TRENDING NEWS

POPULAR NEWS

In The New Superman Movie Wat Is The Major Flaw I Keep Hearing About

Batman vs. Superman, who would win?

Batman no question about it, he has already won in two seperate Frank Miller comics. They key to Batmans is his intelligence, he knows Supermans weakness is kryptonite, so what does he do. Batman goes and gets kryptonite boxing glvoes and beats the hell out of supermam!!!

What do you think was the #1 problem with Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice?

The complete and utter lack of heroism. This is supposed to be a story about superheroes, at the end of the day, and there is nothing even mildly heroic about these characters. Batman is a homicidal maniac and Superman is a man-child absent speech and direction. Ben Affleck’s portrayal of Batman was stated to the best of all time, and this was a Batman with a kill count so high he was closer to Rambo than the World’s Greatest Detective.Superman, whom most would recognize as the world’s greatest hero, is stuck being indecisive, an inert and impotent symbol of nothing. He is force applied to rubber, or the equivalent of chasing a fly with a barbell. He’s in a film and dies, and no one really cares, much as no one cares about the pigeon droppings on a patina coloured statue.Superman doesn’t detect the bomb, because it was encased in lead. Forget about super-hearing, smell, or the fact that he can tell something’s wrong just by the senator’s reaction. Forget that Superman’s speed would allow him to save most of the people, if not all of them. The scene is designed to make him a failure, and keep him from what he does best, help people. Instead, he’s made to stand like a simpleton and look at the carnage, before he lifts a finger to do a thing. He’s too busy feeling sorry for himself, instead of thinking about the people. Much like his tears after killing Zod, Synder believes that a crying Superman is enough to mitigate that he’s heroic as a perforated bucket.Compare that with this scene from Daredevil Season 2:Daredevil has just had a knock down fight with the Punisher, makes it to the lift, and is looking to avoid fighting further. However, when an innocent enters the picture, Daredevil doesn’t hesitate for a moment. He sees the man to safety, and then proceeds to defeat his would be assailants. He accomplishes the mission, and doesn’t have to compromise another’s life to do so. If this was BvS, Daredevil would have cried in the lift going down, while we heard the screams of the man dying. That, or Daredevil would have had to kill the men, against his own code, proving the Punisher’s twisted logic right.Superman and Batman aren’t superheroes in the film, they’re merely super-human, and incredibly damaged ones at that. Absent heroism, there’s little attraction for these characters and this woeful film.

Why do you love Batman Vs. Superman: Dawn of Justice?

While I did enjoy the fight scenes, especially that Batman clearly beat Superman, this movie definitely has flaws. Luthor is not like the comic or cartoon version, the awful looking Doomsday, the Martha scene, it trying to be both a “Vs” movie and a team up movie.There's an animated movie called “The Batman Superman Movie”. It is leagues better than BVS. It has Joker steal a small kryptonite statue from a art museum and then team up with Luthor to kill Superman in exchange for a lot of money. Batman goes to Metropolis to stop Joker, and he meets Superman. The two work together to stop Joker and Luthor. This is a great animated movie that respects all it's characters. I highly recommend it.Animated versions being better is in my opinion, a big problem with three DCEU movies. “The Batman Superman Movie” is better than BVS. “Batman: Assault on Arkham” is a better Suicide Sqaud movie than “Suicide Sqaud” is. And “Justice League War” is a better justice league team up movie than “Justice League”.

Ironman vs. Superman. Who would win and why.?

Ironman. Well let's see... we have "The Man of Steal" vs. a guy wearing an iron suit. At first everyone will say Superman, but I think Ironman would win and here's why:

Superman

Powers and abilities: Super strength, super hearing, super speed, eye laser, icy breath, flight, X-ray vision

Intelligence: Above average

Ironman

Powers and abilities: Super strength, incredible speed, dozens of weapons of mass destruction

Intelligence: Genius level

You see, this fight will be incredible, and very exciting to watch since both of them are so equaly matched. However, in the Ironman will win, but only because he is more smart then Superman and will find a way to win.

Of course, the easiest way would be to create a suit made with Krypton in or or simply create a special weapon that can shoot out kryptonide gas or rays. However, I think Ironman would rather decide to fight Superman the normal way then use kryptonide. Now people will say that Superman will just rip off Ironman's siut, but those people don't know that depending on the siut, Ironman's powers defer. As a matter of fact, Ironman has a siut for batteling against The Hulk and gives him strenght to lift 100+ tons, which puts him in the same category as Superman.

Now, if I remember correctly, Lex Luthor had robots, Ironman type, that went and faught Superman and gave him a very hard time. Still Superman won in the end since he's the start of the show and the robots weren't built by Tony Stark, only the second most intelligent person in the whole Marvel Universe. Tony will just build a siut that will match Superman's strenght and speed and weapons to match Superman's powers. And because of that, I believe that Tony can come up with enough weapons and powerfull enough to defeat Superman, not destroy him, but defeat him.

Winner: Ironman

What is the controversy behind the Captain Marvel movie?

I am going to skip right over the fact that no comic fan actually likes Captain Marvel and the fact that she is low tier on the power scale in the comics but Disney is marketing her as the most powerful Avenger and go right to what I actually consider the main controversy at the moment is and what will probably sink the movie.So after almost three years of hype they finally dropped the trailer for the Captain Marvel movie. And… lets just say it was dull. Really, really dull.There wasn’t much to get excited about in the trailer and and to top if off Brie Larson, someone who somehow won an academy award, manages to have the same bored wooden look on her face in every scene. I mean there is literally a scene where she is having electricity shot through her brain and she still looks bored.So people pointed this out and in response Brie Larson and the shill media went full Ghostbusters 2016 and attacked anyone who didn’t like the trailer as a sexist. As if there has never been a female in the MCU before.You know because that has worked so well in the past. If people give you any kind of constructive criticism there is no reason to learn from it. Instead just attack them as a racist or a sexist. That will make them want to see your movie.In short, I think the main controversy with Captain Marvel is the way that the people in charge and their puppets in the media are responding to the honest opinions of the fans.We already saw a Star Wars movie flop for the same reason recently. Something a few years ago I would have thought was impossible. So I wouldn’t be surprised if this is the first MCU flop. I just thought it wouldn’t happen until after Infinity War part 2.

TRENDING NEWS