If you had to feed yourself on $1.00 / day what would you eat?
Bread Fruit Ramen Egg ღღღ
If you had to choose between feeding your dog or yourself, what would you do?
I was in this exact situation for 8 months while homeless. And everytime I fed the dog.Whenever I received food, I immediately gave it to my dog. When you’re homeless you always want money over food. I can do so much more with cash than I can with your leftovers. Sorry but it’s true. Don’t get me wrong, I was still extremely thankful. It’s hard to store food and ration it, so whatever I got I gave to my dog.I treated my dog a lot better than I did myself. I gave my dog the only blankets I had. Once my aunt said I could stay the night at her place. My dog got the sofa and I got the hardwood floor.
If you were alone on an island and you could feed yourself with only meat or fruit, which one would keep you alive longer?
The premise is not plausible and despite what appears to be intent to force people to choose between a vegetarian and carnivorous diets, it is not relevant to that question, because a fruit only diet is not a vegetarian diet, which typically includes a balance of all types of edible plant foods especially grains and legumes, not just fruits and vegetables. A fruit only diet is not complete nutrition, it is not even close, thus the questioner is forcing people to choose meat, even though a meat only diet is not healthy either.As to why the question is not plausible, there is no reason why a deserted island would not have a full range of edible vegetarian foods, not just plants, and if it also had animal life that you could successfully catch with the tools available to you there is no plausible reason why you shouldn’t eat both plant foods and meat and thus get complete nutrition.
Would you eat less meat if you had to kill it all yourself?
I would eat more meat. Here's why.First of all, I like meat enough that I would not be willing to give it up completely, and that means that I'd be killing some myself. There's two ways to get meat at that point, hunting and raising one's own livestock... Either of those methods are pretty cost intensive on the front end. Hunting means buying gear, a rifle, and probably a pickup. Livestock means space, and facilities for animals, and dealing with waste and such. Both require facilities to prepare and butcher an animal. But once you have those things, the cost per pound of meat is really pretty low. For many years, I never had beef. Meat in my family was either from deer or elk, hunted by my father. Most of that meat was much better than what I get in the grocery store. Part of it was because it's not fed a perfectly processed diet to maximize growth rate and pounds of product. Part of it is because there's something special about producing your own food, whether grown from your own garden, taken with your own rifle, or caught on your own fishing line.
If you eat yourself, would you grow or disappear?
Hmm requires a little magical thinking. Presuming you arent feeling any pain nor bleeding out. i would eat both legs and one arm. From there I could, I guess, put on a little bit of fat since I can't work out anymore. However, assuming I am only eating myself and nothing else I would also be eliminating so my mass would lower, thus I'd be shrinking.If I were able to continue eating myself beyond the destruction of my organs I would get smaller still. However, I'm not sure how I would eat my own head.Or, I could control my own mass and draw (eat) all of it into myself compacting further and further. If I did this far enough I would eventually turn my body into a tiny singularity which would evaporate and then, yes I would disappear.
What happens if you eat yourself?
Well, think about the relationship between the volume of your stomach and the volume of the rest of your body. You could only eat parts of yourself at a time, as your stomach would fill up, and you'd have to wait to digest yourself and go to the toilet. I would recommend eating your limbs first, as you need the core of your body to perform this feat: a brain to control everything, a mouth to eat the parts, a throat to swallow them, a stomach to break them down, intestines to push them down, and a rectum to to get rid of them.Then, once you're left with no arms or legs, things get kind of tricky. If you eat bottom up, then you'll eventually have to eat your stomach, and thus cannot finish the rest of your body off. If you go top down, you'll have no mouth to eat with nor brain to control the function of eating. Someone else will have to somehow continue the function of your stomach, intestines, and rectum, and slowly drop parts of your upper half into your stomach.Then, at this point, depending on which way you went, you either have an upper half left or a lower half. Forgetting about the fact that you'd definitely be dead at this point, to finish the entire process off we'd have to continue with the lower half. Somebody would begin feeding your stomach parts from the very bottom of the lower half, which means that after you stomach digests them there would be nowhere for them to go, so they'd kind of just flop out on the ground after. Ultimately, you'd be left only with a stomach, as it's broken down all the other body parts. I suppose you could try to collapse the stomach so it feeds on itself, but even then there's a covering of slime and goop all over the walls so the acid doesn't actually hurt you. Really, the stomach is the end of the line, I think.So, in answer to your question, no, you will not become twice as large, but (with the help from a really strange and willing friend of yours), you could disappear to the point of your stomach. Ultimately, the rate at which you eat yourself depends upon the volume of your stomach to the volume of the rest of your body, and how quickly your stomach digests flesh, muscle, and bones. I don't know the answer to this, but I assume it'd be quite the process. Definitely take the day off work if you don't think you can finish in time.
If you were to eat yourself, would you disappear or become fat?
The trick on this question is that it is asking for something which is practically impossible.So, you have likely seen pictures of people in the poorest of third world countries, such as Ethiopia. If not, Google it.But have you ever seen anyone eat themselves to survive?The closest to someone eating themselves is that cartoon where a guy wakes up in the same bed with a girl he met the previous night when he was drunk while she is still asleep, and she is so ugly that he has to chew his arm off in order to not wake her up and she jumps on him again!So basically, this has never ever happened.Even in the worst of human conditions, no person ever tries to eat themselves. Itself, this is an interesting phenomenon. Why would someone prefer to die rather than just eat themselves to survive?But of course, before one considers eating themselves, it must be mentioned that almost no person would rather die than ever eat any other human being. Likely, hardly anyone on the planet would even subconsciously consider that.So, with basically no practical proof of the action asked in the question, what could anyone ever answer?But if one was to assume thay will is not an obstacle, what would actually happen?Well, literally thinking, the answer is none of the two options: The person would die before they had the time to either become fat or disappear.
Can i feed my turtles some tuna? (serious answers please)?
Pellets are best!! Mixed with some other food. Yes they can have tuna it is often used to entice one to eat something. They can also have beef, chicken,bugs and worms if you are willing to watch them eat them. I have mollies and occasionally I give them a live one as a treat. They will eat melons, banana's, apples, berries, canalope, carrots duckweeds, romaine lettuce, green beans, corn, cabbage. Stay away from spinach and broccoli. Iceburg lettuce also has no value
Is it normal to feel aroused when i breastfeed?
It's normal to feel slightly aroused since you're only starting. The feeling will go away pretty soon, trust me. But I don't think it's normal to be so aroused that you want to touch yourself. When you feel aroused, do you end up fantasizing? If so, you're getting yourself more aroused. I would suggest not thinking about it too much. Breastfeeding is a bonding experience with your baby. I would suggest singing to your baby while you nurse and just stare into your baby's face. There is nothing so magical. Or inspect your baby's hands and feet... babies grow up so fast, so I would take in these moments deeply if I were you. Oh and to answer your question about touching yourself while breastfeeding, well...no that's not normal. And you should do it. Like I just said, nursing is bonding moment for you and your child. You can't do a lot of bonding when you're playing with yourself. You should stop this immediately. If you can't stop yourself, you should buy a breastpump and feed your baby through a bottle.