing people of anything but only treating symptoms, in order for the patient to come back for more, which = $$$. Quite the contrary, the more people are sick for longer, the more revenue generation and profits. If we take the amount of people suffering from major debilitating diseases such as cancer, AIDS/HIV, Parkinson's, etc. How much profit and revenue would be lost because hundreds of millions of people would be cured, and wont be taking their pills anymore? Or how many doctors and nurses would be out of a job? Think about it. And these CEO, CFO's, shareholders and executives would LOSE big time. So from my perspective, it's best to look after your own body, and staying away from the standard American diet, because as far as I am concerned it will increase your chances of getting cancer, along with environmental factors, etc. So yes, i will openly say their is a conspiracy to keep a cure for cancer out of the public's hands for the sake of corporate monopolism. Do you think so?
Do you believe a CURE FOR CANCER already exists ?
Cancer is a collective term for approximately 200 different diseases. Every cell type in your body can (in principle) develop into its own type of cancer. And the cells within each individual cancer are different too. On top of that, cancer cells interact with the surrounding normal cells in very complex ways. So it is not all that surprising that we don't have a single easy cure for all cancers. That being said, many cancers are cured on a daily basis. Most of them through surgery, but some of them are treated with additional radio-/chemotherapy. And some cancers are cured by chemotherapy alone. On the internet there are many claims of miraculous "natural" cancer cures that are being suppressed. Here some of them are listed, with links to sites explaining what is wrong with them: http://anaximperator.wordpress.com/2011/...
Do you believe a cure to cancer already exists? Would corporations lose billions of dollars if they funded a cure?
Yes and Yes. Read the 1953 Fitzgerald Report - Suppressed Cancer Treatments made for the government.Read Dr. Richard Schulze clinical history, site and blog. Read about the Hoxsey clinic. Hoxsey was taken to court many times, but hundreds of people would appear saying MDs had given them months to live and after being almost dead they went to Hoxsey’s and in a few weeks they recovered and had no more cancer. Later the FBI had to close the clinic, because too many were waking up. Read about the Gerson Therapy, Max Gerson was a MD. Dr. Richard Schulze also had his clinic closed after 30 years of healing the living dead, almost all with dead sentences on their heads. He still has his Incurables program and his own healing miracles, having healed his heart when he was young from a genetic heart valve problem, regenerated a 4th degree burned hand and later a completely destroyed knee after a sky accident. There are many doctors, who nowadays discovered that vaccines destroy the immune system, the brain and create allergies, cancer, and a host of other problems. But the pharma crimes continue to be hidden and probably will until Jesus comes.
Has anyone read that book called 50 cures they don't want you to know about?
I think that's the name of the book. Author Kevin Landreau I believe. What do you think about it? You think the government, FDA, Pharmaceutical companies are like that? This book really pissed me off
GOVERNMENT HIDING CURE FOR CANCER?
You do realize there is more than one government in the world, don't you? In other countries like the UK and Australia (and most of Europe), healthcare is completely government funded. In other words, the government has to pay for it. We have a two party system in the US that is obviously unable to agree about much. Do you seriously think that the numbers needed to prove a cure for 200 diseases (cancer is not just one disease) are all keeping secrets to protect the government? Seriously? All those people in clinical trials proving such cures won't tell anyone? I. don't. think. so. Please also read: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/occams...
Can Garlic Cure Cancer?
From what I've read/learned its natures antibiotic. I've also heard stories where people have claimed it has many other benefits I was not aware of including, according to some claims, a cancer fighter.