Why do people think George Zimmerman is innocent?
Here's how I see it: 1. Trayvon Martin wasn't doing anything, yet George Zimmerman responded as if he was. 2. Despite not seeing a crime Zimmerman called the police and followed behind. Then he starts saying Trayvon looks like he's on drug, has a problem, looks like he's a burglar and looks like he has a weapon. We later find all of that untrue. He had no weapon, he looked fine minutes early and the store clerk said he was normal, and no one else ever said or reported that Trayvon was casing the place. 3. On the 911 tape he says Trayvon ran away and he lost him, then he says he's following him. Why on earth would you pursue someone that you didn't see commit a crime and they are now running away from you? 4. Trayvon running away and taking shortcuts to lose Zimmerman is consistent with Jeantel's testimony and Zimmerman's 911 tape call. 5. Why would Jeantel lie, she made Trayvon look bad, whats her motive to lie? 6. From what Jeantel heard, it sounds like Zimmerman grabbed or pushed Trayvon, which caused Trayvon to respond that way. 7. Why would Trayvon randomly attack Zimmerman and he has no history of being that way, yet Zimmerman has a aggressive past. He was aggressive with officer and at the time he already had a restraining order on him, and a ex co-worker said he was aggressive at times. Yet the focus is on Trayvon's behavior, which not one person who knew him ever said he was that way. 8. Why on earth would Trayvon run away if he wants to bet him up?
George Zimmerman so clearly innocent ABC isnt going to even bother with any more political cover ups?
ABC sure was shady about the Zimmerman Martin incident. Did everything they could to frame my man Z. Now they don't bother anymore. Why? They are finally admitting to THC in Martin's body as well as Zimmer's injuries amongst other things. Looks like another loss for the liberal news.
What do you think of George Zimmerman's recent arrest on domestic violence? Does his recent arrest lead us deeper into the true nature of who George Zimmerman is?
It calls his character into question and with it everything we thought we knew about the verdict in the Trayvon Martin trial. The rabid supporters of his and the verdict forget that we only had his word that Martin was the aggressor. In the absence of any physical evidence proving otherwise, Zimmerman's word was good enough for an acquittal. But in the court of public opinion, things have changed. Let's be clear, Zimmerman is being accused of a lot more than garden variety domestic violence. First, police have now responded to two domestic violence incidents with two separate women in less than three months - and this in less than five months since his acquittal. Now we have him allegedly pointing a loaded gun at his new girlfriend and apparently barricading himself in the house after police arrived on the scene. Add to this the earlier history of violent incidents including resisting arrests and it is becoming clear that Zimmerman is a liar and a habitually violent and frequently out of control man who should never have been allowed to possess a gun. Given that, why should we give him the benefit of the doubt about Martin or anything else? This man is a public menace. And some of his ardent supporters on the right better hope that he and they don't have more blood on their hands real soon.
Why did you support George Zimmerman during Trayvon Martin’s murder case?
His name is George, not Andrew.And why would I support him? Simple. Straightforward. At the time he pulled out his gun and fired, Trayvon Martin had him pinned on the ground and was beating him relentlessly. All the bullshit in the world from the ‘other side’ doesn’t negate that fact, proven in court. He didn’t have to ‘perceive’ a threat; he was being beaten. He also had been calling for help and no one came and stopped Martin.This is one of the most justified shootings I am aware of. There was no question he was being severely assaulted.The only debate is from people who think he ‘deserved’ to be beaten and had to just lie there and endure it. Those people are absolutely nuts. They’d sure feel differently if someone had knocked them to the ground, jumped on their chest and hit them over and over, picked up their heads and smashed them on the concrete, and continued the beat down. They would sure like to have a gun and get out of that beating if they could. But they don’t think Zimmerman had that right.And apparently those people think Trayvon Martin had a right to react violently and beat Zimmerman to a point. So, there it is. Make a black person mad, he has a right to beat you and you have to endure it. That’s the logic of the left. You’re at fault for pissing off the black person.
Why is the Zimmerman case such a big deal?
Zimmerman has demonstrated that some Americans are tired of being the victims of violent black criminals roaming their neighborhoods. I, for one, have NEVER been robbed by anyone other than a black criminal. Does that make me a racist or does that make THEM racist? No, they're just criminals who all happened to be blacks attacking a victim who happens to be white. Would they all bleed the same color if I were to justifiably shoot the next one who tried it? If "education is always a good idea" then why does someone with that name clearly and repeatedly demonstrate that she doesn't have one? If you continue to make up numerous facts, you soon become irrelevant. It would help if we actually knew all the facts, but she's adding lies that she wants to be true. If you're a concerned citizen and spot a criminal in your neighborhood, YOU DO HAVE THE RIGHT to ask them what the heck they're up to. They have the right to walk away. They do NOT have the right to sucker punch you and then try to take your gun away from you. If you phone the police and they say, "We don't need you to be following him", that is NOT any instruction, let alone ORDER not to continue following the suspect -- they are saying, "the police are not specifically asking you to do that, but you can certainly continue doing anything that is legal, if you think it might help." When a person is being attacked by a criminal (Trayvon was apparently a criminal at that point), he certainly has a right to defend himself. When that threat becomes potentially lethal, he CERTAINLY has the right (if not the obligation) to use lethal force. ZImmerman had a right to have a gun. Trayvon had the right to walk away. Self-defense is not a crime, let alone murder. Did Zimmerman have x-ray vision and knew this criminal he was watching didn't have his own gun or other weapon? Add: Trayvon was not "an unarmed person"; he was within a split second of having a gun of his own, had he succeeded in overpowering Zimmerman.
How is George Zimmerman guilty?
The prosecution has done a poor job in my opinion. Would anyone make a compelling argument why George Zimmerman is guilty. Here is what I'm aware of; 1. Zimmerman is the neighborhood watch person. He is aware that there have been many burglaries. 2. Zimmerman sees Trayvon walking behind people's houses. It's raining, yet Trayvon continues to stroll around the neighborhood. He looks suspicious. (This is NOT racial profiling) 3. Zimmerman calls the cops. He get's out of his car and looks for a street name sign. Trayvon believes Zimmerman is trying to stalk him. 4. Trayvon confronts Zimmerman and breaks his nose and bangs his head on the concrete. 5. Out of self defense, Zimmerman shoots Martin. I believe that this is a self defense case. Zimmerman was obviously injured by Martin and needed to use force to save his life. What evidence is there that Zimmerman murdered Trayvon??? What evidence is there that Zimmerman racially profiled Trayvon?
Why do people defend George Zimmerman?
why is it that when white people defend themselves or give a good showing for fighting back the forces of evil that lurks within the hearts and minds of black and Mexican criminals that they are blasted for being racist , but when you see videos of blacks blindsiding whites and knocking them unconscious for no good reason you turn a blind eye to them. So in your eyes blacks can get away with mayhem but whites cant ? Are blacks not accountable for their actions ? Here comes a junior gang member thug jumping a white guy in the dark , beating the crap out of him. If I were in Georges shoes I wouldn't hesitate to fire at will and kill the attacker. George did what he had to do to safeguard himself and the community. Bravo George. You can come live in my neighborhood.